Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 8, 2005, 07:18 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Widescreen iBook? (Unliklely)

Digitimes claims that Quanta Computer has recently obtained orders for a New model of Apple iBook.

Quote:
Quanta, already the biggest contract maker for Apple’s PowerBooks, will start to ship 14.1-inch widescreen iBooks as early as the fourth quarter of 2005, the sources said.
In general, Digitimes' reports have been consistently inaccurate. Last report claimed that Apple would be shipping G5 iBooks as well as G5 PowerBooks by end of the 2nd Quarter of 2005.

Last edited by arn : Apr 8, 2005 at 07:29 AM.
MacRumors is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 07:24 AM   #2
Davito
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
That sounds good. But this source seems really unreliable.

Last edited by Davito : Apr 8, 2005 at 08:59 AM.
Davito is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 07:24 AM   #3
BornAgainMac
macrumors 68030
 
BornAgainMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida Resident
Eventually it will happen. I am seeing more and more High Definition wide screen PC laptops that support HD video. The screens are very bright and clear. At least if we can't have G5's in a notebook, we can have better displays.
BornAgainMac is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 07:25 AM   #4
mcadam
macrumors 6502a
 
mcadam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: københavn
Send a message via ICQ to mcadam
Hmmm... could be nice, but not exactly a quantum-leap for apple... On the other hand I love the iBooks, so I very welcome further development on them.

A
__________________
If you live every day as if it was your last, one day you are most certainly gonna be right - Steve
mcadam is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 07:31 AM   #5
wilburpan
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
I agree that this will eventually happen, especially if this is the year of HDTV and Apple.

But why is this a Page 1 item if Digitimes has been so unreliable in the past? Appleinsider has been more accurate and their last item was put on Page 2.
wilburpan is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 07:32 AM   #6
slipper
macrumors 65816
 
slipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
this absurd thread makes me want to puke all over myself.
slipper is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 07:35 AM   #7
Knox
macrumors god
 
Knox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilburpan
But why is this a Page 1 item if Digitimes has been so unreliable in the past? Appleinsider has been more accurate and their last item was put on Page 2.
I think arn sometimes puts reports on the front page if there's going to be a high level of interest about it, even if the reports are likely to be wrong.
Knox is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 07:35 AM   #8
liketom
macrumors 68040
 
liketom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lincoln,UK
Send a message via AIM to liketom
Quote:
Originally Posted by slipper
this absurd thread makes me want to puke all over myself.
nice .. if you puke on your lap people will think you just bought a dell LOL

also where's mini mod to close the other ibook widescreen thread ?
__________________
18,000 miles is a long way
liketom is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 07:35 AM   #9
edesignuk
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
 
edesignuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Great(?) Britain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
consistently inaccurate
The most important part of this article Don't anybody go getting excited.
__________________
V's wise words
Search before you post: MRoogle
edesignuk is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 07:35 AM   #10
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilburpan
But why is this a Page 1 item if Digitimes has been so unreliable in the past? Appleinsider has been more accurate and their last item was put on Page 2.
The last Appleinsider article didn't really offer much details - page 2, not for not being reliable - just for not being very substantial.

Digitimes unfortunately gets reported on by lots of web sites. As a result, people are going to be submitting this news item all day. it made more sense just to post it and say it's not likely to happen.

arn
arn is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 07:59 AM   #11
cal6n
macrumors 65816
 
cal6n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brighton, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
In general, Digitimes' reports have been consistently inaccurate. Last report claimed that Apple would be shipping G5 iBooks as well as G5 PowerBooks by end of the 2nd Quarter of 2005.
There's nearly 3 months till the end of Q2, so how is this unreliable?

Quote:
Originally Posted by slipper
this absurd thread makes me want to puke all over myself.
Feel free. Why should we care about your personal hygene?
__________________
Is your internet experience tainted by trolls, shills, bigots & fools?
Click [username] > View Public Profile > Add [username] to Your Ignore List > Save List
Every little helps.
cal6n is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 08:08 AM   #12
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
Quote:
Originally Posted by cal6n
There's nearly 3 months till the end of Q2, so how is this unreliable?
Financial Q2 is about to end.

This isn't the first time they've been wrong: http://www.macrumors.com/site.php?mo...it=Search+Site

arn
arn is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 08:12 AM   #13
gadget-uk
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Etherland
ahem....

*cough*...

don't mind me

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=119133
gadget-uk is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 08:19 AM   #14
JFreak
macrumors 68040
 
JFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
not going to happen before the 12" power(less)book gets widescreen
__________________
what we do in life, echoes in eternity.
JFreak is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 08:33 AM   #15
MacsRgr8
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
I'll just be happy if they upped the rez on the 14" model.
Something like 1280 x 960 would be nice.
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 08:53 AM   #16
AidenShaw
macrumors Demi-God
 
AidenShaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Peninsula (Northern Silicon Valley)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacsRgr8
I'll just be happy if they upped the rez on the 14" model.
Something like 1280 x 960 would be nice.

Apple's display resolution is falling way behind the industry.

My 14" Dell laptop has 13% more pixels than a 17" PowerBook....

- Dell D600 - 1400x1050 - 1.470 MPixels
- PB 17" - 1440x900 - 1.296 MPixels
__________________
-as
Marriage Equality - Have you talked about it with your gay friends, your gay colleagues and your gay relatives?

Last edited by AidenShaw : Apr 8, 2005 at 09:00 AM. Reason: display updates are overdue
AidenShaw is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 08:58 AM   #17
liketom
macrumors 68040
 
liketom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lincoln,UK
Send a message via AIM to liketom
Quote:
Originally Posted by AidenShaw
Apple's display resolution is falling way behind the industry.

My 14" Dell laptop has 13% more pixels than a 17" PowerBook....

- Dell D600 - 1400x1050 - 1.470 MPixels
- PB 17" - 1440x900 - 1.296 MPixels
so i take it you get a bigger blue screen of death then ? lol

but you are right if apple wants to take the lead on displays it needs to start uping some of them! HD anyone ?
__________________
18,000 miles is a long way
liketom is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 09:01 AM   #18
AidenShaw
macrumors Demi-God
 
AidenShaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Peninsula (Northern Silicon Valley)
Quote:
Originally Posted by liketom
so i take it you get a bigger blue screen of death then ? lol?
No, a smaller, brighter, more detailed BSOD !!
__________________
-as
Marriage Equality - Have you talked about it with your gay friends, your gay colleagues and your gay relatives?
AidenShaw is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 09:34 AM   #19
jaw04005
macrumors 68030
 
jaw04005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: AR
If Apple was to provide higher resolution notebook displays, is there an automatic way to size up icons, fonts, etc to make them as large as they currently are with 1024 x 768?

I'm all for more resolution, but I wouldn't want to have to strain my eyes just to read text or click on an icon.

Currently, I know of just one way, and that would be manually adjust every icon and text size.
jaw04005 is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 09:38 AM   #20
alms
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston
What makes it wide screen?

If it's still a 14.1 inch iBook, what makes it "wide screen"? (Clearly I'm out of the loop on HD lingo.)
alms is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 09:49 AM   #21
Mitthrawnuruodo
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
Mitthrawnuruodo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bergen, Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshuawaire
If Apple was to provide higher resolution notebook displays, is there an automatic way to size up icons, fonts, etc to make them as large as they currently are with 1024 x 768?

I'm all for more resolution, but I wouldn't want to have to strain my eyes just to read text or click on an icon.

Currently, I know of just one way, and that would be manually adjust every icon and text size.
Finder: View -> Show View Options (cmd-J)
__________________
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it;
those who fail to learn history correctly...
why, they are simply doomed.
Mitthrawnuruodo is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 09:52 AM   #22
Mitthrawnuruodo
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
Mitthrawnuruodo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bergen, Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by alms
If it's still a 14.1 inch iBook, what makes it "wide screen"? (Clearly I'm out of the loop on HD lingo.)
On a "normal" screen the width:height ratio is 4:3, on a widescreen its 16:9 (or 16:10).
__________________
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it;
those who fail to learn history correctly...
why, they are simply doomed.
Mitthrawnuruodo is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 10:15 AM   #23
solvs
macrumors 601
 
solvs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LaLaLand, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by arn
Digitimes unfortunately gets reported on by lots of web sites. As a result, people are going to be submitting this news item all day. it made more sense just to post it and say it's not likely to happen.
Ah, see now that you've said that it makes more sense. Would be nice to get a widescreen mini-book though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AidenShaw
No, a smaller, brighter, more detailed BSOD !!
I do believe that's the funniest thing I've ever heard you say. And I also would like better displays on some of the notebooks. But am I the only one that likes low resolution displays? Bad eyes. The 20" iMac is fine, but the 17" isn't so great, and it's even worse when you try to lower the res (being LCDs and all).

I can't imagine a 12" book at higher than 1024. 14", maybe. But even then I'm squinting. You guys must have pretty good vision, or you sit a lot closer.
__________________
True love never dies
The only thing more dangerous than a woman scorned, is a man with nothing left to lose...
solvs is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 10:23 AM   #24
ccuilla
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by arn
Financial Q2 is about to end.
Was the rumor tied to financial or calendar quarters? Whenever I hear something that is non-financial, I generally assume calendar quarters.

That said, yes, they have been wrong before, and it also seems highly unlikely we'll see the G5 in a portable computer very soon. And almost certainly not by June 30th.
ccuilla is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2005, 10:29 AM   #25
jnicolso1
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Adelaide
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccuilla
Was the rumor tied to financial or calendar quarters? Whenever I hear something that is non-financial, I generally assume calendar quarters.

That said, yes, they have been wrong before, and it also seems highly unlikely we'll see the G5 in a portable computer very soon. And almost certainly not by June 30th.
I have given up hope and am going to keep running my machine until they release the next G5 desktop. I will just use my G4 PB to run the G5 using timbuktu when I am away.
__________________
128KB mac 400KB disc drive ; Mac SE 8 MHz 4 MB 2O MB
Mac II Vi 16 Mhz 16 MB 120 MB HD ; Powerbook 520 can't remember
PPC 7200 75 MHz 64 MB 200 MB ; 400MHz G3 Powerbook 192 MB 6 GB
1.25 GHz Powerbook 1.5GB 80 GB ; 17" 1.67 GHz Powerbook 2GB 100 GB still waiting for G5
jnicolso1 is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC