Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jul 22, 2011, 08:48 PM   #1
Yumunum
macrumors 65816
 
Yumunum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: U.S.
2011 13" i5 MBA vs. 2010 13" C2D MBP?

How would the CPU and GPUs power compare, between a 13" 2011 Air and a 2010 13" Core 2 Duo MBP? The Pro was my last computer and I'm thinking of getting an Air. If the processor is as decent as the Pro I'd be pretty happy. Anyone know for sure?
Yumunum is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2011, 08:53 PM   #2
nebulos
macrumors 6502a
 
nebulos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
i don't think anyone's discussed this yet. still, if you look really hard, you might find something.
nebulos is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2011, 09:00 PM   #3
clyde2801
macrumors 601
 
clyde2801's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In the land of no hills and red dirt.
Was that sarcasm? Wasn't it all over the internets that the 2011 i5 air beat the 2010 pro in performance yesterday?

Truthfully, what are you using the computer for? If its fairly non intensive stuff, you probably won't tell the difference if you stick in a decent data ii ssd in the pro.
__________________
I've found that the sanest question I can ask myself is 'Am I going crazy?' --Jack Robbins
2012 base 15" rMBP, 2012 base 11" MBA, late 2011 2.4 i7 17" MBP, 16 gb ram, Crucial M4 512gb SSD
clyde2801 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2011, 09:56 PM   #4
nebulos
macrumors 6502a
 
nebulos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
it has been foretold that partial answers to these deep questions lie hidden in this vortex:

((((((((((((@))))))))))))))
nebulos is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2011, 10:16 PM   #5
MarlboroLite
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: the 13 colonies
CPU: If you go by Geekbench scores, the 1.7GHz i5 in the Air at 5860 beats pretty much any MacBook Pro ever made before 2010, and hangs in the same territory as the top of the line i7s found in the 15 (5910) and 17 (5837) inch MBPs before the Thunderbolt refresh ...which just about hang in the same territory as the entry level 2.3GHz i5 13 inch MBP introduced this year in that Thunderbolt refresh (5917)....

So in other words, with the 1.7GHz core i5 found in the Air, you basically have an equally powerful machine as the top of the line MBPs from 2010, as well as the entry level 13 inch MBP introduced this year.

GPU: It's Intel HD3000....and there's not much to say about that. It is indeed a step backward if you need graphical power. For HD movies, etc...it's fine.
__________________
2.53 13in unibody MacBook Pro | 32GB Verizon iPhone 5
MarlboroLite is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2011, 11:06 PM   #6
clyde2801
macrumors 601
 
clyde2801's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In the land of no hills and red dirt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarlboroLite View Post
CPU: If you go by Geekbench scores, the 1.7GHz i5 in the Air at 5860 beats pretty much any MacBook Pro ever made before 2010, and hangs in the same territory as the top of the line i7s found in the 15 (5910) and 17 (5837) inch MBPs before the Thunderbolt refresh ...which just about hang in the same territory as the entry level 2.3GHz i5 13 inch MBP introduced this year in that Thunderbolt refresh (5917)....

So in other words, with the 1.7GHz core i5 found in the Air, you basically have an equally powerful machine as the top of the line MBPs from 2010, as well as the entry level 13 inch MBP introduced this year.

GPU: It's Intel HD3000....and there's not much to say about that. It is indeed a step backward if you need graphical power. For HD movies, etc...it's fine.
Again, it depends on the OP's uses. If it's general lightweight consumer stuff, it would make as much sense as buying a ferrari to make your weekly two block drive over to the grocery store down 25mph residential streets.
__________________
I've found that the sanest question I can ask myself is 'Am I going crazy?' --Jack Robbins
2012 base 15" rMBP, 2012 base 11" MBA, late 2011 2.4 i7 17" MBP, 16 gb ram, Crucial M4 512gb SSD
clyde2801 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 01:44 AM   #7
runtohell121
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
MacBook Pro 13 2010 P8800 Processor: http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/444773
Macbook Air 11 i5: http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/444772
__________________
6/24/2010 - iPhone 4 16gb AT&T
12/20/2012 - iPhone 5 16gb AT&T
runtohell121 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 01:58 AM   #8
Davidkoh
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
My 13" i5 MBA > my old 13" c2d MBP
Davidkoh is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 02:02 AM   #9
fotuwe
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009

Before selling my MBP2010 I run Xbench.
I've had a Intel Postville SSD + 8 GB. So kinda maxed out... my results are above. I'd like to see some Xbench results made by MBAi5/i7 owners... I will get mine on monday.

Last edited by fotuwe; Jul 23, 2011 at 12:30 PM.
fotuwe is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Price Advice: 13" 2010 mbp c2d cbben Buying Tips and Advice 1 Nov 30, 2013 09:55 PM
Sell 2010 MBP 15" for 2011 MBA 13" or 2012 MBA 11" Opinions?? eddiexhart MacBook Air 8 Sep 23, 2012 11:51 AM
What to expect switching from MBP 17" 2010 to MBA 13"? hajime MacBook Air 0 Sep 16, 2012 02:17 AM
MBA 13" 2012 or Refurb MBP 15" Late 2011 or Imac 27" Arsolu Buying Tips and Advice 2 Jun 12, 2012 06:58 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC