Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 7, 2011, 12:38 PM   #1
Gregintosh
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
Are SSD Failures common?

Now that SSDs are standard, I wonder if the failure rates of hard drives are any lower an before? In other words, is the sense of security that SSDs have no mechanical parts, thus an HD crash is unlikely, a false sense of security or is it for real?
Gregintosh is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2011, 01:47 PM   #2
happyslayer
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Glendale, AZ
I build and service PC's and Mac's for a living.

I have installed probably thirty or so SSD's in the last couple years.

I have had two of them have problems. One was my own Runcore 128GB SSD I put in a previous RevB MBA, and the other was a desktop model OCZ 128GB model I put in a customer's PC. In both cases, it appeared to be a controller error on the SSD. They just ceased to function and no longer showed up on the systems as an available or bootable drive.

I have not noticed any data or file system issues on any SSD I have installed.

My father-in-law has had a failure on a Western Digital 128GB SSD he got cheap on Newegg and he is on his second OCZ Revodrive X2 PCIe model 100GB SSD. Again, they appear to be controller/SSD-system-board issues.

So there are failures. However, I have installed several hundred rotational drives over the years and there have been many, many different kinds of failures with them as well.

So, basically, no tech is perfect. However, SSD's are certainly the fastest things out there, can't be hurt by every-day types of shock (banging around in cases and packs) and generally can't succumb to the typical kinds of rotational drive issues.

For my own desktops and laptops - Mac and PC - I have upgraded or ordered them with SSD's and will never go back. I only use a couple big rotational drives for back-up and storage of video and audio.

My two cents.
__________________
2013 11.6 Macbook Air-1.3GHz i5, 8GB, 128SSD ; iPhone5-16GB, black ; iPad Mini, 16GB, black, VZ LTE
happyslayer is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2011, 02:04 PM   #3
Fernandez21
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by happyslayer View Post
I build and service PC's and Mac's for a living.

I have installed probably thirty or so SSD's in the last couple years.

I have had two of them have problems. One was my own Runcore 128GB SSD I put in a previous RevB MBA, and the other was a desktop model OCZ 128GB model I put in a customer's PC. In both cases, it appeared to be a controller error on the SSD. They just ceased to function and no longer showed up on the systems as an available or bootable drive.

I have not noticed any data or file system issues on any SSD I have installed.

My father-in-law has had a failure on a Western Digital 128GB SSD he got cheap on Newegg and he is on his second OCZ Revodrive X2 PCIe model 100GB SSD. Again, they appear to be controller/SSD-system-board issues.

So there are failures. However, I have installed several hundred rotational drives over the years and there have been many, many different kinds of failures with them as well.

So, basically, no tech is perfect. However, SSD's are certainly the fastest things out there, can't be hurt by every-day types of shock (banging around in cases and packs) and generally can't succumb to the typical kinds of rotational drive issues.

For my own desktops and laptops - Mac and PC - I have upgraded or ordered them with SSD's and will never go back. I only use a couple big rotational drives for back-up and storage of video and audio.

My two cents.
out of curiosity, were you able to retrieve any of the data on those drives? just wondering if that possible incase of failure.
__________________
USF student. 3 years ago I was an apple hater, today:
11" Macbook Air, 1.8 GHz Intel core i7, 4 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD ; 64 GB iPad 3 LTE ; 64gb iPhone 5 ; Apple t.v.
The koolaid tastes gooood.
Fernandez21 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2011, 02:17 PM   #4
mstrze
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Send a message via AIM to mstrze
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fernandez21 View Post
out of curiosity, were you able to retrieve any of the data on those drives? just wondering if that possible incase of failure.
When a huge external costs much less than $100 and Time Machine software makes it so simple to back up, why would this even be an issue?

In case of failure, you recover your data from the Time Machine backup.

The days of not having a backup because of cost or difficulty are far behind us now. There is no good excuse for not having one. Drive fails...buy a new one and reinstall all of your data from the backup.

Or spend $100 or so on software that might be able to recover the data or send it to a company who can take apart the drive and recover your data for probably a few hundred bucks...with no access your data for a week or more. Up to you.
mstrze is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2011, 03:48 PM   #5
reputationZed
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 34°55′42″N 80°44′41″W (34.928201, -80.744835)
Worth a read

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...rate,2923.html
__________________
But you and I, we’ve been through that,
And this is not our fate. - Dylan 1968
reputationZed is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2011, 09:53 PM   #6
Gregintosh
Thread Starter
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
I'm not worried about the data since I use dropbox for anything critical, I'm more concerned about traveling.

Basically, I want to minimize the chance that I'll be in another state or heck, another country relying on my computer to run my business and then having it crash and be unusable.

That's why I am curious about this, since I always thought that removing the moving parts would solve 99.9% of issues.
Gregintosh is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2011, 10:09 PM   #7
Gregintosh
Thread Starter
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by reputationZed View Post
Excellent article. I gues SSDs are just hard drives in the end. So love em for their speed and energy use but their reliability is more or less the same.
Gregintosh is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 8, 2011, 04:19 AM   #8
reputationZed
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 34°55′42″N 80°44′41″W (34.928201, -80.744835)
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

Yes and no. HDD failures are typically die to a physical issue while SSD failures are typically related to firmware. The physical limitations of a spinning disk complicate making any major improvements in reliability. Firmware should improve over time so there is a good chance SSD's will increase in reliability.
__________________
But you and I, we’ve been through that,
And this is not our fate. - Dylan 1968
reputationZed is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 8, 2011, 07:54 AM   #9
Azathoth
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregintosh View Post
Now that SSDs are standard, I wonder if the failure rates of hard drives are any lower an before? In other words, is the sense of security that SSDs have no mechanical parts, thus an HD crash is unlikely, a false sense of security or is it for real?
We have 900 Intel X25 on order here - I'll get back to you in a year's time

TBH I have a customer that complained about some 160GB Intel SSDs dying, but I dont know the cause.

IMO SSDs are less prone to failure, but failure is often catastrophic and unrecoverable. HDDs tend to give early warning signs, and following a failure there is a lot of SW like SpinRite, that can be used for recovery.
Azathoth is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 8, 2011, 11:41 AM   #10
Brandon0448
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
I bought a cheap ADATA SSD for my PC and I'm pretty sure the controller failed on it after only like 3 days of use. After I got a refund I purchased a more expensive Intel SSD and haven't had a problem since.
__________________
2011 13" Macbook Air i7 256g / iPhone 5 64GB / iPad 3 64GB / ATV2
Brandon0448 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My 2010 17" MBP destroys SSDs chopper dave MacBook Pro 8 Apr 29, 2011 01:34 PM
OCZ Vertex SSD appleuser1991 Mac Peripherals 0 Dec 14, 2010 02:46 PM
Safari Beta- What are they gonna fix? Are my problems common? Baya87 Mac Applications and Mac App Store 15 Jun 1, 2009 07:42 AM
Mobile Substrate failure... Common problem? Knowlege Bomb Jailbreaks and iOS Hacks 2 Dec 14, 2008 02:17 PM
Are HDD failures still common in latest macbook hStack MacBook 19 May 28, 2008 04:42 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC