|
|
#1 |
|
Quad i5 or Quad i7 Imac
I have the opportunity to buy an iMac at a reasonable price! I'm not sure whether or not to go for the i5 or i7?
My main program is Lightroom 3 and a tiny bit of CS5. Presently my Raw images are only 10mb, but in the next year or so I hope to upgrade to a Canon 5dmkII which has 21mp images. Will Lightroom utilise hyper threading? Is it worth spending the extra for "future proofing". Whilst the difference in price is roughly £100 after I have sold some bits, it is still £100! I currently have a 2.66 i7 MBP and don't need the portability anymore.
__________________
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Why not just get a good external monitor and keyboard setup? That MBPro outclasses the '08 machine I use for photo editing. It amounts to a big paperweight next to my 23 in. Samsung monitor, but it's cheaper than a new iMac. Every time I think I need to upgrade, I open iStat Pro and look at my processor usage during an operation. I never seem to use more that 65% of my Core2Duo. I do need more ram, though.
My 2k worth. Dale
__________________
How to Post, Quote and Multi-Quote Photos - My Google Docs Folder 12/2011 I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I went with a base i5 QC iMac and it is quick. I upped the RAM to 8GB. I have a 1Ds (file sizes vary up to 14MB), and will probably get a 1Ds2 before next spring. After working on my files, they quickly climb to 100MB each (after running actions, some NiK work, etc) and I have many files open at the same time, as well as my iTunes library (that is all music and 110GB), Aperture 3 running with Office 2011 and Ai CS4. No hiccups!
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Thats good to know! I have a great setup with my MBP with a nice Dell external and keyboard and trackpad. As I don't need portability and always like more poke I figured it was worth it. Plus with my discount and selling my MBP I won't be spending any money.
__________________
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 |
|
You will get some benefit from the hyperthreading- just up to you as to whether it will be 100GBP worth. I noticed when I use LR with my i7 mini server, when rendering previews it does max out all 8 threads- so at least LR is multithreaded enough to utilize the available cores.
Obviously as it's hyperthreaded virtual cores and not 4 additional physical cores, it's not going to be 2x the speed. I don't know what the efficiency gain is for hyperthreading, anyone know? Ruahrc |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I'm with Designer Dale on this one... use your money to buy more glass. No need to get an iMac.
__________________
MBP 2.53 GHz Unibody 2008 | PB G4 1.25GHz Alum | G4 Quicksilver 733Mhz | iPod Touch 4G | iPod Video 30GB |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quad I5 verus Quad I7 imac for Final Cut 7 | howardnow | iMac | 5 | Sep 3, 2011 05:14 PM |
| imac quad I5 vs. quad I7 for FCP 7 | howardnow | Digital Video | 0 | Aug 31, 2011 12:08 AM |
| New 27" iMac with quad i5 or better i7 ? | viento | iMac | 5 | Jul 24, 2011 03:17 PM |
| Difference between the Quad i5 and Quad i7 | FrankySavvy | iMac | 3 | May 3, 2011 01:20 PM |
| Help me choose between imac. Standard 3.6ghz i5 or Quad core i5 or i7? | opencube | iMac | 2 | Feb 15, 2011 07:31 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 PM.







Linear Mode

