Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac Pro

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 2, 2011, 02:03 PM   #1
BigJohno
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Send a message via AIM to BigJohno
Video cards in 2011-12 mac pro

What video cards do you think they will be putting in the upcoming Mac pro refresh? 6xxxx series or 7?
__________________
Mac Pro 5,1 3.33 SSD's GTX 670, Macbook Pro 2.66, iPhone, iPad
Flickr
BigJohno is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 2, 2011, 04:06 PM   #2
Tanax
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Seeing as AMD haven't released 7xxx yet(and won't until 2012 since it's been delayed), I doubt we'll see the 7xxx-series in the Mac Pro-refresh -- unless the Mac Pro isn't released until like summer 2012, which I seriously hope not.
Tanax is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 2, 2011, 08:05 PM   #3
BigJohno
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Send a message via AIM to BigJohno
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanax View Post
Seeing as AMD haven't released 7xxx yet(and won't until 2012 since it's been delayed), I doubt we'll see the 7xxx-series in the Mac Pro-refresh -- unless the Mac Pro isn't released until like summer 2012, which I seriously hope not.
I really hope its not delayed until then. Im in the market for a Mac pro but I don't really want to get the current gen for the price Apple wants. Im also going to be playing Battlefield 3 and I'm afraid of the 5870 not being powerful enough.
__________________
Mac Pro 5,1 3.33 SSD's GTX 670, Macbook Pro 2.66, iPhone, iPad
Flickr
BigJohno is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2011, 12:06 PM   #4
ActionableMango
macrumors 68030
 
ActionableMango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJohno View Post
I really hope its not delayed until then. Im in the market for a Mac pro but I don't really want to get the current gen for the price Apple wants. Im also going to be playing Battlefield 3 and I'm afraid of the 5870 not being powerful enough.
The 5870 is powerful enough for Battlefield 3.

I'm currently playing the beta with a 5770.
ActionableMango is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2011, 01:25 PM   #5
BigJohno
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Send a message via AIM to BigJohno
Quote:
Originally Posted by ActionableMango View Post
The 5870 is powerful enough for Battlefield 3.

I'm currently playing the beta with a 5770.
Nativ res on 27" with highest settings?
__________________
Mac Pro 5,1 3.33 SSD's GTX 670, Macbook Pro 2.66, iPhone, iPad
Flickr
BigJohno is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2011, 02:18 PM   #6
derbothaus
macrumors 68040
 
derbothaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJohno View Post
Nativ res on 27" with highest settings?
The beta does not have "highest settings". Confirmed medium on everything. People are getting 40-45fps on beta with 6970m iMac at 2560x1440. A 5870 is 50% faster than a 6970m. You will not be able to do the real "Ultra" at 2560x1440 on a HD5870. SLI'd GTX580's may not be able to do that. It'll be fine for 1920x1080 on Ultra most likely but no-one knows until it ships for real.
__________________
Mac Pro W3680, GTX 680 2GB, 12GB DDR3, SSD; MBP Mid 2012, 2.6GHz Core i7, 16GB DDR3, SSD
derbothaus is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2011, 03:04 PM   #7
ActionableMango
macrumors 68030
 
ActionableMango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJohno View Post
Nativ res on 27" with highest settings?
I don't know. At my native res I am running at 1920x1200. I do have the max settings, but as others have pointed out the settings in the beta aren't real. Also, many of the textures are obviously low-res in the beta. Painfully obvious.

5870 is as fast as your are going to get with a card that works 100% with OS X right now. We do know that partially working 6xxx drivers are showing up in Lion. There is also some progress with 6950 and 6970 hacks, but it's not there yet.

My guess is 6xxx series up to 6970. No 6990 and no 7xxx.
ActionableMango is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2011, 03:47 PM   #8
derbothaus
macrumors 68040
 
derbothaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
I would think new Mac Pro's will have 6870 (cheap) as default with a 6970 option.
Or, 6950 with 6970 option but that difference is really too close in performance.
__________________
Mac Pro W3680, GTX 680 2GB, 12GB DDR3, SSD; MBP Mid 2012, 2.6GHz Core i7, 16GB DDR3, SSD
derbothaus is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2011, 04:34 PM   #9
MacVidCards
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollywood, CA
 
see vendor information in user profile
Anyone who has tried a 6870 would tell you that they work quite well.

In fact, an UNFLASHED 6870 is in many ways more useful than a flashed 5770/5870 in certain situations.

So my money is on 6850/70 as base, with 6950/70 as top end option.

6970 would require that they add an "8 pin" power outlet with ability to carry more juice. To do so would be tantamount to admitting that they made a mistake before, something they hate to do.
MacVidCards is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2011, 06:47 PM   #10
BigJohno
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Send a message via AIM to BigJohno
The 6970 would be a nice card in there. Are there any flashes to get it to to work on current hardware?
__________________
Mac Pro 5,1 3.33 SSD's GTX 670, Macbook Pro 2.66, iPhone, iPad
Flickr
BigJohno is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 08:46 AM   #11
Cindori
macrumors 68040
 
Cindori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Send a message via ICQ to Cindori Send a message via AIM to Cindori Send a message via MSN to Cindori Send a message via Yahoo to Cindori Send a message via Skype™ to Cindori
yes.


http://netkas.org
__________________
Groths.org - new website!
Mac Pro Graphics
Mac hacks and news!
Home of Trim Enabler, Zeus Flashing Tool and Kext Drop!
Cindori is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 09:47 AM   #12
riverwater
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
You guys have forgotten the thunderbolt port, as the new 27 Apple LED Thunderbolt display has released for several months. Anyone know how will ATI and Apple incorporate the thunderbolt port into the graphic card?
__________________
2011 Macbook Air 13, i7 1.8GHz, 4GB RAM, 256GB SSD
2010 Mac Pro, 2x2.93GHz 6-Core, ATI5870, 32GB RAM, 27" ACD
2010 MacBook Pro 15, 2.66GHz i7, Hi-Res AG, 128GB SSD, 4GB RAM
riverwater is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 12:11 PM   #13
goMac
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
ATI 3D Rage IIc.
goMac is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 01:00 PM   #14
BigJohno
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Send a message via AIM to BigJohno
Quote:
Originally Posted by riverwater View Post
You guys have forgotten the thunderbolt port, as the new 27 Apple LED Thunderbolt display has released for several months. Anyone know how will ATI and Apple incorporate the thunderbolt port into the graphic card?
Thats the big question right now. How are they going to implement TB in the new Mac Pro. I have heard that the new display only works with thunderbolt enabled computers... What if you want to daisy chain an old 24" off the new 27" TB monitor? I would assume that AMD or Nvidia would be working with apple to develop a card that has a TB controller on it.
__________________
Mac Pro 5,1 3.33 SSD's GTX 670, Macbook Pro 2.66, iPhone, iPad
Flickr
BigJohno is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 01:28 PM   #15
Steelgrave
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by riverwater View Post
You guys have forgotten the thunderbolt port, as the new 27 Apple LED Thunderbolt display has released for several months. Anyone know how will ATI and Apple incorporate the thunderbolt port into the graphic card?
Bigger question might be "If" they are. Other than the assumed naming schemes for the next gen cards from ATI/Nvidia I haven't seen anything about them.
__________________
2010 Mac Pro 2.4Ghz Octo 32GB ram, VM's galore
2012 MBA 11" i7 256GB
iPad Mini 64GB, and a couple Mini's
Steelgrave is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 01:36 PM   #16
BigJohno
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Send a message via AIM to BigJohno
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steelgrave View Post
Bigger question might be "If" they are. Other than the assumed naming schemes for the next gen cards from ATI/Nvidia I haven't seen anything about them.
I would think that the pro is where thunderbolt is needed. I don't understand why its in the other products before it. Do you think the average user needs to back up to their time machine in 1 min instead of 15. I don't think they care. Even the iPhone and iPad don't have TB. I know the chip prob won't fit in the iPhone but it would in the iPad. hmmm
__________________
Mac Pro 5,1 3.33 SSD's GTX 670, Macbook Pro 2.66, iPhone, iPad
Flickr
BigJohno is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 02:39 PM   #17
Steelgrave
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Alot of folks would argue that USB 3.0 is needed, but it isn't gonna happen anytime soon heh.

If I had to guess I'd say ATI is working on their cards to have a T-bolt plug on it for the monitors, and there will be a 2nd t-bolt plug for other accessories.
__________________
2010 Mac Pro 2.4Ghz Octo 32GB ram, VM's galore
2012 MBA 11" i7 256GB
iPad Mini 64GB, and a couple Mini's
Steelgrave is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 02:44 PM   #18
goMac
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJohno View Post
I would think that the pro is where thunderbolt is needed. I don't understand why its in the other products before it. Do you think the average user needs to back up to their time machine in 1 min instead of 15. I don't think they care. Even the iPhone and iPad don't have TB. I know the chip prob won't fit in the iPhone but it would in the iPad. hmmm
External RAID arrays would be nice on Thunderbolt.
goMac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 04:16 PM   #19
fotomiami
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
What is the benefit of dual video cards?

Currently I have a Mac Pro 1,1 that I upgraded with a ATI 5770.
Wanted to get the 2011/12 mac pros but don't know how long I can hold out for.
If I buy a Mac Pro 5,1 that comes with a 5770 what benefit would I be getting by putting my current 5770 alongside it?
fotomiami is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 04:43 PM   #20
goMac
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotomiami View Post
What is the benefit of dual video cards?

Currently I have a Mac Pro 1,1 that I upgraded with a ATI 5770.
Wanted to get the 2011/12 mac pros but don't know how long I can hold out for.
If I buy a Mac Pro 5,1 that comes with a 5770 what benefit would I be getting by putting my current 5770 alongside it?
Run two different displays on two different cards each with their own dedicated VRAM.

I don't know if anyone has verified that FCPX can use dual cards. OpenCL apps can use dual cards, but that doesn't mean they do.
goMac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 04:55 PM   #21
fotomiami
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by goMac View Post
Run two different displays on two different cards each with their own dedicated VRAM.

I don't know if anyone has verified that FCPX can use dual cards. OpenCL apps can use dual cards, but that doesn't mean they do.
Thanks for the quick answer.

How about for Aperture of Photoshop?

I see a lot of comparisons between the 5870 and 5770 for gaming and what not on sites like barefeats (example: http://barefeats.com/wst10g7.html) but never between a 5870 and dual 5770s.
fotomiami is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 05:03 PM   #22
goMac
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotomiami View Post
Thanks for the quick answer.

How about for Aperture of Photoshop?

I see a lot of comparisons between the 5870 and 5770 for gaming and what not on sites like barefeats (example: http://barefeats.com/wst10g7.html) but never between a 5870 and dual 5770s.
I don't think dual cards will give you an advantage in either Aperture or Photoshop.

Photoshop does not generally make heavy use of the GPU anyway.
goMac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2011, 06:52 PM   #23
derbothaus
macrumors 68040
 
derbothaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJohno View Post
I would think that the pro is where thunderbolt is needed. I don't understand why its in the other products before it. Do you think the average user needs to back up to their time machine in 1 min instead of 15. I don't think they care. Even the iPhone and iPad don't have TB. I know the chip prob won't fit in the iPhone but it would in the iPad. hmmm
TB is no faster unless the user buys more HD's or use SSD's. Having all that bandwidth is useless for 1 HDD. It is for a 3-10 RAID set of HDD's or external SSD's that bring the speed. Looking over Lacie's BigDisk stuff they blur that and show you speeds with RAID0 SSD's through TB connection. The price listed at 400.00 is for 1 HD that can barely break 90MB/s. Misleading but then again users were all exited for SATAII for their laptop 5400RPM drives. Also a chuckle.
Apples Display is ridiculous at this point. No one should buy that thing. Especially not a pro. LED backlight with glossy glass and no connections? deltaE above 2.0 for an ISP display. Terrible. Then add the fact only 1 size. They almost don't want you buying their display's. Is the cable any longer this time around? That was a severe joke with the new screens.
__________________
Mac Pro W3680, GTX 680 2GB, 12GB DDR3, SSD; MBP Mid 2012, 2.6GHz Core i7, 16GB DDR3, SSD
derbothaus is offline   -1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 7, 2011, 03:36 PM   #24
BigJohno
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Send a message via AIM to BigJohno
Why I brought this up was because I am having significant issues with my current iMac. Its 09 i7 27". The video card kind of stinks. I use sketchbook pro a lot and I have significant brush lag when the canvas is rotated. I used it both on lion, snow leopard, and win 7 on the same machine and get the same crap performance. Do any of you guys use Sketchbook pro on a 27" screen? Do you get the same performance? What video card are you using.
__________________
Mac Pro 5,1 3.33 SSD's GTX 670, Macbook Pro 2.66, iPhone, iPad
Flickr
BigJohno is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 7, 2011, 04:28 PM   #25
VanneDC
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dubai, UAE
Sketchbook pro here on a Cintiq 21UX.. on a gtx285.. no dramas what so ever..
__________________
2008 Mac Pro 3,1
2.8Ghz V8/12GB/GTX470/8800GT/SSD
Wacom Cintiq 21UX 1x24" Sony PS3 3D display.
VanneDC is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac Pro

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4 Graphics Cards in 2010 Mac Pro Stephen23 Mac Pro 29 Jun 29, 2012 04:20 AM
Graphic card problem of my Mac Pro Leslie.Hon Mac Pro 8 Dec 21, 2011 01:28 PM
Upgrading video card in early '08 Mac Pro? GoKyu Mac Pro 11 Aug 9, 2009 05:59 PM
Which video card in a new Mac Pro? CoffeeMonkey Buying Tips and Advice 3 Oct 18, 2007 12:46 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC