Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 11, 2005, 12:20 AM   #1
MacBytes
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Shuffle Versus the Rest




Category: 3rd Party Hardware
Link: Shuffle Versus the Rest

Posted on MacBytes.com
Approved by Mudbug
MacBytes is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 12:26 AM   #2
PlaceofDis
macrumors Core
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
my shuffle is great thank you very much, plus i dont look at the screen of my mini except when i fire it up, but the shuffle is small enough that no screen is neccissary, and who wants an FM tuner or AA batteries to worry about?

i think the shuffle is great, but its obviously not for everyone
__________________
dim my eyes on the waves of confessions...
PlaceofDis is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 12:42 AM   #3
mduser63
macrumors 68040
 
mduser63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Send a message via AIM to mduser63
I got an iPod shuffle this last weekend, and I've been really enjoying it. I really don't miss the screen. I load it up with some of my favorite tracks using a smart playlist and autofill, and just put it on shuffle, and it's like a radio that plays only songs that I really like. The showstopper with some of the other flash players (that have screens) is the fact that they can't play protected AAC files. I realize that this is not the fault of the other manufacturers as Apple won't license FairPlay, but still it means that the iPod shuffle is much more appealing to me. The perfect integration with iTunes is the other thing that really gives the shuffle an edge over the competition.
mduser63 is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 12:46 AM   #4
PlaceofDis
macrumors Core
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
yeah, i cant believe that guy didnt like the iTunes integration, and the autofill feature is one of the best aspects of the shuffle, it makes life fun and random, you dont have to fret over what you are putting on your player, just click, let it fill and go, works wonders
__________________
dim my eyes on the waves of confessions...
PlaceofDis is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 12:50 AM   #5
tech4all
macrumors 68040
 
tech4all's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NorCal
Quote:
Sure, the Shuffle's batteries are rechargeable, while the iRiver uses AA batteries that you have to buy and replace. You recharge a Shuffle when the device is connected to your computer's USB port transferring music. But if you want to be cut free from your PC, you'll need an optional $29 USB power adapter to recharge the Shuffle.
Eventually those AA batteries for the iRiver are going to pass up the $29. Might as well get the power adapter and let it pay for itself in no time.
__________________
I use OS X because of Windows. And I use Android because of iOS.
tech4all is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 01:38 AM   #6
solvs
macrumors 601
 
solvs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LaLaLand, CA
I don't need a screen (better without it), and I prefer a rechargable battery to AAs. The only thing I don't really like is the slider. It needs a grip or something. I get why they did it the way they did, but sometimes it's hard to turn on if it's in your pocket. If you must have radio, but an FMXtra.

Plus it's cheaper than the 128MB model I had just a few years ago (sucked).
__________________
True love never dies
The only thing more dangerous than a woman scorned, is a man with nothing left to lose...
solvs is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 05:03 AM   #7
Neerazan
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, UK
The shuffle isn't like any other MP3 player...

I have been waiting for a reason to get an iPod for way too long now, and having bought one for my other half (she commutes to work every day, so I could justify her needing one even if I didn't ), I got me a shuffle a few weeks ago whilst over in NYC.

Apple have a reputation for making kit that costs more, and does less. And they do. They costs more, because build quality and design costs more. They do less because bells and whistles that others put on their products are often badly implemented, badly thought out, horrible to use and, well, just plain tacky.

The Shuffle does less than other players, because it's designed to. And it could be argued that it costs more, on account of the fact that other similar priced player do more for the same money.

Want a screen, get a Mini. I'm waiting for the next generation of iPods before I get anything bigger than my little Shuffle, but it is great at what it does, and that's pick random tunes from my library, load them up and play them at random. I'm finding tunes I forgot I ever had.

I thought I was gonna make playlists, load them up and play through them sequentialy, but I really do like the random element of shuffle. Honest!

Also, it has the advantage of being the only flash based player that works with iTunes.
Neerazan is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 05:25 AM   #8
wrldwzrd89
macrumors G4
 
wrldwzrd89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solon, OH
Surely Apple can do better than (estimated) 12 hours of battery life on the Shuffle. Some of their competitors are offering (estimated) 40 hours of battery life - more than triple what the iPod Shuffle offers. What's holding you back from doubling, tripling, or even quadrupling the battery life for the iPod Shuffle, Apple?
__________________
iMac Intel (Rev H, 27"), 1TB HDD, 16GB RAM, 10.8.4
wrldwzrd89 is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 05:37 AM   #9
840quadra
Moderator
 
840quadra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Free outdoor Freezers
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrldwzrd89
Surely Apple can do better than (estimated) 12 hours of battery life on the Shuffle. Some of their competitors are offering (estimated) 40 hours of battery life - more than triple what the iPod Shuffle offers. What's holding you back from doubling, tripling, or even quadrupling the battery life for the iPod Shuffle, Apple?
Ease of use and time I would imagine.

To charge a device with that much power reserves on a USB bus would take allot longer then it does with the current battery reserve on the shuffle. If you need more battery life, buy a power pack for your shuffle.
840quadra is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 09:40 AM   #10
jkhanson
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrldwzrd89
Surely Apple can do better than (estimated) 12 hours of battery life on the Shuffle. Some of their competitors are offering (estimated) 40 hours of battery life - more than triple what the iPod Shuffle offers. What's holding you back from doubling, tripling, or even quadrupling the battery life for the iPod Shuffle, Apple?
I find that twelve hours of battery life is way more than enough. I've never even seen the indicator light hit amber yet. People who use the Shuffle for working out, like me, can use it for many days without charging. Suppose you work out an hour a day, that's about two weeks before the battery runs out.

It's not like there are 20 gigs of music on this thing anyway. After 12 hours with the same set of songs, I am ready to reload.
jkhanson is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 10:01 AM   #11
iGary
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Randy's House
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrldwzrd89
Surely Apple can do better than (estimated) 12 hours of battery life on the Shuffle. Some of their competitors are offering (estimated) 40 hours of battery life - more than triple what the iPod Shuffle offers. What's holding you back from doubling, tripling, or even quadrupling the battery life for the iPod Shuffle, Apple?
Why? Who needs 40 freaking hours?
iGary is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 10:48 AM   #12
Stella
macrumors 603
 
Stella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by iGary
Why? Who needs 40 freaking hours?
Convinence, particularly for people who travel a lot.

The same reason you'd want your cell phone to have a large battery life.. so you don't have to recharge it every 2 days...


( People don't seem to think much these days and consider themselves for some kind of benchmark that the rest of the world applies to..)
__________________
Hardware / Software: The right tools for the job - be it Apple or otherwise.
Stella is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 11:06 AM   #13
shamino
macrumors 68040
 
shamino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by iGary
Why? Who needs 40 freaking hours?
When you go on a trip, do you want to be forced to bring a charger along with you?

The last business trip I was on, I needed electrical outlets to plug in my laptop computer, my phone's charger and my PDA's charger. Finding three unused outlets in a hotel room isn't easy - I had to unplug a lamp and move a piece of furniture in order to let everything recharge at night.

Now throw in an iPod. Good luck finding a fourth outlet.

Since I don't relish the idea of packing a power strip when I travel, designing portable devices (including music players) with several days worth of usable charge is a very good thing.
shamino is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 11:28 AM   #14
TwitchOSX
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Southern Oregon
Shamino

I know you used the outlets in the bathroom right?
__________________
Fat chicks need lovin too... they just have to pay
Dual 2.4 4 core Mac Pro (8 cores total) | 1tb hd | 8gb Ram | 27" LED Apple Cinema Diplay (Main) | 2nd 27" ViewSonic LCD
TwitchOSX is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 11:34 AM   #15
jkhanson
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamino
When you go on a trip, do you want to be forced to bring a charger along with you?

The last business trip I was on, I needed electrical outlets to plug in my laptop computer, my phone's charger and my PDA's charger. Finding three unused outlets in a hotel room isn't easy - I had to unplug a lamp and move a piece of furniture in order to let everything recharge at night.

Now throw in an iPod. Good luck finding a fourth outlet.
Ah, but there's the nice thing about the Shuffle. It's small doesn't require an outlet to charge.
jkhanson is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 12:16 PM   #16
applebum
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamino
When you go on a trip, do you want to be forced to bring a charger along with you?

The last business trip I was on, I needed electrical outlets to plug in my laptop ...

Now throw in an iPod. Good luck finding a fourth outlet.
If you have your laptop with you, why do you need an outlet for the iPod - don't all models come with cables that allow you to charge them through the computer?
__________________
I use a Mac. I have upped my computer experience....now up yours!
applebum is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 02:14 PM   #17
shamino
macrumors 68040
 
shamino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by applebum
If you have your laptop with you, why do you need an outlet for the iPod - don't all models come with cables that allow you to charge them through the computer?
Only if the computer is turned on and is not asleep. Otherwise, the USB/FW ports are unpowered. I turn my laptop off and put it away when I'm not using it - so I can quickly take it with me when I leave the hotel in the morning.
shamino is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 02:16 PM   #18
shamino
macrumors 68040
 
shamino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwitchOSX
I know you used the outlets in the bathroom right?
Ah, that's brilliant. So when I wash my hands and the water splashes onto the counter, it can damage my phone/PDA/computer?
shamino is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 02:29 PM   #19
iJaz
macrumors 6502a
 
iJaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamino
Only if the computer is turned on and is not asleep. Otherwise, the USB/FW ports are unpowered. I turn my laptop off and put it away when I'm not using it - so I can quickly take it with me when I leave the hotel in the morning.
My PowerBook charged my 3G 20 Gb iPod (I have sold it) while it was asleep. But some computers seem not to have that function. It was very convenient, I never ever used the charger.
__________________
Home: PM G5 2.3 GHz 4.5 GB RAM, 20" ACD, 1G 512 MB and 2G 1GB Shuffle, 4 GB nano RED, 80 GB iPod, iPhone 3G S⃣ 32 GB Black. Work: MacBook C2D 2.0 GHz 4GB RAM
iJaz is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 05:01 PM   #20
quagmire
macrumors 603
 
quagmire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamino
Only if the computer is turned on and is not asleep. Otherwise, the USB/FW ports are unpowered. I turn my laptop off and put it away when I'm not using it - so I can quickly take it with me when I leave the hotel in the morning.
My Powerbook still charges my iPods when it is asleep. Just not shut down. ( No D'uh )
__________________
Crimes against US History:
CV-6 USS Enterprise
Yankee Stadium
Penn Station-New York
quagmire is online now   0
Old May 11, 2005, 05:11 PM   #21
Mainyehc
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Quote:
Originally Posted by B-52 Macer
My PowerBook charged my 3G 20 Gb iPod (I have sold it) while it was asleep. But some computers seem not to have that function. It was very convenient, I never ever used the charger.
So did my old iMac G4 (I also have a 3G 20GB iPod)... But not my new iMac G5!... Now I have to leave my iMac on during the night and program it to go to sleep 4 hours later... I wonder if it has to do with the firmware or something...
__________________
“Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows.”
—George Orwell [Winston Smith], in “1984”
Mainyehc is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 10:40 PM   #22
gerardrj
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Arizona
Even a flash based player with a screen is fragile. Those displays have thin sheets of glass in them. One hard drop and no more screen.
If you want a truly jogging (or other "extreme" activity") friendly player, it should not have a hard disk or LCD display.
When OLED displays come to mass market, they will be useful for such devices.
gerardrj is offline   0
Old May 11, 2005, 10:44 PM   #23
solvs
macrumors 601
 
solvs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LaLaLand, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by iGary
Why? Who needs 40 freaking hours?
Anybody could use 40 hours. Of course, a lot of those that say they're 40+ hours usually get no where close to that number. Even at 64kbps.

Or are bricks. Even then.
__________________
True love never dies
The only thing more dangerous than a woman scorned, is a man with nothing left to lose...
solvs is offline   0
Old May 12, 2005, 12:59 AM   #24
macidiot
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Send a message via AIM to macidiot
ITS AAC

If the writer and the editors don't even know that its AAC and NOT "ACC" the article and what it has to say is worthless in my view.

Perhaps he thinks that because Duke University uses iPods, there is some sort of built-in ACC compatibility in iPods.

What a moron. feh.
__________________
First Apple: Apple IIe. First Mac: Mac SE. Current: 15" 2.6 retina MacBook Pro. iPhone 5s. iPad Air.
macidiot is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Cinema Display Versus NEC Versus EIZO mrkennethtong Mac Peripherals 14 May 26, 2014 06:08 PM
Geocities and the rest unplugme71 Community Discussion 11 Nov 9, 2013 09:13 PM
5S in rest of Europe Shishu iPhone 3 Sep 23, 2013 07:33 AM
Buyer's Remorse: New versus old, 1 versus 2 Tfb MacBook Air 27 Jul 17, 2012 06:52 PM
Nano goes into Shuffle even when Shuffle mode is off GanChan iPod 1 Jun 15, 2012 09:00 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC