Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 26, 2011, 08:49 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Sprint Beats Q3 2011 Estimates, Looks Ahead to iPhone Impact [Updated]




Sprint today announced financial results for the third quarter of 2011, and while the carrier did not begin offering the iPhone until after the quarter ended, it was still able to beat analyst estimates and report a smaller-than-expected loss. Perhaps most significantly, Sprint reported a net gain of 1.3 million subscribers during the third quarter, the carrier's best performance in over five years.




Sprint also took the opportunity to tout the iPhone in its press release, citing the device's record-breaking launch and the expectation that iPhone customers will be among the carrier's most profitable.
Quote:
Growth in Sprint brand net additions was achieved without the benefit of Apple's iPhone 4S and iPhone 4, which launched Oct. 14. The launch of this iconic device resulted in Sprint's best ever day of sales in retail, web and telesales for a device family in Sprint history. The response to this device by current and new customers has surpassed initial expectations. The iPhone is expected to be accretive for Sprint, and iPhone users are expected to be among Sprint's most profitable customers.
Overall, Sprint reported a loss of $301 million for the third quarter, down from a $911 million loss in the year-ago quarter. The carrier is said to have committed to purchase over 30 million iPhones over the next four years, with the upfront costs potentially resulting in Sprint taking an initial hit to its financial numbers. But with Sprint expecting strong profits from iPhone service contracts, the carrier anticipates that the iPhone will be a strong contributor to improved financial performance over time as it recoups its initial outlay.

Update: Sprint CEO Dan Hesse reported to Reuters that Sprint will need $7 billion in new financing over the next few years in order to support the iPhone commitment and the network transition to LTE.
Quote:
Sprint said that while the iPhone would cost the company $15 billion in the next four years, it would generate $7 billion to $8 billion in projected future value for Sprint over that period.

Sprint said it will pay Apple an iPhone subsidy that is 40 percent higher, or $200 more per device, than the subsidies it pays for other phones.

But the company's executives said it should be worth the extra cost as the device is bringing in new customers.

"IPhone has an expensive contract but is worth every penny," Hesse said.
Article Link: Sprint Beats Q3 2011 Estimates, Looks Ahead to iPhone Impact [Updated]
MacRumors is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 09:38 AM   #2
kjs862
macrumors 65816
 
kjs862's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
I'm sure their sales with be a to of higher. I know many people that got the Sprint iPhone.
kjs862 is offline   -1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 09:39 AM   #3
justinfreid
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NEW Jersey / USA
 
see vendor information in user profile
Send a message via ICQ to justinfreid Send a message via AIM to justinfreid Send a message via MSN to justinfreid Send a message via Yahoo to justinfreid Send a message via Skype™ to justinfreid
Dollars in, dollars out

Apple's iPhone business model makes it so it's nearly minting money in Cupertino. Seeing the short term financial impact on Sprint of selling the iPhone, comprised of around $550 payments right to Apple for every contract a customer signs, indicates the strong pent up demand for the iPhone on different carriers and that the carriers are still willing to pay that upfront premium to sign up new data users. Apple gets cash stuffed into both pockets.
Kudos to Peter Oppenheimer, Apple's CFO.
__________________
inThirty.net - New, 30 minute, tech podcast on iTunes
JustinFreid.com | Twitter.com/JustinFreid | Facebook.com/JustinFreid
Think different? Install OS X on anything x86 / Jailbreak iOS
justinfreid is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 09:47 AM   #4
Tiger8
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: May 2011
Glad to hear

And I hope next quarter will be even better. I moved back to Sprint with 4s and very happy with them so far.

And their LTE ADVANCE network will hopefully be outstanding!
Tiger8 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 09:57 AM   #5
Shrink
macrumors Demi-God
 
Shrink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjs862 View Post
I'm sure their sales with be a to of higher. I know many people that got the Sprint iPhone.


Now there's a solid scientific method for making sales projections.
__________________
Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. -- Albert Einstein
Shrink is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 10:28 AM   #6
Jerome Morrow
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shrink View Post
[/B]

Now there's a solid scientific method for making sales projections.
Just as good as analyst made one.
Jerome Morrow is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 10:30 AM   #7
mkrishnan
Moderator emeritus
 
mkrishnan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Good for Sprint -- I'm not thinking about using them, but even without, a strong Sprint prevents a duopoly crisis with AT&T and Verizon. I'd like to see T-Mobile get a little stronger, too, or else someone else enter the national post-paid market.
__________________
Mohan
mkrishnan is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 10:31 AM   #8
FaustsHausUK
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Send a message via AIM to FaustsHausUK
With the launch of the 4S, I jumped from AT&T to Sprint and so far, I couldn't be happier.

I don't care that AT&T offer faster theoretical speeds in Chicago. In reality, I get almost no signal for huge chunks of my daily commute so the consistency of Sprint wins out.

Hopefully now they have the iPhone, Sprint will see the success they deserve.
__________________
2011 3.4GHz Core i7 iMac with 16GB RAM | iPhone 5 32GB | iPad Air 32GB
Follow me on Twitter
FaustsHausUK is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 10:37 AM   #9
jav6454
macrumors G5
 
jav6454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaustsHausUK View Post
With the launch of the 4S, I jumped from AT&T to Sprint and so far, I couldn't be happier.

I don't care that AT&T offer faster theoretical speeds in Chicago. In reality, I get almost no signal for huge chunks of my daily commute so the consistency of Sprint wins out.

Hopefully now they have the iPhone, Sprint will see the success they deserve.
Enjoy your 0.15 Mb/s Up/downs
__________________
Al MacBook 2.4GHz Late '08 | 5 S⃣ | Macross Click Me
jav6454 is offline   -3 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 10:42 AM   #10
fruitpunch.ben
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
Sprint said that while the iPhone would cost the company $15 billion in the next four years, it would generate $7 billion to $8 billion in projected future value for Sprint over that period.
How does that work? So they're going to lose 7-8 billion dollars from the iPhone? Sounds like a great way to run a business! Or do they mean it will generate 7-8 billion MORE than the 15 it cost?
__________________
2009 iPhone 3G S⃣ 27" 2009 iMac i7 160 GB intel SSD
11" 2011 MacBook Air i7 1.8GHz,
iPad 3rd Generation 64GB LTE
iPhone 5 64GB Black
fruitpunch.ben is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 10:50 AM   #11
wiz329
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
How will they be losing 7-8 mil over the next 4 years? You'd think if the iphone would ever pay for itself, it would be at least in the service contracts of the next 4 years. When is the iphone supposed to start paying for itself?
wiz329 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 10:50 AM   #12
mkrishnan
Moderator emeritus
 
mkrishnan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by fruitpunch.ben View Post
How does that work? So they're going to lose 7-8 billion dollars from the iPhone? Sounds like a great way to run a business! Or do they mean it will generate 7-8 billion MORE than the 15 it cost?
C|Net offers more detailed analysis here:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-201...hone-4g-plans/

If this inline works...



They are projecting that they will lose money on the iPhone through 2014 and then start making money on it in 2015. Basically, because iPhone users have traditionally been lower turnover and higher revenue (albeit with fewer carrier options in the past), they "should" be able to make money on them in the long term.
__________________
Mohan
mkrishnan is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 10:54 AM   #13
blue22
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Sprint thus far has been great...

Sprint's 3G network is a slightly slower than AT&T's for sure, but it's not that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things.

Overall the network is more consistent and offers better value (unlimited data plan, and free night & weekends starting at 7pm) for similarly priced plans so I'm certain this is going to help Sprint make money/profit off the iPhone in the long run despite their initial upfront commitment. And so far, I've been completely satisfied with their service & network on my iPhone 4S (and I use the web a lot too on the phone) so zero complaints here.
blue22 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 12:24 PM   #14
nagromme
macrumors G4
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Question Sprintís numbers sound wrong

Quote:
Sprint said it will pay Apple an iPhone subsidy that is 40 percent higher, or $200 more per device, than the subsidies it pays for other phones.
Napkin math:

If $200 is 40% more than other phones, that would mean those other phones (many not even smartphones?) get a $500 subsidy each, and the iPhone gets $700. Those numbers sound way too high to me:

* iPhone unlocked prices (4 and 4S) range from $549 to $849.

* iPhone subsidized prices range from $99 to $399.

* So if Apple charges the carriers the full retail unlocked price, minus what the consumer pays up front, then the carrier’s cost would be $450 per iPhone, across the range.

* But in fact, with a mass commitment like this, Sprint probably doesn’t pay full retail price. (Maybe it varies per model.) It’s got to average somewhere less than $450 per iPhone, right?

Yet Sprint says they pay $500 for non-iPhones (including non-smartphones?) on average, and $700 per iPhone?

For that matter, do those other phone makers have a full $200 of extra margin they can give up to the carrier, vs. what Apple gives? Or do their phones cost $200 less to make? (Maybe so, if many aren't smartphones?) All the numbers sound too high to me.

What am I missing? Sprint’s statement does say “pay Apple,” so they’re not factoring in infrastructure, advertising, or other costs when they’re talking about 40% = $200 more.

Just curious.
nagromme is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 12:39 PM   #15
mkrishnan
Moderator emeritus
 
mkrishnan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by nagromme View Post
What am I missing? Sprint’s statement does say “pay Apple,” so they’re not factoring in infrastructure, advertising, or other costs when they’re talking about 40% = $200 more.
I thought it was once rumored that Apple negotiated more for their subsidies essentially as a way to give Apple a share of the monthly revenues the phone generates, but I'm not sure this is true. In that case, it might be that the no commitment / unlocked phone is sort of sold at a lower margin by Apple than the subsidized phones, since they wouldn't make up as much as the carrier pays them. But I'm not sure. On the other hand, this reference:

http://www.wds.co/enlightened/smartp..._wdsglobal.pdf

Estimates that average subsidy paid to the manufacturer by the provider is $200 for all smartphones, so I too tend to think the math is wrong, and they're paying Apple $400-450, which is $200 (more like 100% more) than other smartphones.

As for the component of cost, if it's a higher-end Android phone, it's not going to cost dramatically less than an iPhone to make, and might cost more because the manufacturer lacks Apple's pricing agreements with part suppliers.
__________________
Mohan
mkrishnan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 12:48 PM   #16
RaZaK
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Angry Exactly!!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jav6454 View Post
Enjoy your 0.15 Mb/s Up/downs

I'm switching back to AT&T before my 14 days is up
__________________
"Remember Egypt?" - Max Stone, Extreme Rebel Trillionaire
MBP 17, i7, 8 GB RAM, 640 GB HD
16 GB iPhone 4 Black
MacinDell Mini 9, A05, NBI 0.8.3, 2 GB RAM, 16GB STEC
RaZaK is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 01:45 PM   #17
briankwest77
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by jav6454 View Post
Enjoy your 0.15 Mb/s Up/downs
I'm getting 1.25+ and .60 up most of the time.. I sure enjoy it... thanks.

/b
briankwest77 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 02:25 PM   #18
eastercat
macrumors 68040
 
eastercat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PDX
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

It's interesting that since sprint got the iPhone, my friends have been talking about switching to sprint or have already switched.
Even though the anecdotal evidence isn't scientific, it does indicate a trend that's reflected in sprint's numbers.
__________________
64 GB space grey iPhone 5S (AT&T); 16 GB space grey iPad retina mini (Verizon with T-Mobile sim); 2008 MBP 17" 2.5 GHz Penryn, 4GB RAM, 250GB HD 5400 rpm, 1920x1200 matte LED
eastercat is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 02:43 PM   #19
mrgreen4242
macrumors 601
 
mrgreen4242's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue22 View Post
Sprint's 3G network is a slightly slower than AT&T's for sure, but it's not that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things.

Overall the network is more consistent and offers better value (unlimited data plan, and free night & weekends starting at 7pm) for similarly priced plans so I'm certain this is going to help Sprint make money/profit off the iPhone in the long run despite their initial upfront commitment. And so far, I've been completely satisfied with their service & network on my iPhone 4S (and I use the web a lot too on the phone) so zero complaints here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by briankwest77 View Post
I'm getting 1.25+ and .60 up most of the time.. I sure enjoy it... thanks.

/b
It's all about where you are located. Some places Sprint plenty fast. Others it's not. I just returned (or initiated the return process at least) 3 iPhones to Sprint. Going to switch to ATT next week sometime, once all the return process is finished.
__________________
Mac Pro 4,1, 8x2.26ghz, 10gb, 128gb SSD, 2x750gb (RAID1), 2tb, ATI6750
iPad air 64gb wifi - 16gb iPhone 5s - AppleTV3
mrgreen4242 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 03:19 PM   #20
PPFee
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrgreen4242 View Post
It's all about where you are located. Some places Sprint plenty fast. Others it's not. I just returned (or initiated the return process at least) 3 iPhones to Sprint. Going to switch to ATT next week sometime, once all the return process is finished.
I agree, We need to have an organized list of user experienced speeds by city/zip code. I have been looking all over for sprint iPhone speeds in new orleans area. Hell id even take some data on their average 3g speed in the new orleans area, not just 4s info. I know it won't get me the average 6 down and 1.2 up, my local att dsl maxes out at 6/512, so I'm amazed with the 4s HSDPA speeds, but equally amazed at sprints righteous prices. WHO DAT!
PPFee is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 04:50 PM   #21
funkchiro
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Aus store version?

Error

Last edited by funkchiro; Oct 26, 2011 at 04:51 PM. Reason: Wrong post. Sorry
funkchiro is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2011, 09:32 PM   #22
The Past
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Will they unlock the iPhone when they go belly-up?
The Past is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2011, 02:19 PM   #23
dacapo
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
I don't know what that CEO is taking for medication, but sounds like a terrible investment strategy. Basically they're forecasting a loss of $8+ billion over 4 years to be able to offer the iPhone. And how do they expect to recoup that in years 5 and beyond? It's not like Sprint's iPhone customers will be more loyal to Sprint than to ATT & Verizon.
__________________
2010 13" MBP | iPhone 4s | iPod Touch 4G | ATV2 & ATV3 | iPad2 | iPhone 5
dacapo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2011, 03:08 PM   #24
PPFee
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by dacapo View Post
I don't know what that CEO is taking for medication, but sounds like a terrible investment strategy. Basically they're forecasting a loss of $8+ billion over 4 years to be able to offer the iPhone. And how do they expect to recoup that in years 5 and beyond? It's not like Sprint's iPhone customers will be more loyal to Sprint than to ATT & Verizon.
I think he's getting his meds from AT&T de la vega. Seriously tho, did they actually attribute the entire 8 billion dollar loss to only the iPhone, I've got to believed they tossed in a nice chunk Of money they'll use to transition to a basic LTE footprint. Also as far as loyalty, your right no more loyal are their customers to them, but I do think a lot of their customers are loyal to the almighty dollar, and therefor will stick with sprint unless someone takes their pricing model. They also, in my opinion after selling phones and service from all carriers for years, at the very least In my area, have a strange almost cult-like following in urban areas and amongst the poorer people, at least in new Orleans. I believe it's because of sprints history of having lower deposits, the whole spending limit works well, and of course the cheaper monthly rates.
PPFee is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can an unlocked iPhone be updated adibear Jailbreaks and iOS Hacks 3 Sep 7, 2011 11:37 PM
Help - PowerPoint 2011 on Mac- how to "package to cd" or "pack and go"??? zub3qin Mac Applications and Mac App Store 3 Apr 8, 2011 11:13 PM
Updating to 4.2.1: will I have 4.3-related problems Mr_Brightside_@ Jailbreaks and iOS Hacks 9 Mar 21, 2011 08:39 PM
Looking ahead to the iPad 4 mproudfoot iPad 14 Nov 21, 2010 03:40 PM
Hackers looking forward to iPhone MacBytes MacBytes.com News Discussion 5 Jan 17, 2007 08:10 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC