Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 30, 2011, 12:47 PM   #1
slnko-v-sieti
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Intel: Ivy Bridge "will double battery life"?

This recent news piece from ComputerWorld reiterates ("will double battery life[...]") some claims Intel made about the battery improvements Ivy Bridge will bring to the MBA:

Quote:
CPU and graphics processor will be integrated on a single chip, and deliver double the performance-per-watt compared to Core processors based on the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture[...] users will also see significant power and performance enhancements with Ivy Bridge, which will consume up to half the power at the same performance as current Sandy Bridge chips, said Intel's senior fellow Tom Piazza. Piazza said Ivy Bridge could alternately deliver double the performance on the same power consumption as Sandy Bridge chips, depending on how the chip is used.
For being an incremental update, doesn't doubled battery life (best case scenario) seem like a huge jump?
slnko-v-sieti is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2011, 01:01 PM   #2
thekev
macrumors 603
 
thekev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
They play with their numbers quite a lot. I think double would require more than just cpu/gpu changes. Displays and drives consume a fair amount of power. I'm not sure what the power budget on the Air's SSD is though.

Ivy Bridge is supposed to essentially throttle down when the machine isn't being full utilized. If you're fully taxing the machine, you're unlikely to see a really significant increase in battery life.
thekev is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2011, 03:07 PM   #3
Xikum
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
I read that although they are reducing the power-consumption of the CPUs, they are going to make them more powerful and have more cores; therefore, the extra power that is saved is used to power the 4 individual cores. So there isnt a net increase or decease in actual battery life of the laptop, but instead you get a performance increase without sacrificing battery life.

Could be 100% incorrect though.
Xikum is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2011, 03:41 PM   #4
waloshin
macrumors 68030
 
waloshin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: in my world.
Impossible.
Besides what are we going to have a 700 - 900 mhz Macbook Air?
__________________
Best camera lenses for real estate agents
[/B][/URL]2008 Macbook Unibody 2.4 Ghz Core 2 Duo
waloshin is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2011, 05:23 PM   #5
pgiguere1
macrumors 68000
 
pgiguere1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by waloshin View Post
Impossible.
Besides what are we going to have a 700 - 900 mhz Macbook Air?
This. They talk about double performance per watt. That would mean that they would need to make the chip as fast as a Sandy Bridge to have double the battery life. That would mean underclocking to about half its original frequency.

I bet they won't underclock it, it'll just be faster. But if you wish, underclock it yourself if you like laptops that run cool and last long. I think 2x is a bit too optimistic though.
pgiguere1 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2011, 06:51 PM   #6
jdechko
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Two things about this thread.

1) The original quote doesn't say "double battery life". It talks about double performance, and power savings up to 50%. But it doesn't say IB will double the battery life.

2) CPU performance is only one variable when calculating battery life. Screen brighness and radio antennas (WiFi, Bluetooth & 3G) are also significant contributors. Even the RAM and SSD take up some juice.

Not to say that we won't see improved battery life, but I expect maybe an additional hour or two at most.
jdechko is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2011, 07:14 PM   #7
amarcus
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London, UK
Some good applicable advice to live by: Set your expectations low and you'll always be impressed!

I wouldn't expect more than an hour of extra battery life with Ivy bridge...
amarcus is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 01:09 AM   #8
Scottsdale
macrumors 601
 
Scottsdale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: U.S.A.
It isn't just the CPU that uses the battery though... so it doesn't equate to the MBA's battery lasting twice as long. Running the display has to require a massive amount of the battery itself.
Scottsdale is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 01:18 AM   #9
thejadedmonkey
macrumors 604
 
thejadedmonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pa
Send a message via AIM to thejadedmonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottsdale View Post
It isn't just the CPU that uses the battery though... so it doesn't equate to the MBA's battery lasting twice as long. Running the display has to require a massive amount of the battery itself.
Assuming the CPU can clock down to the current speeds of the current CPU's (which would mean it would use 1/2 the power as current CPU's), and assuming that a CPU uses ~30% of a laptop's power (I heard that years ago), you'd be saving 15% of a laptop's power, or giving the laptop 15% extra runtime... shared with all of the components. So lets say an extra hour, tops. That's not much different from any other previous gen to current gen improvements.

I hope I'm wrong, but somehow my armchare mathmatics feels right.
__________________
MacBook 17" MacBook Pro iPod Nano Apple TV
PS4 Custom Windows 8.1 Desktop WP8.1
"Good judgment comes from experience,
experience comes from bad judgment."
- Mulla Nasrudin
thejadedmonkey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 01:24 AM   #10
eljanitor
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
I've also heard claims that the ivy bridge processor reduces power consumption. I haven't heard that it cuts power consumption in half until reading this.

Also if Apple decides to drop Intel and go with ARM processors in its entire line of products, we may never see the ivy bridge in action in a Mac since it's not supposed to be for sale to the public until Spring of 2012.

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ivy...tor,13753.html
eljanitor is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 04:14 AM   #11
halledise
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hamilton Island, Whitsundays, QLD Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by thekev View Post
They play with their numbers quite a lot.
and some other things too
halledise is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 04:39 AM   #12
Roman2K~
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by eljanitor View Post
Also if Apple decides to drop Intel and go with ARM processors in its entire line of products, we may never see the ivy bridge in action in a Mac since it's not supposed to be for sale to the public until Spring of 2012.
Maybe ARM is the reason why Q1 release dates are rumored despite Ivy Bridge being supposed to arrive early Q2.

That may also be what the switch back to nVidia is all about... They're making quad-core ARM SoCs these days (starting with Tegra 3).

But raw CPU performance would be way below that of Intel's x86 processors. I don't really care about performance so I wouldn't mind given the benefits (battery life, heat).

There's an interesting discussion about the improbability of Apple switching to the ARM architecture in this article.
__________________
rMBP (late 2013): 15", i7 2.0 GHz, 16 GB, 256 GB | iMac (late 2013): 21.5", i5 2.7 GHz, 8 GB, 1 TB FD
Roman2K~ is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 09:11 AM   #13
slnko-v-sieti
Thread Starter
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdechko View Post
1) The original quote doesn't say "double battery life". It talks about double performance, and power savings up to 50%. But it doesn't say IB will double the battery life.
Yeah, that's why I went back to the original, to see if it was really the same claim. It's easy to see where they made the leap in logic.

Thanks for the insights, all. I was really surprised to see that claim not being propagated across news websites, and now it's clear why.
slnko-v-sieti is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 07:27 PM   #14
Aras87
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Impossible. I will be impressed if ivy bridge can add another 30-45mins to the total runtime. In casual use, thanks to Sandy bridge, cpu does not use a lot of power anyway. They have to do something about the screen and the wireless stuff if they really want to improve the battery life drastically.
Aras87 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ivy-Bridge Retina MacBook users: How's your battery life after Mavericks? tmanto02 MacBook Pro 4 Oct 30, 2013 03:00 PM
Ivy Bridge with Mavericks vs Hawell 15 rMBP Battery Life cajer MacBook Pro 2 Oct 25, 2013 01:48 AM
Mac mini 2012 (Ivy bridge) test videos "post yours" ZaYoOoD Mac mini 7 Oct 25, 2012 12:20 PM
2011 13" maxed-out MBA (Sandy Bridge i7) vs. 2012 13" base MBA (Ivy Bridge i5) blumpkin MacBook Air 4 Jul 3, 2012 04:41 PM
Ivy Bridge Pros - Why no Battery Life Improvement? OSMac MacBook Pro 5 Jun 14, 2012 08:52 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC