|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
2GB and 4GB iPod Shuffles? (Unlikely)
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif
Digitimes claims that according to manufacturing sources, Toshiba and Samsung Electronics are planning on aggressively ramping up 8Gbit flash chip production in the coming months. The reason is cited to be Apple's plans to introduce 2GB and 4GB versions of the iPod Shuffle "this June and August". Apple presently offers 512MB and 1GB versions of the iPod Shuffle. Digitimes continues to publish reports but has remained consistently inaccurate with their rumors in the past. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors god
|
only posted because digitimes is frequently cited around the mac web... despite their poor record.
arn |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
I wouldn't mind a 4GB shuffle as long as it has the ability to navigate more than one playlist. Perhaps add a center button?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Demi-God (Moderator)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bergen, Norway
|
I can see there could be a small marked for the 2 GB, but wouldn't the 4 GB be more expensive than the mini? And even if I sometimes shuffle through the 6-700 songs I typically have on my mini, the screen and ability to choose certain playlists is very nice when you got that many songs on it. The mini just makes more sense when we're talking sizes much larger than 1 GB...
__________________
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it;
those who fail to learn history correctly... why, they are simply doomed. |
|
|
| Mitthrawnuruodo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Mitthrawnuruodo |
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Londinium
|
At even 2GB I would think a screen would be necessary, and definately at 4GB. But then, what of the Mini? They'd need a corresponding hike - 8 and 10GB minis?
I agree with the title..... very very unlikely.... |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: On a Higher Spiritual Plane known only to Gods and those who consume large quantities of hallucinogens
|
This would be a maketing release, not a useful one. If you were to buy a 2gb or 4gb shuffle, it would make more sense to buy a mini
__________________
µ
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Burnsville, Minnesota, USA
|
OK. Its going to be asked so we may as well get it out of the way: Why isn’t this page two considering the source?
I’d like to believe this but seriously. Why? At that size you would be eating into the Mini. Personally I think the max you would want to go is 1.5GB. Then jump to 5GB or so with a screen. Honestly, as someone else pointed out, anything above a GB really does need a screen. You aren’t talking a few CD’s at that point. It really is a collection.
__________________
-iPod Video 160GB
-MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.33Ghz/3GB RAM/250GB -Newton 4700 (a.k.a iPaq 4700) -Dell 2405FPW 24" Widescreen Last edited by SiliconAddict : May 27, 2005 at 07:48 AM. |
|
|
| SiliconAddict |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by SiliconAddict |
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Dec 2004
|
No way in hell. Its that simple. If Apple were to update the shuffle, it would be only to 2GB, so the lineup would be a 1GB at $99 and a 2GB at $149. Apple does realize that anything beyond 2GB needs a screen, plus its meant to be an entry level iPod. And like it was said, there would have to be a correspoding mini update, which would be likely to 6GB and 8GB minis, at $199 and $249, respectively. This kind of update would be announced at Macworld more likely than anything.
__________________
PowerBook 12" Rev D - PowerPC G4 1.5GHz, 1.25GB RAM, 80GB HDD, APX/BT, SuperDrive, running Mac OS X Tiger 10.4.8 |
|
|
| gamestriker |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by gamestriker |
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors 65816
|
seems like a crock of **** to me..
(sorry, i've always wanted to use that phrase..)anyway, we all know digitimes have a poor record, and i cant see people going through 1000 songs without a screen / clickwheel - it would just be *too* frustrating. move on people, nothing to see here.. oh, and while we're talking about digitimes, where's my 15" widescreen ibook...yeah, exactly. also, does anyone else think the ipod lineup is getting a bit too complex? i mean, i'm all for choice but when you change the lineup every 3 months it kinda gets a bit annoying..no? Last edited by bousozoku : Oct 26, 2005 at 09:43 PM. Reason: posts next to each other |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Finland
|
Well, if I could have a 2Gb Shuffle for $200, it would sound like a good deal. I still use my ipod (g3 15gb) mostly by letting it shuffle for me.
But 4Gb would definitely be an overkill.
__________________
I was elected to lead, not to read. |
|
|
| Windowlicker |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Windowlicker |
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
If they can squeeze 40GB into the mini form factor, then I would say drop the regular iPods, they are too big. The shuffle is fine the way it is, but perhaps lower the price, or add an additional 10 hours battery life. Oh, btw, Apple should try to aim for 30 hours battery life on the iPod mini.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
__________________
* 17-inch PowerBook, 1.5 GHz G4, OS X 10.5.4 * 2 GB iPod nano silver with Nike+ (his) * 1 GB iPod shuffle pink (hers) Yes we can! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Philadelphia
|
Quote:
AGREED...I think the normal iPod should be gone and the iPod photo should become the normal iPod. Color screens should just be standard. I look forward to buying an iPod mini with a color screen and photo capability.
__________________
-Dennis- MBA, iMac, iPod Touch and a Blackberry Curve...yeah its on Verizon and the 3G works EVERYWHERE "Live to Ride, Ride to Live" |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
or maybe this could become just like an ipod mini, but smaller, and with a crazily high battery life?
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
While I'm with most people that this rumor is likely very false. I wouldn't be surprised to see flash based minis in the future.
__________________
A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head. My Blog Junetech ConfusedYeti |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors 68000
|
2 & 4 Gigs seems too much for a mp3 player without a screen, but it's useful if you use that extra space for portable storage.
Still I doubt it.
__________________
Frisco |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
but wait.. it's more!
Actually, I like the idea of a 2 gb shuffle because I use it not JUST as a MP3 player but it has replaced my flash drive for work... My kids think I am cool because I wear it around my neck and I no longer worry about where my data is. I had a tendency to misplace my flash drive. I never misplace my shuffle.
Oh yeah, and it plays music too. How cool. 2Gb, 4 Gb, bring em on. I will still download just 20 or 50 songs, but cycle through them according to mood.
__________________
Could be worse, I could be stuck with a windows machine. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
We can only hope that this rumor is correct. I will put in a order as soon as it is introduced.
__________________
tamtam My first ever Apple is a 2.5 Ghz G5 with 2.5 Gigs ram, 2x 250GB HD, 9800XT, BT keyboard & mouse. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors member
|
Probably is false.
HOWEVER I have a shuffle and love it ... is is my favorite Apple product ever, if not consumer product in general. I wouldn't mind being able to squeeze a few more song on my shuffle. I 99% of the time use it in shuffle mode, and so no need for a screen. (I sort by recently added and have my newest tracks at the beginning). A 2GB shuffle would be perfect. and a 1GB shuffle for only $99 would be sweet as well. A 512MB really is not much, I bought one for my mom, and she filled it up instantly. I hope it is not true that this will be the "forgotten iPod" ... and at least one increase in GBs would be nice. |
|
|
| sonofpismo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by sonofpismo |
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oxford, UK
|
Cant see how it would make sense to put that much storage in a shuffle - from both financial and usability points of view.
It does make sense that maybe they could squeeze them into an iPod mini though if the cos compared to the HDs made sense...massively improve battery life and with a fair drop in form-factor available. ...so if there is any truth in the rumour, I would hope they've got their shuffle's mixed up with their minis. |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mac since 7.5
|
Page One?
Anyway, I'm all for Apple upping spec's on all hardware, but the Shuffle might not be so viable with much more than the 1GB storage it now has, unless there's a screen in it's future. One of the chief selling points for me about the Shuffle is it's entry level price. If Apple can up capacity to 2GB and 4GB, add the suddenly-really-critical-to-have screen, AND keep it at $99 and $149, I'm all for it. I cry BS.
__________________
Unholy Ferret Invasion is coming to your town!
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
Quote:
Remember when 128 flash drives were thought to be more than enough?
__________________
Could be worse, I could be stuck with a windows machine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
At the moment this is rubbish, a 4gb flash unless they remove the mini or up it to 10gb this is wrong
__________________
Mac Mini Core Duo 1.66, Black 1 GB nano, lanyard headphones and a white tube Don't worry, Be happy - Bobby McFerrin |
|
|
| barneygumble |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by barneygumble |
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors 68000
|
I agree with the others on this site saying that 1 GB and 2GB seems more likely. I'm waiting till the end of the summer to get a Shuffle, and it would be cool if they replaced the 512 with 1GB (not waiting for an update to buy it, just gonna buy it then so you guys don't have to tell me to buy it now and be happy with it
)
|
|
|
| Sharewaredemon |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Sharewaredemon |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|