Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 4, 2005, 10:55 AM   #1
gekko513
macrumors 601
 
gekko513's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Radeon 9600 greatness?

I just got a new iMac G5 2.0GHz with the Radeon 9600 that everyone has been screaming for because it is approximately 5-10% faster than the Geforce 5200 Ultra.

I just figured out why it is faster. I was just doing some OpenGL programming and I wasn't able to draw antialiased polygons in the program, so I went through all kinds of bug hunting to find out why. Eventually I found this:
Quote:
If you are using an ATI 9600, 9700, or 9800, YOU ARE SCREWED.

Polygon antialiasing is NOT AVAILABLE on these cards. Hooray for "progress".


Thomas Fortier <TFortier@ati.com> writes:
Quote:
The Radeon 9600 and later cards from ATI have no hardware support for AA
polygons, so unfortunately there is nothing that can be done to address this
missing driver feature.

As far as AA points and lines go, those features are present in the
hardware, but not yet exposed by our GL drivers. We do have plans to
implement them, but I can't comment on when drivers will be released with
those features supported.


Yes, this breaks many existing applications. No, ATI doesn't give a ****.
Maybe I'm silly but I do prefer a 5-10% slower card that actually does what it's told and doesn't cheat by drawing aliased graphics when the program wants to draw antialiased.
__________________
Someone get Nekkid™, now!
gekko513 is offline   0
Old Jun 4, 2005, 01:52 PM   #2
dubbz
macrumors 68020
 
dubbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Alta, Norway
Heh. ATI have sucky OGL support regardless of OS
__________________
"If a tree falls in the forest... I'll kill the bastard what done it!" - Jaheira
dubbz is offline   0
Old Jun 4, 2005, 03:41 PM   #3
Rod Rod
macrumors 68020
 
Rod Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
I noticed a huge difference when I upgraded the FX 5200 in my DP Power Mac G5 to a 9600XT. Motion (the app) runs much better compared to before.

Do you know whether the x800 draws AA graphics?
__________________
the year of HD
Rod Rod is offline   0
Old Jun 4, 2005, 05:25 PM   #4
gekko513
Thread Starter
macrumors 601
 
gekko513's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod Rod
Do you know whether the x800 draws AA graphics?
I'm not sure. The post I quoted from iDevGames forum mentions only the 9000-series, so maybe the X800 doesn't suffer from this crippling of features, but it's hard to tell for sure just based on this.
__________________
Someone get Nekkid™, now!
gekko513 is offline   0
Old Jun 4, 2005, 09:51 PM   #5
Etrain
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Cleve
I can't compare the 9600 with the 5200 but compared to my old GeForceMX 400, the 9600 rocks! I'm very pleased with the graphics capabilities. I don't play many games however, but the ones I have played where very nice.
Etrain is offline   0
Old Jun 4, 2005, 11:33 PM   #6
Hoef
macrumors 6502a
 
Hoef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX..... (keep walking)
Hey Gekko513,
Can you explain to the graphics challenged, such as myself, what we are missing: why is drawing aliased graphics when the program wants to draw antialiased bad? Tx!
Hoef is offline   0
Old Jun 4, 2005, 11:51 PM   #7
homerjward
macrumors 68030
 
homerjward's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: fig tree
Send a message via AIM to homerjward
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoef
Hey Gekko513,
Can you explain to the graphics challenged, such as myself, what we are missing: why is drawing aliased graphics when the program wants to draw antialiased bad? Tx!
yeah, and would this affect its ability to run a 3d modeling program like lightwave? i was under the impression that the 9 series were really good gpu's especially the 9600 9700 and 9800
__________________
Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.
homerjward is offline   0
Old Jun 5, 2005, 06:26 AM   #8
gekko513
Thread Starter
macrumors 601
 
gekko513's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
This is bad because for many existing and upcoming applications that use OpenGL, the quality of the graphics will be worse if you have a Radeon 9x00.

Basically, in some apps, like mine, edges will look like jagged as shown to the left with a Radeon card, and smoother as shown to the right with other graphics cards.


For games it usually doesn't matter because most don't use antialiasing unless it's full scene antialiasing. The Radeon cards do support full scene antialiasing, but it's not practical to use in all situations because it uses alot of GPU power and VRAM.

I don't know how much it will effect 3d modelling apps like Lightwave. It depends on whether Lightwave uses polygon antialising for anything.
__________________
Someone get Nekkid™, now!

Last edited by gekko513; Jun 5, 2005 at 06:28 AM.
gekko513 is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Resolved: G4 MDD using a G5 Radeon 9600 gavinstubbs09 PowerPC Macs 2 Feb 15, 2014 03:54 AM
iPad: iPad 4 is greatness! brig2221 iPad 45 Nov 17, 2012 05:20 PM
Resolved: Advantages of a Radeon 9800 Pro vs. Radeon 9600XT? alexreich PowerPC Macs 29 Jul 30, 2012 02:43 PM
Ati radeon 9600 xt help toothpaste PowerPC Macs 2 Jun 5, 2012 06:36 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC