Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 7, 2005, 03:43 AM   #1
thedoc1111
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Apple Intel machines won't use Open Firmware

Update: The Development Kit does have a BIOS! Damn.

And will probably boot Windows - so they will have a traditional BIOS.

So we are left with the COMPLETE x86 architecture in our Macs - no modernisation, dealing with the appallingly implemented ACPI and APM standards for Power Management, the lot.

What's worse is that, if this is true, the only way that they will stop you running OS X on your no-name PC or Dell - is most likely DRM...

Sources:
http://developer.apple.com/documenta...sal_binary.pdf
==> 'Macintosh computers using Intel microprocessors do not use Open Firmware. Although many parts of the IO registry are present and work as expected, information that is provided by Open Firmware on a Macintosh using a PowerPC microprocessor (such as a complete device tree) is not available in the IO registry on a Macintosh using an Intel microprocessor. You can obtain some of the information from IODeviceTree by using the sysctlbyname or sysctl commands.'

http://news.com.com/Apple+throws+the...ml?tag=st.next
==> 'After Jobs' presentation, Apple Senior Vice President Phil Schiller addressed the issue of running Windows on Macs, saying there are no plans to sell or support Windows on an Intel-based Mac. "That doesn't preclude someone from running it on a Mac. They probably will," he said. "We won't do anything to preclude that." '

Last edited by thedoc1111; Jun 9, 2005 at 11:36 AM.
thedoc1111 is offline   0
Old Jun 7, 2005, 04:05 AM   #2
thedoc1111
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
One more bit of good/bad news:

Apple will support GCC for Universal Binaries (no Intel proprietary compiler)
However, it will only be GCC 4.0 - meaning large OSS projects which do not compile yet on GCC 4.0 will be left in the lurch and so put back again
thedoc1111 is offline   0
Old Jun 7, 2005, 04:32 AM   #3
wrldwzrd89
macrumors G4
 
wrldwzrd89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solon, OH
Actually, I don't think there will be any sort of DRM. All that is necessary is to limit the hardware supported by Mac OS X to the hardware in the machines Apple offers. That will be enough to make running Mac OS X on anything not configured identically to a Mac not work.
__________________
iMac Intel (Rev H, 27"), 1TB HDD, 16GB RAM, 10.8.4
wrldwzrd89 is offline   0
Old Jun 7, 2005, 04:36 AM   #4
weg
macrumors 6502a
 
weg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: nj
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedoc1111
"That doesn't preclude someone from running it on a Mac. They probably will," he said. "We won't do anything to preclude that."
Yeah, and once Apple will provide the iLife Applications for Windows there won't be any reason to stick to Mac OS X on your Apple MacIntel anymore. Apple can make another transition from Mac OS X to Longhorn, then (probably 2008?).
__________________
- weg
weg is offline   0
Old Jun 7, 2005, 05:20 AM   #5
cube
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: May 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrldwzrd89
Actually, I don't think there will be any sort of DRM. All that is necessary is to limit the hardware supported by Mac OS X to the hardware in the machines Apple offers. That will be enough to make running Mac OS X on anything not configured identically to a Mac not work.
One word: VIRTUALIZATION
cube is offline   0
Old Jun 7, 2005, 08:39 AM   #6
Applespider
macrumors 603
 
Applespider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: looking through rose-tinted spectacles...
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedoc1111
And will probably boot Windows - so they will have a traditional BIOS.'
I thought Intel were trying to convince manufacturers to move away from BIOS to EFI

From a while ago but suggests EFI standard by 2007 which is the right timescalle
__________________
Oops.... the cat killed the rabbit
Applespider is offline   0
Old Jun 7, 2005, 09:23 AM   #7
GroundLoop
macrumors 68000
 
GroundLoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrldwzrd89
Actually, I don't think there will be any sort of DRM. All that is necessary is to limit the hardware supported by Mac OS X to the hardware in the machines Apple offers. That will be enough to make running Mac OS X on anything not configured identically to a Mac not work.
This would still allow companies to create Mac clones. In my opinion (since I can't speak for Apple), this will NOT be tolerated. IF the system uses a run of the mill BIOS, there will likely be a proprietary hardware component that differentiates a Mac from a Dell with the same major components of a Mac. Whether that is some kind of chip on the logic board, who knows. But, Apple will not be throwing away their hardware business with this transition.

Hickman
GroundLoop is offline   0
Old Jun 7, 2005, 11:57 AM   #8
wrldwzrd89
macrumors G4
 
wrldwzrd89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solon, OH
Good points. In that case, I suspect Apple will replace ACPI with their own proprietary power manager - the one that gives us instant sleep and instant wake. That is something Windows does not support and that Mac OS X requires to function. Apple might add other things too, but that one I'm almost certain will appear in Intel-based Macs.
__________________
iMac Intel (Rev H, 27"), 1TB HDD, 16GB RAM, 10.8.4
wrldwzrd89 is offline   0
Old Jun 7, 2005, 12:08 PM   #9
strider42
macrumors 65816
 
strider42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by weg
Yeah, and once Apple will provide the iLife Applications for Windows there won't be any reason to stick to Mac OS X on your Apple MacIntel anymore. Apple can make another transition from Mac OS X to Longhorn, then (probably 2008?).
wait, what? where did the logical leap come from from windows being able to be installed to iLife being released for windows. Apple sells hardware, and the major selling point of that hardware is OS X. If they just sell a windows box, there's no reason to pay a premium anymore and everyone will just get a dell. I can't see apple doing it.
__________________
It's these little things, they can pull you under.
Live your life filled with joy and thunder.
strider42 is offline   0
Old Jun 7, 2005, 12:57 PM   #10
Sun Baked
macrumors G5
 
Sun Baked's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Hickman
This would still allow companies to create Mac clones. In my opinion (since I can't speak for Apple), this will NOT be tolerated. IF the system uses a run of the mill BIOS, there will likely be a proprietary hardware component that differentiates a Mac from a Dell with the same major components of a Mac. Whether that is some kind of chip on the logic board, who knows. But, Apple will not be throwing away their hardware business with this transition.

Hickman
Amiga, before they went bankrupt again recently.

Was planning on using USB dongles supplied with white box PowerPC G3/G4s.

Since Apple is building the entire machine, nothing is stopping them from putting a device internally on the USB or PCI bus.

USB would probably be best, since that would allow them to offer a $99-$199 Mac dongle in the future to allow the Mac OS to run on non Apple PCs.

An option Apple would likely love to have if MS kills Office.

---

Right now the only place to run the Mac OS will be on a Apple PC, but on the flip side Windows would also run on any Apple PC.

So this time around, more people than Mac OS users will be buying Apple hardware.

Make no bones about it, it's no longer a Mac -- it is Apple's first Apple PC.

And people will likely work hard to get around Apple's DRM, but Apple will also be limiting the driver base.

So a $200 Dell probably wouldn't run the Mac OS even with a DRM hack.

Ask the NeXT x86 users, they had to hunt down hardware that worked with the NeXT OS just to build a machine. Wasn't always easy.
__________________
If you are the type of person who solves all their problems with a hammer, because it is the only tool in your toolbox. It would be wise of you to never get in an argument with a gunsmith.

Last edited by Sun Baked; Jun 7, 2005 at 01:17 PM.
Sun Baked is offline   0
Old Jun 7, 2005, 01:16 PM   #11
y0zza
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
I would expect Apple to use Intel's much-touted EFI. I just hope FW target mode is still there...
y0zza is offline   0
Old Jun 9, 2005, 11:31 AM   #12
thedoc1111
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
And they do have BIOS!

http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/

Top Article at the moment...

Never buying a Mac with BIOS, sorry.
thedoc1111 is offline   0
Old Jun 9, 2005, 11:53 AM   #13
kgarner
macrumors 68000
 
kgarner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Utah
Just because the developer transition machines has a BIOS doesn't mean that the Macintels will. We are comparing a future product to a stop-gap measure to allow developers to try out their code. I'm not saying that Apple won't use a BIOS, but just because the dev machines do means that the official Macintels will. Only time will tell. We are talking about a machine we won't see for at least 6 months, maybe longer.
__________________
Mac Pro 2.66 Quad | Mini 1.42 G4 (running as HTPC)
digitalsandbox.net
"Monkeys are like bacon. They improve just about anything." -Andy Ihnatko
kgarner is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buyers beware - Apple won't replace defective machines, even when they can't fix them aeolid iMac 70 May 3, 2014 06:44 AM
iphoto won't open (after trying to open a different library) gavstephenson Mac Applications and Mac App Store 2 Mar 21, 2014 07:26 PM
Apple mail links won't open igneousc OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion 2 Dec 8, 2012 12:44 AM
system preferences won't open, macbook won't wake up RioAsks MacBook Pro 2 Aug 1, 2012 08:54 AM
open firmware password, ML...anyone? fisherking OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion 2 Jul 25, 2012 04:40 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC