Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple Expected to Adopt 802.11ac 5G Gigabit Wi-Fi This Year

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,469
30,689



​

AppleInsider claims that Apple is planning on incorporating support for the new faster 802.11ac Wi-Fi specification into products this year.
The new 802.11ac standard achieves much faster wireless networking speeds than the existing 802.11n specification (in use on the latest Mac, AirPort and iOS devices) by using 2 to 4 times the frequency bandwidth (from 80 to 160MHz), more efficient data transfers through sophisticated modulation, and more antennas (up to 8; existing standards support up to 4, while Apple's Macs currently use up to 3).
Click to expand...
This "Gigabit WiFi" offers speeds 3 times as fast as existing 802.11n wireless networks can with speeds of over 1 Gigabit per second.

Despite the specification not being finalized, Broadcom has already announced a family of chips supporting 802.11ac Wi-Fi. The final specification is expected to be certified in the second half of this year.

Apple and other manufacturers have been known to deploy un-finalized wireless technology in the past. Apple deployed 802.11n in new AirPort base stations years before the official standard certification.

Article Link: Apple Expected to Adopt 802.11ac 5G Gigabit Wi-Fi This Year
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2012/01/23/apple-expected-to-adopt-802-11ac-5g-gigabit-wi-fi-this-year/
DanielCoffey

DanielCoffey

macrumors 65816
Nov 15, 2010
1,207
30
Edinburgh, UK
How will this work in congested wifi signal areas?

It is bad enough maintaining a clean signal when my neighbours use 40MHz, let alone 80 to 160MHz
 
wikus

wikus

macrumors 68000
Jun 1, 2011
1,795
2
Planet earth.
If this means faster transfer speeds to an external hard drive connected to an Airport Extreme via USB port, I'll easily make the purchase.

I have 1.3TB of data on my shared drive, and on a weekly basis about 20-40gb of data is transferred to the drive. Watching files copy at 5-10mb/s is pretty sad.
 
OriginalMacRat

OriginalMacRat

macrumors 6502a
Mar 9, 2007
591
863
Ethernet

Waiting for 10Gbs ethernet myself.

1Gbs ethernet is getting a little slow for moving media over a LAN.
 
macduke

macduke

macrumors G5
Jun 27, 2007
13,129
19,648
Will this standard support the bandwidth capable of wireless video mirroring of a hypothetical retina iPad 3 using a hypothetical Apple TV 3?

Another thing—is it too much to ask that the numbering system for these “standards” go “a, b, c, d, e…” instead of “a, b, g, n, ac”? Because in 15 years we’ll end up with something stupid like 802.11no.

I know people like my grandma will ask “is n newer than ac?”

And another thing—I wish USB updated this often. Make everything backwards compatible like it is now but just update the speed every few years instead of waiting. Then most computers today would have at least a fairly speedy USB port compared to 2.0.
 
SDAVE

SDAVE

macrumors 68040
Jun 16, 2007
3,573
599
Nowhere
OriginalMacRat said:
Waiting for 10Gbs ethernet myself.

1Gbs ethernet is getting a little slow for moving media over a LAN.
Click to expand...

It's effectively 90MB/sec with overhead. That's slow for you?

Unless you're using GbE for pro use, then that's another issue. Fiber is good for that kind of stuff.
 
Rodimus Prime

Rodimus Prime

macrumors G4
Oct 9, 2006
10,136
4
wikus said:
If this means faster transfer speeds to an external hard drive connected to an Airport Extreme via USB port, I'll easily make the purchase.

I have 1.3TB of data on my shared drive, and on a weekly basis about 20-40gb of data is transferred to the drive. Watching files copy at 5-10mb/s is pretty sad.
Click to expand...

Well considering that 5-10 mb/s is going to be around 0.5-1 gigabit/ s speeds the answer is no because you are bumping against the max speed of the network that having on 20% overhead is being nice as local laws and wifi tend to not care about having extra overhead as they have space to burn.
 
Macman45

Macman45

macrumors G5
Jul 29, 2011
13,197
135
Somewhere Back In The Long Ago
DanielCoffey said:
How will this work in congested wifi signal areas?

It is bad enough maintaining a clean signal when my neighbours use 40MHz, let alone 80 to 160MHz
Click to expand...

In actual fact. the 5GHZ band takes you AWAY from congestion. The 2.4 band is where the interference is at present. My TC operating at 5GHZ and 2.4 (it auto switches) gives a far better connection on my IOS devices than the older standard ever could.
 
Icaras

Icaras

macrumors 603
Mar 18, 2008
6,344
3,383
Jayse said:
Bring it on Apple! This will definitely lead to better airplay streaming of movies, and hopefully Mac -> ATV 1080p streaming!
Click to expand...

Exactly what I was thinking. This should open the door for 1080p content in iTunes content too.
 
S

spacepower7

macrumors 68000
May 6, 2004
1,509
1
Logical speculation, no sources though. Hopefully it will be included in Ivy Bridge 2012 Mac Upgrades as well as a 2012 base station upgrades at the same time.
 
F

FrankHahn

macrumors 6502a
May 17, 2011
735
2
I hope that the speed can be promoted up to 10 Gb/s very soon. Then, a computer display, such as an Apple Thunderbolt Display with WIFI capability, can be connected to a desktop computer, such as a Mac Pro or a Mac mini, through WIFI, which will be the beginning of a new computing era.
 
Quu

Quu

macrumors 68040
Apr 2, 2007
3,420
6,792
Any wireless improvement is good to me. The 130Mb/ps I get on 2.4GHz N isn't really fast enough for me. I hate accessing large files or doing time machine backups to my server over WiFi. Time Machine alone goes 5-6x faster over 1Gb ethernet from my Desktop -> Server as my Notebook -> Server (WiFi).
 
A

ArmCortexA8

macrumors 65816
Feb 18, 2010
1,074
205
Terra Australis
This sounds good, but without a ratified standard this means possible issues later on, where a simple firmware upgrade may not suffice, especially if newer Broadcom chips are released (newer revisions) this means that multiple versions will be available without the consumers knowledge.

Remember 802.11n took over 7 years to be ratified, and never heard the end of companies releasing "draft" hardware for this standard, and compatibility issues later arising due to different chip revisions inside different brands of hardware.

As usual the trick of this is to hold back till 802.11ac is fully ratified.
 
O

odedia

macrumors 65816
Nov 24, 2005
1,043
149
MacRumors said:
The new 802.11ac standard achieves much faster wireless networking speeds than the existing 802.11n specification (in use on the latest Mac, AirPort and iOS devices) by using 2 to 4 times the frequency bandwidth (from 80 to 160MHz), more efficient data transfers through sophisticated modulation, and more antennas (up to 8; existing standards support up to 4, while Apple's Macs currently use up to 3).
Click to expand...

Cook me up, Scotty.

:)
 
sammich

sammich

macrumors 601
Sep 26, 2006
4,305
268
Sarcasmville.
macduke said:
Will this standard support the bandwidth capable of wireless video mirroring of a hypothetical retina iPad 3 using a hypothetical Apple TV 3?

Another thing—is it too much to ask that the numbering system for these “standards” go “a, b, c, d, e…” instead of “a, b, g, n, ac”? Because in 15 years we’ll end up with something stupid like 802.11no.

I know people like my grandma will ask “is n newer than ac?”

And another thing—I wish USB updated this often. Make everything backwards compatible like it is now but just update the speed every few years instead of waiting. Then most computers today would have at least a fairly speedy USB port compared to 2.0.
Click to expand...

The 802.11 standards set implements wireless technologies in a set of frequencies. Each of the letters you see after '802.11' count up alphabetically from the first incarnation of the standard. 'a' and 'b' you're familiar with, 'c' to 'f' and 'h' to 'k' cover other standards that the 802.11 group have created to work with wireless LANs.

802.11i is the standard that deals with security, most notably WPA2 and WPS. So when they decide to create a new speed of WLAN, other letters have been used to represent those other standards.

All that said, yes, they could easily have a 'consumerised' naming system like USB has (High-Speed and SuperSpeed). But with 5 'speeds' of wireless, even this system could be a bit overwhelming. Just understand that, the bigger the value in alphabet-base counting, the faster...
 
Last edited:
M

MacDarcy

macrumors 65816
Jul 21, 2011
1,011
819
Well....since I am waiting for it.....heres to hoping this makes it into the iPad 3 hee hee hee. :p
 
KnightWRX

KnightWRX

macrumors Pentium
Jan 28, 2009
15,046
4
Quebec, Canada
FrankHahn said:
I hope that the speed can be promoted up to 10 Gb/s very soon. Then, a computer display, such as an Apple Thunderbolt Display with WIFI capability, can be connected to a desktop computer, such as a Mac Pro or a Mac mini, through WIFI, which will be the beginning of a new computing era.
Click to expand...

Welcome to last year :

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/intel-wireless-display.html

WiDi does just this, it's Intel's implementation of the WirelessHD protocol (60 Ghz or if you will, IEEE what 802.11ad will define under the umbrella of WiGig, a competitor of WirelessHD).

On-topic : It will be nice to get a bump up from 802.11n, but frankly wireless is abysmal regardless and reaching the theoritcal top speeds is never easy, even standing next to the base stations. I do get a giggle in these threads when the uninitiated though think we can't really do stuff like stream "1080p full HD" without these advances. 1080p streams just fun already over 802.11n, it's not a matter of pixels but of compression and bitrates.

----------
sammich said:
The 802.11 standards set implements wireless technologies in a set of frequencies. Each of the letters you see after '802.11' count up alphabetically from the first incarnation of the standard. 'a' and 'b' you're familiar with, 'c' to 'f' and 'h' to 'k' cover other standards that the 802.11 group have created to work with wireless LANs.
Click to expand...

Just to further drive the point home :

IEEE 802.11a: 54 Mbit/s, 5 GHz standard (1999, shipping products in 2001)
IEEE 802.11b: Enhancements to 802.11 to support 5.5 and 11 Mbit/s (1999)
IEEE 802.11c: Bridge operation procedures; included in the IEEE 802.1D standard (2001)
IEEE 802.11d: International (country-to-country) roaming extensions (2001)
IEEE 802.11e: Enhancements: QoS, including packet bursting (2005)
IEEE 802.11F: Inter-Access Point Protocol (2003) Withdrawn February 2006
IEEE 802.11g: 54 Mbit/s, 2.4 GHz standard (backwards compatible with b) (2003)
IEEE 802.11h: Spectrum Managed 802.11a (5 GHz) for European compatibility (2004)
IEEE 802.11i: Enhanced security (2004)
IEEE 802.11j: Extensions for Japan (2004)
IEEE 802.11-2007: A new release of the standard that includes amendments a, b, d, e, g, h, i & j. (July 2007)
IEEE 802.11k: Radio resource measurement enhancements (2008)
IEEE 802.11n: Higher throughput improvements using MIMO (multiple input, multiple output antennas) (September 2009)
IEEE 802.11p: WAVE—Wireless Access for the Vehicular Environment (such as ambulances and passenger cars) (July 2010)
IEEE 802.11r: Fast BSS transition (FT) (2008)
IEEE 802.11s: Mesh Networking, Extended Service Set (ESS) (July 2011)
IEEE 802.11T: Wireless Performance Prediction (WPP)—test methods and metrics Recommendation cancelled
IEEE 802.11u: Interworking with non-802 networks (for example, cellular) (February 2011)
IEEE 802.11v: Wireless network management (February 2011)
IEEE 802.11w: Protected Management Frames (September 2009)
IEEE 802.11y: 3650–3700 MHz Operation in the U.S. (2008)
IEEE 802.11z: Extensions to Direct Link Setup (DLS) (September 2010)
IEEE 802.11mb: Maintenance of the standard; will become 802.11-2011 (~ December 2011)
IEEE 802.11aa: Robust streaming of Audio Video Transport Streams (~ March 2012)
IEEE 802.11ac: Very High Throughput <6 GHz;[22] potential improvements over 802.11n: better modulation scheme (expected ~10% throughput increase); wider channels (80 or even 160 MHz), multi user MIMO;[23] (~ December 2012)
IEEE 802.11ad: Very High Throughput 60 GHz (~ Dec 2012) - see WiGig
IEEE 802.11ae: QoS Management (~ Dec 2011)
IEEE 802.11af: TV Whitespace (~ Mar 2012)
IEEE 802.11ah: Sub 1Ghz (~ July 2013)
IEEE 802.11ai: Fast Initial Link Setup (~ Sep 2014)
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11#Standard_and_amendments

Notice how 802.11ac isn't due for ratification until December 2012. So if Apple offers it before that, we'll be getting a "draft" implementation like we did with the original 802.11n.
 
KnightWRX

KnightWRX

macrumors Pentium
Jan 28, 2009
15,046
4
Quebec, Canada
Aeolius said:
What happened to 802.22?
Click to expand...

Why would that have anything to do with computer/device local networking ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.22

IEEE 802.22 is a standard for Wireless Regional Area Network (WRAN) using white spaces in the TV frequency spectrum.[1] The development of the IEEE 802.22 WRAN standard is aimed at using cognitive radio (CR) techniques to allow sharing of geographically unused spectrum allocated to the Television Broadcast Service, on a non-interfering basis, to bring broadband access to hard-to-reach, low population density areas, typical of rural environments, and is therefore timely and has the potential for a wide applicability worldwide.
Click to expand...
 
sanke1

sanke1

macrumors 65816
Nov 9, 2010
1,067
436
10 Gigabit Ethernet is where my money will be. I spent enough getting N900 routers to get any significant benefits of transfer speeds. I can currently transfer 80-90 read and 40-50 write from NAS over Gigabit LAN. I am hungry for speed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom