|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Apple Developing Numbers?
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif
AppleInsider reports that Apple has requested a standard character mark for "Numbers" and is currently working on a spreadsheet application to possibly supplement the iWork application suite. Sales of the iWork suite dropped significantly after release, with analysts believeing that the problem (among others) was the lack of a spreadsheet element. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors god
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: nowhere near the infinite loop anymore
|
It's about time...I won't even consider iWork until they have a spreadsheet application.
|
|
|
| WildCowboy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by WildCowboy |
|
|
#3 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Apr 2004
|
Quote:
I use keynotes more than anything... so I would have bought it either way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: mi
|
Quote:
It would be nice to see an alternative to Excel, but I have my doubts to how well it can be... hate Microsoft all you want, but Excel is pretty good at what it does... <edit> what would be nice, now that I think about it, is if apple did to Numbers what they did with pages - not targetting excel, but rather targetting the home user, and setting up an easy to use system, with templates that do what the average home user might want from a spreadsheet. I'm comfy using spreadsheets all day long, but if you sit my wife in front of one, she's dumbfounded as to what to do... but if Apple did it up right... it could be a very usefull tool, even for peeps like my wife...
__________________
oh, and no, i don't j-walk |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
![]() With the current name it needs to be an Office killer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jun 2005
|
Stand up, Improv?
I wish they would ressurect Lotus Improv. It was a spreadsheet/database application that shipped with the NeXT. It was, in my opinion, ahead of its time because everyone wanted a spreadsheet that looked like Excel. Perhaps now it's time to bring it back?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_Improv http://infocom.cqu.edu.au/Staff/Mich...us_improv.html |
|
|
| BarryBrown |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BarryBrown |
|
|
#7 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jun 2005
|
Improv was great!
Quote:
Bring back Improv. Amazing product for NeXt all written in Cocoa. |
|
|
|
| SorcerersAppren |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by SorcerersAppren |
|
|
#8 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England
|
Quote:
Even if it's not that, Excel is way more than most home users need, and I would welcome an addition to iWork. And Pages? I haven't used it yet but just remember it's at Version 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
Quote:
Last edited by iMeowbot : Jun 16, 2005 at 06:03 PM. Reason: ty |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jun 2005
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
macrumors 68040
|
Quote:
Excel is often used as a page layout program and often as a simple database. Filemaker on the other hand I've seen used as a spread sheet. Both can do the function of the other but not well. I was expecting to hear about a a spreadsheet app but no luck. Apple needs it if they expect iWork to compete. I haven't used pages so I can't comment on its quality.
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be. |
|
|
|
| MongoTheGeek |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MongoTheGeek |
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
Is there evidence that Numbers is actually a spreadsheet program? There have been rumors of Apple developing a spreadsheet app and rumors of them developing a financial app. iWork was initially rumored to be an invoicing application.
Numbers could be a home and small business budgeting/finances/billing application. The name Numbers has more of an association with money and budgeting than a spreadsheet, which can be extremely versatile. This would have a far wider appeal to most of Apple's market (home users, small businesses, freelancers, design studios, etc.) than a spreadsheet program, even though a spreadsheet program can be set up to do all of those things. There was a market for an artfully done, focused presentation program that Apple has filled. I feel there is a market for an artfully done, focused document building program that Apple may be able to fill. Is there a market for an artfully done, focused spreadsheet program? Who truly needs that? People that need a spreadsheet app need the power and flexibility that Excel offers. Most don't need power in a word processing or a presentation application. Meanwhile, look at iTunes, iPhoto, iCal, etc. It looks kind of like Apple has been incorporating specific-use, speadsheet-like environments into many of the apps we already use. I realize these are not spreadsheets, but to 80% of people looking at them, that's what they would use to a spreadsheet application for. Is it possible Apple is already showing us the extent of their speadsheet intentions by applying spreadsheet-like middleman to purposeful applications? Last edited by Lead Belly : Jun 17, 2005 at 12:41 AM. |
|
|
| Lead Belly |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Lead Belly |
|
|
#13 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| NtotheIzoo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by NtotheIzoo |
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
Last edited by roadapple : Jun 16, 2005 at 03:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
When iWork was announced I thought it was a pretty good idea (particularly in terms of its price) but the one thing it was missing, as an office application suite for those that don't need Office 2004, was a spreadsheet. Everyone uses a spreadsheet these days even at home and the lack of one in iWork was the reason why I wasn't as impressed as I should have been. Since I already own Office 2004 I think it is unlikely that I will ever buy a copy of iWork (even with Numbers) but if it was added into the standard application bundle with a new Mac then it would be another great reason to buy Apple. iLife is already regarded as a major selling point for the Mac Mini and iMac, so iWork would really help.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Victoria, BC
|
A somewhat related comment... apparently the next version of Office will create XML documents.
If this is true, it may be a bit easier for companies to create better working importers and exporters for your standard slew of MS Office documents. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
|
Pages doesn't fit into what a nicely made Cocoa app from Apple should look like to me. It is not intuitive at all, taking a while for me to do anything with it. Apple needs to clean Pages up before i start to use it.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In your head.
|
It would also be nice if iWork came with a DB management/creation tool.
A spreadsheet application is a must, and I don't know how they missed on that one. Heck, AppleWorks had word-processing, data base, and spread sheet capability and that was with 64k. -We went to the moon on 64k! Sorry, brain hiccup.- These days those applications are jokes with the power that other programs offer, but they worked. Wow, what a screw up. If VisiCalc was the first killer app for personal computers, then why would Apple not create a spread sheet program for iWork. Last edited by Eniregnat : Jun 16, 2005 at 03:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
|
I think we can all agree that a spreadsheet app is a crucial element to an office suite. If Apple creates am Pages/spreadsheet/Keynote office suite, I think it would do VERY good against Microsh*t Office.
Last edited by Mudbug : Jun 16, 2005 at 04:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
Granted there are many odds and ends, and Pages can be significantly cleaned up and improved on the UI front, but I found things in Pages a lot more accessible than in Word. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
Speaking of reinventing the wheel, you do realise Filemaker is a subsidary of Apple?
Of course, Excel is not a database app (well not really, anyways), Access is. Why are you talking about Apple making a database app?
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
|
Originally posted by BarryBrown
Quote:
It was really intuitive, and allowed you to sort data in an amazing number of ways. Looking back, it had a similar feel to a lot of current Apple apps. Unfortunately it had to compete with Lotus 123 as well as Excel, in what was, even then, a fairly well-established market. But if Steve Jobs wants to borrow my 3 discs and the manual for research purposes I still have them............ |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton/Alberta/Canada
|
not intuitive?
Quote:
Pages is what it is,...and it's way more intuative than Word. Besides InDesign&Quark for pro stuff,...i have not used word since Pages came out. Even my die hard MS Office corporate wife converted. It's got room to grow though. |
|
|
|
| speleoterra |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by speleoterra |
|
|
#24 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East Stroudsburg, PA
|
Quote:
__________________
My Configuration: Vonage VOIP with 7MBps Cable Internet iBook 1.33 GHz ComboDrive iMac 800MHz SuperDrive iPod 5th Gen 60GB 2 Hughes DVR2 TiVo Receivers 1 Phillips DSR6000 TiVo Receiver |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Iowa
|
No hoops; just common sense.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|