Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 17, 2005, 04:40 PM   #1
Onkelskrue
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Portable Raid for PB 15 1.67

Hi,
I am about to get a PB for mobile video editing. I need the portability, so I can't really go with a PM. My thoughts were using two 2.5 notebook HDs in a RAID 0 configuration, hooking them up to the firewire connection.

Question 1 - have anyone done such a thing before?
Question 2 - does anyone know of a dual notebook HD enclosure?
Question 3 - would the firewire connection have enough power to run 2 HDs?

Thougths?

Thanks,
Lars
Onkelskrue is offline   0
Old Jun 17, 2005, 05:58 PM   #2
PeterBonnar
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
http://www.g-technology.com/products/g-raid.cfm

small portable and raid.

Is this the sort of thing you want?


maybe you mean for it to be battery powered?
PeterBonnar is offline   0
Old Jun 17, 2005, 06:45 PM   #3
Mac_Freak
macrumors 6502a
 
Mac_Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, New York
Send a message via AIM to Mac_Freak
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterBonnar
http://www.g-technology.com/products/g-raid.cfm

small portable and raid.

Is this the sort of thing you want?


maybe you mean for it to be battery powered?
I aslo am looking for external RAID set up to work as a storage device and PhotoShop Scratch Disk. I am actualy considering buying that G-Raid external drive ('s - its a 2 HD Raid)
__________________
15.4" Unibody MBP 2.53GHz, 320/7200
17" PB G4 1.33Ghz, Rev. B, ATI MR 9600 64MB, 1GB, BT, AP, 80GB HD, [ For Sale ]
Mac_Freak is offline   0
Old Jun 17, 2005, 07:23 PM   #4
jauh
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
... depending on how much you're willing to pay, you may want to have a look at http://www.wiebetech.com/products/rt5.php - US$1700 without drives though
jauh is offline   0
Old Jun 17, 2005, 07:54 PM   #5
Nuc
macrumors 6502a
 
Nuc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: TN
?

Why don't you just try and find a 3.5" enclosure that has a small form factor? By the time you get two hooked into a RAID 0 it will almost be the same size. Well almost the same size.......

Nuc
__________________
rMBP 2.6/16/512
&
2.33GHz 17" MBP C2D
Nuc is offline   0
Old Jun 17, 2005, 09:04 PM   #6
RedTomato
macrumors 68040
 
RedTomato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: .. London ..
Has anyone seen a battery powered 3.5'' enclosure?

I've seen a 2.5'' (google for 'battery powered hard drive enclosure') but 100GB max isnt really what i'm looking for.

I currently have a 300GB external in a firewire enclosure, and I'm thinking of adding a second one. If I add a second enclosure, and daisychain it to the first firewire enclosure, will I be able to RAID it? Is that a wise thing to do?

Otherwise I may have to resurrect my ancient PC and stuff it with drives, put a gigabit eithernet card in and use it as a fileserver, but i'd honestly rather not.

thanks

Tomato

Last edited by RedTomato; Jun 17, 2005 at 09:48 PM.
RedTomato is offline   0
Old Jun 17, 2005, 09:19 PM   #7
Mechcozmo
macrumors 601
 
Mechcozmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Send a message via AIM to Mechcozmo
Why not just a 1 TB LaCie external connected via FW800? Internally it is a RAID setup (drives connected via Firmware) and the FireWire 800 will be plenty fast.
__________________
This is not the signature you're looking for.
This is not the signature we're looking for.
You can scroll down now.
You can scroll down now.
Mechcozmo is offline   0
Old Jun 17, 2005, 10:08 PM   #8
Mac_Freak
macrumors 6502a
 
Mac_Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, New York
Send a message via AIM to Mac_Freak
[QUOTE=Mechcozmo]Why not just a 1 TB LaCie external connected via FW800? Internally it is a RAID setup (drives connected via Firmware) and the FireWire 800 will be plenty fast.[/QUOTE
When it comes to Lacie the Big Disk Extreme seems to be cheaper alternative and it is also a RAID set up with cool two drives that fit in one slim case. Plus has the same FireWire 800.
__________________
15.4" Unibody MBP 2.53GHz, 320/7200
17" PB G4 1.33Ghz, Rev. B, ATI MR 9600 64MB, 1GB, BT, AP, 80GB HD, [ For Sale ]
Mac_Freak is offline   0
Old Jun 17, 2005, 11:16 PM   #9
CanadaRAM
Contributor
 
CanadaRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: On the Left Coast - Victoria BC Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedTomato
Has anyone seen a battery powered 3.5'' enclosure?
I've seen a 2.5'' (google for 'battery powered hard drive enclosure') but 100GB max isnt really what i'm looking for.
I currently have a 300GB external in a firewire enclosure, and I'm thinking of adding a second one. If I add a second enclosure, and daisychain it to the first firewire enclosure, will I be able to RAID it? Is that a wise thing to do?
Otherwise I may have to resurrect my ancient PC and stuff it with drives, put a gigabit eithernet card in and use it as a fileserver, but i'd honestly rather not.
Confused. Do you want battery power, speed, portability or large size. These are mutually exclusive.

Battery: You won't see a battery powered 3.5" drive rig unless it is a lashup with a honking big battery. Laptop drives are much less hungry. Of course, they are also smaller and slower.

Go with a 3.5" drive for high capacity, not multiple 2.5's. Some of the LaCie drives do indeed use two 3.5" mechanisms in a hardware RAID 0 within their case.

Remember though that RAID 0 is a terrible thing to do in terms of data reliability. A problem with the drive or interface on any one of the drives and you lose all the data on both. You gotta be extra careful to back up.

If you REALLY want higher performance, you need to put the drives on separate busses. When you put a RAID on a Firewire controller (even if the machine has two FW jacks, they are on the same controller) it's like putting a Y connector on the end of a garden hose. You don't get more total volume through the hose. If you had two separate busses (two FW controllers) then that is like bringing in a second hose from another tap - you get a net near-doubling of bandwidth.

On a Powerbook 15" or 17", you can install a PCMCIA card Firewire 800 interface, and RAID that with the the onboard FW800 interface. With high speed 3.5" drives, that's as good as you are going to get on the Powerbook.
Barefeats.com has done some testing and reporting on this subject.

Thanks
Trevor
CanadaRAM.com
CanadaRAM is offline   0
Old Jun 18, 2005, 06:27 AM   #10
Onkelskrue
Thread Starter
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadaRAM
Confused. Do you want battery power, speed, portability or large size. These are mutually exclusive.

Battery: You won't see a battery powered 3.5" drive rig unless it is a lashup with a honking big battery. Laptop drives are much less hungry. Of course, they are also smaller and slower.

Go with a 3.5" drive for high capacity, not multiple 2.5's. Some of the LaCie drives do indeed use two 3.5" mechanisms in a hardware RAID 0 within their case.

Remember though that RAID 0 is a terrible thing to do in terms of data reliability. A problem with the drive or interface on any one of the drives and you lose all the data on both. You gotta be extra careful to back up.

If you REALLY want higher performance, you need to put the drives on separate busses. When you put a RAID on a Firewire controller (even if the machine has two FW jacks, they are on the same controller) it's like putting a Y connector on the end of a garden hose. You don't get more total volume through the hose. If you had two separate busses (two FW controllers) then that is like bringing in a second hose from another tap - you get a net near-doubling of bandwidth.

On a Powerbook 15" or 17", you can install a PCMCIA card Firewire 800 interface, and RAID that with the the onboard FW800 interface. With high speed 3.5" drives, that's as good as you are going to get on the Powerbook.
Barefeats.com has done some testing and reporting on this subject.

Thanks
Trevor
CanadaRAM.com

Thanks Trevor, you hit the nail on the head. Battery powered 2.5 drives might have been a solution, but I agree that using a firewire card that has enough juice to power the HD might be a better solution. Where I am going, there will be no electricity other than my rollable Brunton solar panel, thus I can not use anything that plugs into the wall.

Thanks all for your feedback!
Lars
Onkelskrue is offline   0

 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HELP! Wavy Screen and Strange Color Streaking on Powerbook 15 1.67 DL Hi Res Display jss273nyc PowerPC Macs 0 Jan 4, 2009 02:24 AM
Whats a reasonable price to sell a PB 17"/1.67 for? DaleMassey MacBook Pro 3 Aug 17, 2008 03:52 PM
Should PB 17 1.67 users wait to upgrade to Tiger? maclamb Mac OS X 6 May 3, 2005 06:20 PM
Ram for PB 15 DavidFalling Buying Tips, Advice and Discussion (archive) 9 Mar 23, 2005 08:25 AM
usb 2 card for pb 15 Gokhan Buying Tips, Advice and Discussion (archive) 1 Feb 22, 2004 08:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC