Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 7, 2012, 04:39 PM   #1
chfilm
macrumors 6502a
 
chfilm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Germany
21" fusion drive imac experiences yet?

hey,

I was wondering if anybody already received their BTO 21" imac with a fusion drive and can tell us how it feels
chfilm is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2012, 04:47 PM   #2
barca bear
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: UK
Yeah it's fast... Really fast!
barca bear is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2012, 05:01 PM   #3
wdowell
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
I'm very happy with mine - just wish I could specify which files went where to ensure that gb's of photos aren't hogging the ss bit. But so far seems ok.
wdowell is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2012, 05:50 PM   #4
bobright
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdowell View Post
I'm very happy with mine - just wish I could specify which files went where to ensure that gb's of photos aren't hogging the ss bit. But so far seems ok.
Huh, so there's no way to know what's where? That sucks.

If I were to use Logic to record and only occasionally used it does that mean it would most likely run on the HDD part since its only used rarely? I'd obviously prefer it to run/record on the SSD part
bobright is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 8, 2012, 01:47 AM   #5
henry72
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdowell View Post
I'm very happy with mine - just wish I could specify which files went where to ensure that gb's of photos aren't hogging the ss bit. But so far seems ok.
Yes I thinking the same. What I'm worry about is that OS X control where the files go, what if one drive failed. Then I will lost a part of my file? This is the only reason stopping me from upgrading. I haven't order mine yet, will see.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro Retina | Gold iPhone 5S | Apple TV 3
henry72 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 8, 2012, 01:52 AM   #6
flynz4
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Quote:
Originally Posted by henry72 View Post
Yes I thinking the same. What I'm worry about is that OS X control where the files go, what if one drive failed. Then I will lost a part of my file? This is the only reason stopping me from upgrading. I haven't order mine yet, will see.
I believe that if either drive fails... you lose your whole combined fusion drive. However... it doesn't matter. That is why you backup.

/Jim
flynz4 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 8, 2012, 02:11 AM   #7
atteligibility
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdowell View Post
I'm very happy with mine - just wish I could specify which files went where to ensure that gb's of photos aren't hogging the ss bit. But so far seems ok.
umm, for a lot of us the main benefit is precisely that we don't have to manually manage what goes on what drive. I know this kind of mental gymnastic would be unbearable to me, I am not good at putting stuff where they belong, and the fact that I don't get a performance penalty for not putting stuff where they belong is a huge plus.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by henry72 View Post
Yes I thinking the same. What I'm worry about is that OS X control where the files go, what if one drive failed. Then I will lost a part of my file? This is the only reason stopping me from upgrading. I haven't order mine yet, will see.
this is a strange way of seeing things? I am not sure I understand:
- If you only have one drive and it fails, don't you lose your stuff too?
- If you have two drives and one fail, don't you use what's on the failing drive?

If you have a solid backup plan (and you should), no matter if you use 1 drive, 2 drives, or a fusion drive, the restoring process will be the same:
- Replace the failing drive
- Restore your files from the backup
atteligibility is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 8, 2012, 04:05 PM   #8
henry72
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by atteligibility View Post
umm, for a lot of us the main benefit is precisely that we don't have to manually manage what goes on what drive. I know this kind of mental gymnastic would be unbearable to me, I am not good at putting stuff where they belong, and the fact that I don't get a performance penalty for not putting stuff where they belong is a huge plus.

----------



this is a strange way of seeing things? I am not sure I understand:
- If you only have one drive and it fails, don't you lose your stuff too?
- If you have two drives and one fail, don't you use what's on the failing drive?

If you have a solid backup plan (and you should), no matter if you use 1 drive, 2 drives, or a fusion drive, the restoring process will be the same:
- Replace the failing drive
- Restore your files from the backup
Thanks for your reply. True and I always back it up using Time Machine!

I guess another factor would be the price. I will have a think about it

Cheers!
__________________
15" MacBook Pro Retina | Gold iPhone 5S | Apple TV 3
henry72 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 8, 2012, 04:36 PM   #9
Apple fanboy
macrumors 601
 
Apple fanboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Quick and quiet would be how I would sum it up. It's been quick at downloading and installing software files (which is about all I've done so far). When I pull up a file its ultra quick, but as I haven't got much on there yet I guess it's all on the SSD!
__________________
Late 2012 21" iMac 2.9GHz i5, ITB FD, 16G RAM, 2 TB TC, iPhone 5 32GB, iPad Air 32G, iPad 4 32G, iPad 2 16G, ATV2, iPod touch 8G, Xbox 360 Nikon D7100/D300 70-200 24-70 14-24 60 10.5 mm (all 2.8)
Apple fanboy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 8, 2012, 05:38 PM   #10
MJD Dawg
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Near the Intersection of the Pacific, Juan de Fuca and N.A. Plates
As far as I know, everything goes onto the SSD until it's full.

Fusion then moves files back and forth to/from HDD based on how often they're accessed. It takes as little as two times accessing a file located on the HDD before it gets moved to the SSD.

If you've managed to fill the SSD, chances are that at least the software (photoshop,...etc) will reside on the SSD, while the pics that aren't accessed often would reside on the HDD...which is how you'd want it really.
MJD Dawg is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 8, 2012, 05:43 PM   #11
hfg
macrumors 68020
 
hfg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA.
Initially, it is all on the SSD, until you exceed the space.

After you have lived with the Fusion drive for awhile, it should "adjust" itself in keeping with your computing habits, and continue to do so forever.
hfg is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 8, 2012, 11:18 PM   #12
iVoid
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
If you really want to manually control where files are stored, repartition the two drives as separate volumes, install the OS on the SSD and use the disk drive for whatever data you like.
iVoid is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iMac 27" 2013 Fusion Drive Question Jonathanchasr iMac 1 Dec 11, 2013 06:47 PM
Late 2012 iMac 27" & CalDigit 4TB AV Pro External Drive: Experiences Skyjamma iMac 18 May 9, 2013 08:43 PM
Anyone have no problems on 27" iMac with Fusion Drive? MrPeelNZ iMac 10 Jan 26, 2013 05:06 PM
27" iMac - Speed of the 1TB HD in the Fusion drive CoreyLahey iMac 5 Dec 1, 2012 04:20 AM
Fusion Drive for 27" iMac NoShoreGuy iMac 1 Nov 4, 2012 03:00 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC