Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Site and Forum Feedback

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 4, 2012, 10:48 PM   #1
ap3604
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Man I LOVE the new look of the forums on macrumors!

.

Last edited by ap3604; Apr 9, 2012 at 04:52 PM.
ap3604 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2012, 10:50 PM   #2
Old Smuggler
macrumors 6502a
 
Old Smuggler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
i know, right?
Old Smuggler is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2012, 11:11 PM   #3
Jordan921
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bay Area
Not me. I liked how it was before
__________________
Unlocked Space Gray iPhone 5S 32gb AT&T, 13.3" MacBook Air 1.86GHZ 4GB Ram 128GB SSD
Jordan921 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2012, 11:15 PM   #4
ap3604
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
.

Last edited by ap3604; Apr 9, 2012 at 04:50 PM.
ap3604 is offline   -1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 12:39 AM   #5
Jordan921
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bay Area
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap3604 View Post
Your probably just a creature of habit and need to get used to it.

I don't use my iPhone to go on the full site version of the nytimes give me a good mobile version! that way I dont have to use up all my data and it loads faster.

Besides... If you don't like it simply go to the bottom and hit "full site"
Yup creature of habit I am.
__________________
Unlocked Space Gray iPhone 5S 32gb AT&T, 13.3" MacBook Air 1.86GHZ 4GB Ram 128GB SSD
Jordan921 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 12:41 AM   #6
JoeG4
macrumors 68020
 
JoeG4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bay Area, Ca.
Send a message via ICQ to JoeG4 Send a message via AIM to JoeG4
lol I like it just fine, but I will say this:

I thought the big deal about smartphones was seeing the whole internet. What's the point of turning a $500 piece of high tech into something no better than a Motorola Razr browsing WAP sites.
__________________
I've been a huge fan of Mac OS X since 2001!
JoeG4 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 12:55 AM   #7
chrisbetty
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap3604 View Post
That was always a big issue for me with macrumors before now... the mobile version of the forums sucked! You were basically forced to use the full site which loads slower, used up more data, and you always had to zoom in to see anything

Not anymore though. This mobile format of the forums now is damn beautiful and I am loving the new layout
I never really liked the mobile site,just added MacRumors on Tapatalk,Never been happier
__________________
Mid 2010 21.5" iMac,Verizon gold iPhone 5s 16gb
chrisbetty is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 07:02 AM   #8
matttye
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lincoln, England
I preferred the old way. I have a phone with a 4.3" screen and an excellent wifi router at home, I don't need watered down versions of websites.
__________________
iPad 2 16GB Black (WiFi+3G) -- iPhone 5s 64GB Space Grey.
matttye is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 07:05 AM   #9
ap3604
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
.

Last edited by ap3604; Apr 9, 2012 at 04:49 PM.
ap3604 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 07:17 AM   #10
ericrwalker
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Albany, NY
You're probably just missing the vote buttons. At least now the forum actually fits in the screen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by matttye View Post
I preferred the old way. I have a phone with a 4.3" screen and an excellent wifi router at home, I don't need watered down versions of websites.
ericrwalker is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 07:18 AM   #11
Mobile923
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeG4 View Post
lol I like it just fine, but I will say this:

I thought the big deal about smartphones was seeing the whole internet. What's the point of turning a $500 piece of high tech into something no better than a Motorola Razr browsing WAP sites.
This is exactly what I was thinking when I started seeing "iPhone optimized" sites...
__________________
One man band, one man show. www.richy923.com
Mobile923 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 07:21 AM   #12
ericrwalker
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Albany, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeG4 View Post
lol I like it just fine, but I will say this:

I thought the big deal about smartphones was seeing the whole internet. What's the point of turning a $500 piece of high tech into something no better than a Motorola Razr browsing WAP sites.
They can develop the site to be full featured, but fit the screen of your device. You can have the whole internet, but modify it to fix on a more narrow screen.
ericrwalker is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 07:24 AM   #13
matttye
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lincoln, England
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap3604 View Post
^^ Not sure what your complaining about simply scroll to the bottom of the page and press "full site" if you want it the old way.
I never use that end of the site... Thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericrwalker View Post
You're probably just missing the vote buttons. At least now the forum actually fits in the screen.
Yeah that's one thing. I don't like the look either though.
__________________
iPad 2 16GB Black (WiFi+3G) -- iPhone 5s 64GB Space Grey.
matttye is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 11:21 AM   #14
gapperonduty
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
is it me or is there no way to go straight to 'last' page ?
gapperonduty is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 12:33 PM   #15
Menge
macrumors 6502a
 
Menge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brazil
New look is awesome!

You can go to the last page by tapping the ">|" shortcut.
__________________
Menge - 2011 2.3GHz 13" MBP - 16GB iPhone 5 - 32GB iPad WiFi+4G - 8GB iPod Nano - AEBS
Menge is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 12:35 PM   #16
BadboyHouse
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
i love it
BadboyHouse is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 12:38 PM   #17
gapperonduty
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Menge View Post
New look is awesome!

You can go to the last page by tapping the ">|" shortcut.
thank you sir

i noob
gapperonduty is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 12:38 PM   #18
cyks
macrumors 68020
 
cyks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Westchester County, NY
What does this have to do with the iPhone?

There's a place for threads like this:
http://forums.macrumors.com/forumdisplay.php?f=66
cyks is offline   -3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 12:49 PM   #19
scaredpoet
macrumors 603
 
scaredpoet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeG4 View Post
I thought the big deal about smartphones was seeing the whole internet. What's the point of turning a $500 piece of high tech into something no better than a Motorola Razr browsing WAP sites.
First off, the mobile websites of today are a huge step above WAP. This:

is NOT indicative of how we view mobile websites today. For most phones, there was no touch interface. Graphics were barely there, if at all. And even the text looked pretty bad.

If you were really lucky, you could get something a little nicer on your PDA:



But that often required a proxy service that you had to pay extra for, and the info was synced periodically, not in real-time. Unless you were really enterprising and new how to modify a sync cable to hook up to your non-smart cellphone, and use CSD to pull in new content at a rip-roaring 9.6kbps. Or, you had a lot of money and could get yourself one of those early smartphones, that got about the same 9.6kbps data speed.

(Yes, I admit, I used to do this back in the day.)

And with WAP, there was no choice. Either a site had a mobile-optimized, WAP-Compliant website, or it simply couldn't be seen on your phone, at all. with current handsets, the option is there for a content provider to make a mobile site, but their lack of desire or inability to make one doesn't mean you're out of luck.

The point remains usability. Done right, a mobile-optimized layout lets you quickly digest data in a touch-friendly interface in a design optimized for a small screen. It's often better than having to zoom in and out to look at certain parts of a web page to get the into you want, or scrolling all over the place. the physics of fingers on a small screen remains an issue that the current technology has to contend with.

There are also things that multitouch mobile interfaces do really well, like tapping through menus to get routine tasks done quickly, or the way you can swipe to "flip" through pages on a tablet, which isn't' as easy or natural to do on a mouse/keyboard/screen interface. Might as well take advantage of that.

Don't get me wrong: I really don't like when sites FORCE you to use a mobile interface, and don't give you the option of seeing the full version if you want it. Usually the same sites that do this are also the ones that did a lousy job of implementing the mobile interface, making the mobile site nearly useless anyway.
__________________
If you're not a clairvoyant, then you shouldn't be speaking for a dead guy.
I'm here to talk about Apple stuff, and related tech stuff. Your political beliefs? I really couldn't care less about.

Last edited by scaredpoet; Apr 5, 2012 at 12:56 PM.
scaredpoet is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 12:56 PM   #20
Looon
macrumors 6502a
 
Looon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by scaredpoet View Post
First off, the mobile websites of today are a huge step above WAP. This:
Image
is NOT indicative of how we view mobile websites today. For most phones, there was no touch interface. Graphics were barely there, if at all. And even the text looked pretty bad.

If you were really lucky, you could get something a little nicer on your PDA:

Image

But that often required a proxy service that you had to pay extra for, and the info was synced periodically, not in real-time. Unless you were really enterprising and new how to modify a sync cable to hook up to your non-smart cellphone, and use CSD to pull in new content at a rip-roaring 9.6kbps. Or, you had a lot of money and could get yourself one of those early smartphones, that got about the same 9.6kbps data speed.

(Yes, I admit, I used to do this back in the day.)

And with WAP, there was no choice. Either a site had a mobile-optimized, WAP-Compliant website, or it simply couldn't be seen on your phone, at all. with current handsets, the option is there for a content provider to make a mobile site, but their lack of desire or inability to make one doesn't mean you're out of luck.

The point remains usability. Done right, a mobile-optimized layout lets you quickly digest data in a touch-friendly interface in a design optimized for a small screen. It's often better than having to zoom in and out to look at certain parts of a web page to get the into you want, or scrolling all over the place. the physics of fingers on a small screen remains an issue that the current technology has to contend with.

There are also things that multitouch mobile interfaces do really well, like tapping through menus to get routine tasks done quickly, or the way you can swipe to "flip" through pages on a tablet, which isn't' as easy or natural to do on a mouse/keyboard/screen interface. Might as well take advantage of that.

Don't get me wrong: I really don't like when sites FORCE you to use a mobile interface, and don't give you the option of seeing the full version if you want it. Usually the same sites that do this are also the ones that did a lousy job of implementing the mobile interface, making the mobile site nearly useless anyway.
Oh man I remember this
Can't believe how far we've come since that lol. I remember one of my friends used to have a PDA and I would bug him every class to use it to browse the "internet"
__________________
iPhone 5S 64GB Verizon
Looon is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 01:01 PM   #21
Interstella5555
macrumors 603
 
Interstella5555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap3604 View Post
Your probably just a creature of habit and need to get used to it.

I don't use my iPhone to go on the full site version of the nytimes give me a good mobile version! that way I dont have to use up all my data and it loads faster.

Besides... If you don't like it simply go to the bottom and hit "full site"
That pretty much doesn't exist...anywhere
Interstella5555 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 01:19 PM   #22
Applejuiced
macrumors Nehalem
 
Applejuiced's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: At the iPhone hacks section.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan921 View Post
Not me. I liked how it was before
Me too, is there any way we can use the old full version on the iphone still?
Edit.
I just found it by scrolling on the bottom.
Thanks.
Applejuiced is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 01:50 PM   #23
pooleman
macrumors 65816
 
pooleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Eastern CT
Its a lot better now.
pooleman is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 03:33 PM   #24
HazyCloud
macrumors 68030
 
HazyCloud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Wow, I had no idea it finally got a mobile version. Thanks for the heads up!
__________________
If you have a question about my post, quote me so I am notified and can easily reply to you.
HazyCloud is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2012, 04:01 PM   #25
cwwilson
macrumors 6502a
 
cwwilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
It's fast. Looks good on the iPhone as well but it's too bad you can't the +/- on the posts or the views/posts on a thread when in the forum.
cwwilson is offline   -1 Reply With Quote


Reply
MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Site and Forum Feedback

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Macrumors forums rss? Jacksonc iPad Apps 1 Dec 16, 2013 12:21 AM
I love these forums! TSE Site and Forum Feedback 12 Jun 7, 2013 11:27 PM
What is the difference between MacRumors Forums (2011) and MacRumours Forums (2012)? snowleopard48 Site and Forum Feedback 4 Sep 12, 2012 07:18 AM
MacRumors forums levels utahman130 Site and Forum Feedback 1 Jun 26, 2012 09:20 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC