Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Design and Graphics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 12, 2012, 03:12 PM   #1
Moonjumper
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincoln, UK
Microsoft have a go at Apple, and may have a point

I read an article about Microsoft Metro because a site linked to it saying a Microsoft designer insults Apple’s Ugly, Skeuomorphic Apps. I was expecting to have a bit of a laugh at it, but they make a good point.

http://mashable.com/2012/03/29/micro...Fast-and-Fluid

Skeuomorphic is referring to digital graphics faking real life objects.

All those glassy shines that Apple puts on apps, but which most other apps now prefer to avoid (quite rightly I think) are not too bad, but I would prefer them without.

What really gets me is the baize, wood, leather and other materials that have appeared in Apple apps over the last couple of years. Game Center being particularly hideous.

I quite like the look of Metro on Windows phones, and it seems to work OK, but is a functional disaster on the desktop from what I have heard, far worse than what the iOS elements have done to OS X (I don't mind the iOS bits being there, I do mind them not being optional).

Do you think Apple could learn something from Metro's digital honesty?
Moonjumper is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2012, 03:44 PM   #2
LorenK
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Sorry, but I don't agree, the new Metro looks like something designed for people with a vision impairment. While there is a certain simplicity to it, the design is just a few steps removed from street signs, no elegance or art to it. I am trying to think what else the style reminds me of, maybe the color and style of a child's game, like the oversized buttons on a toy phone or a Speak and Spell. While there is something to be said for that simplicity, is that a style reflects a sophisticated, technical company? Microsoft should go back to the drawing board, and not an etch-a-sketch.
LorenK is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2012, 12:33 AM   #3
lucidmedia
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Not going to make this into a windows vs. mac thing as I have not taken a good look at Metro. I fully agree that the skeumorphism that is creeping into apple software is a serious step backwards.
lucidmedia is offline   12 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2012, 05:02 AM   #4
Jim Campbell
macrumors 6502a
 
Jim Campbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: A World of my Own; UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucidmedia View Post
I fully agree that the skeumorphism that is creeping into apple software is a serious step backwards.
Yep. Address Book is an abomination, the faux leather of iCal is ugly, but the one-page-per-month paradigm inflicts a limitation of a desktop calendar onto an application that should be able to offer more flexibility… I find it hard to believe that either of those would have got anywhere near a final release in the OS under Jobs in full health…

Cheers

Jim
__________________
Eagle Award Nominated Comic Book Letterer: Blog | Samples
Not-So-Professional-Artist: Scribbles
Jim Campbell is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2012, 07:24 PM   #5
jrichie
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Aus
One of the reasons I dumped my iPhone and went for a Nokia lumia was these awful fake timber / paper graphics in ios.

As others have said, iCal and address book are pretty bad in osx due to their graphical nature, and I really hope it is culled.

Even though I love my macs, I really love win phone 7 interface and it's use way over iOS and am starting to wonder whether I will eventually end up in windows land again given the cheesy taste of recent apple changes to the interfaces.
jrichie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2012, 11:21 AM   #6
Moonjumper
Thread Starter
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincoln, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrichie View Post
One of the reasons I dumped my iPhone and went for a Nokia lumia was these awful fake timber / paper graphics in ios.

As others have said, iCal and address book are pretty bad in osx due to their graphical nature, and I really hope it is culled.

Even though I love my macs, I really love win phone 7 interface and it's use way over iOS and am starting to wonder whether I will eventually end up in windows land again given the cheesy taste of recent apple changes to the interfaces.
I certainly wouldn't dump my iPhone for a Nokia Lumia. I think it is because there is so much I like about iOS, that when something is wrong it is very jarring. I just wish the software had the honesty, clean lines and beauty of the hardware.
Moonjumper is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2012, 08:50 PM   #7
chrono1081
macrumors 604
 
chrono1081's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Isla Nublar
Although I agree about things like Photobooth and iCal that are made to look like real life counterparts, I don't think Microsoft has a better looking system than Mac.

Personally the tiles just look like a jumbled mess to me. The colors mean nothing (at least nothing I can tell, they just appear to be randomly assigned) and the lack of contrast means I have to look at each tile to figure out what it does, that and sometimes they flip which I don't like.

It makes for a confusing mess in my opinion.

That being said I don't mind it on phones, we have winphones at work and I prefer them over our android phones.
__________________
Mac Pro (2010): 3.33Ghz Intel Xeon (6 core) - 24 GB RAM - NVidia Quadro k5000
Macbook Air (2010): 2.13 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo - 4GB RAM
chrono1081 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2012, 10:30 PM   #8
JoeG4
macrumors 68020
 
JoeG4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bay Area, Ca.
Send a message via ICQ to JoeG4 Send a message via AIM to JoeG4
Microsoft doesn't have a leg to stand on, with this remark. xD

Honestly, if you're going to complain about iCal having leather trim or whatever (and I agree, it's stupid), you'll hate metro. Metro takes 20+ years of GUI refinement and throws it all out the window for a crappy looking iPad-esque UI with all of the same limitations and almost no benefits.

All I have to say about it is this - I was using a circuit design program a few weeks ago and wanted to see how well it worked in Windows 8. In fact, it worked fine (in Aero), but when I double clicked a PDF to check specs in a data sheet, it hogged up the whole screen. Lovely!

It's like you're forced to do everything - including checking the weather in full screen. What, was the designer suffering from massive ADHD? I understand it on a 10" tablet with cooling and battery use restrictions, but on a computer? Seriously? Come on!

As a matter of fact, I don't even understand it on tablets - we're about to hit a point where iOS and the others are starting to allow you to do multiple things at the same time as the hardware gets more powerful to handle it. Personally I think a lot of programmers are a little bit too lazy to keep up, but whatever.

If MS was going for a massive disruption they should've ditched NT for a unix core and spent the massive waste of marketing dept design $$ on engineering time to transition everything else over smoothly. Aero, with a little bit of refinement would have been just fine and I think it would be a boom for MS in the science market, too.
__________________
I've been a huge fan of Mac OS X since 2001!
JoeG4 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2012, 10:51 PM   #9
thejadedmonkey
macrumors 604
 
thejadedmonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pa
Send a message via AIM to thejadedmonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeG4 View Post
Metro takes 20+ years of GUI refinement and throws it all out the window for a crappy looking iPad-esque UI with all of the same limitations and almost no benefits.
uh, what? I think the point of the article was actually that Metro takes 20+ years of GUI refinement and starts over, creating something that's nothing like an iPad-eqsue UI with tons of benefits.

Having used Metro UI extensively on Windows Phone, I can say it's superb. Windows 8 needs some work, but WP7 is fantastic, and I don't miss faux-leather or, as others have said, the abomination that is Game Center.

It's a completely different way of looking at a computer. Instead of pretending that it's a non-electronic device like Apple wants to do, Microsoft is embracing its electronic element 100%, and creating an entirely new way of looking at it.

Do I agree with it? I think I do. Could Apple learn from it though? Not at all, not without removing Aqua completely.
__________________
MacBook • 17" MacBook Pro • iPod Nano • Apple TV
PS4 • Custom Windows 8.1 Desktop • WP8.1
"Good judgment comes from experience,
experience comes from bad judgment."
- Mulla Nasrudin
thejadedmonkey is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2012, 06:38 AM   #10
Moonjumper
Thread Starter
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincoln, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonjumper View Post
I quite like the look of Metro on Windows phones, and it seems to work OK, but is a functional disaster on the desktop from what I have heard, far worse than what the iOS elements have done to OS X (I don't mind the iOS bits being there, I do mind them not being optional).

Do you think Apple could learn something from Metro's digital honesty?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeG4 View Post
Microsoft doesn't have a leg to stand on, with this remark. xD

Honestly, if you're going to complain about iCal having leather trim or whatever (and I agree, it's stupid), you'll hate metro. Metro takes 20+ years of GUI refinement and throws it all out the window for a crappy looking iPad-esque UI with all of the same limitations and almost no benefits.

All I have to say about it is this - I was using a circuit design program a few weeks ago and wanted to see how well it worked in Windows 8. In fact, it worked fine (in Aero), but when I double clicked a PDF to check specs in a data sheet, it hogged up the whole screen. Lovely!

It's like you're forced to do everything - including checking the weather in full screen. What, was the designer suffering from massive ADHD? I understand it on a 10" tablet with cooling and battery use restrictions, but on a computer? Seriously? Come on!

As a matter of fact, I don't even understand it on tablets - we're about to hit a point where iOS and the others are starting to allow you to do multiple things at the same time as the hardware gets more powerful to handle it. Personally I think a lot of programmers are a little bit too lazy to keep up, but whatever.

If MS was going for a massive disruption they should've ditched NT for a unix core and spent the massive waste of marketing dept design $$ on engineering time to transition everything else over smoothly. Aero, with a little bit of refinement would have been just fine and I think it would be a boom for MS in the science market, too.
I have quoted the last bit of my original post to show that we are largely in agreement. The Microsoft quote was about graphic design, not the underlying software. I wouldn't want Apple to work more like Metro, just abandon the move to faux materials.

All the Apple apps in iOS used to use their standard UI. I don't know why they abandoned that. At most tint the colours to signify the app.
Moonjumper is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2012, 09:13 AM   #11
elppa
macrumors 68040
 
elppa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrono1081 View Post
That being said I don't mind it on phones, we have winphones at work and I prefer them over our android phones.
The execution is a good deal better on the phone. In addition the physical screen is smaller, so the design decisions make sense.

Whereas on a full sized PC monitor, it makes no sense to hide toolbars by default and then require a right click to show them. There's more than enough space for toolbars and content.
elppa is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2012, 09:52 AM   #12
Moonjumper
Thread Starter
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincoln, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by elppa View Post
The execution is a good deal better on the phone. In addition the physical screen is smaller, so the design decisions make sense.

Whereas on a full sized PC monitor, it makes no sense to hide toolbars by default and then require a right click to show them. There's more than enough space for toolbars and content.
Vey true. Computers have different usage patterns, screen sizes and input options. I don't like a lot of the iOS features that have been added to OS X, but it is not nearly as bad as Metro on a PC looks to be.
Moonjumper is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 25, 2012, 08:12 AM   #13
Santabean2000
macrumors 65816
 
Santabean2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
I also vote fugly on the faux materials look. Doesn't look good on/in cars and translates poorly into the GUI too.

Gamecentre is the worst culprit. Hideous IMHO. But then I don't use GC so doesn't do my head in too much.

Maybe they could go down this design route when haptic tech is suitably convincing, which I guess is no time soon.
Santabean2000 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 25, 2012, 10:31 AM   #14
zzLZHzz
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
as a user of both OS X Lion, Windows 8 Consumer preview and Windows Phone.

i would say that my windows 8 bootup and shutdown a lot faster than Snow Leopard and Lion.

i actually like the windows phone UI though i hasn't own a iPhone yet.

the metro UI for windows 8 work better on a touch screen even though it work fine on traditional desktop
zzLZHzz is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 25, 2012, 01:10 PM   #15
Apple Key
macrumors 6502a
 
Apple Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Simplicity is great, but not to the point where it affects usability.

By mentioning gold as a material, they are making a complete joke out of this.
__________________
You know what they say... once you go Mac you ain't never gonna go back.
Apple Key is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2012, 03:45 AM   #16
kevinfulton.ca
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
I don't mind SOME simulated elements, but I also agree that it's been getting a little out of hand lately on iOS and creeping more into OSX. That being said I find it funny that they criticize the shiny UI elements yet with Vista it was quite clear that they were attempting to emulate much of the Aqua UI look. Still, whether you like the Metro look or not at least they're finally trying something different for a change. It's refreshing to look at........for now. I can see myself getting bored with it over time though. Simple is good, but I think they maybe went a little too simple?
__________________
13" White Macbook, 4 GB RAM, 500GB HD, 22" external monitor, 320 GB Firewire scratch disc, 2 TB partitioned expansion/backup HD; iPad 2, 64 GB, 3G; iPhone 4S, 16 GB.
kevinfulton.ca is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2012, 05:15 AM   #17
bpaluzzi
macrumors 6502a
 
bpaluzzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Campbell View Post
Yep. Address Book is an abomination, the faux leather of iCal is ugly, but the one-page-per-month paradigm inflicts a limitation of a desktop calendar onto an application that should be able to offer more flexibility… I find it hard to believe that either of those would have got anywhere near a final release in the OS under Jobs in full health…

Cheers

Jim
By all accounts, Jobs was leading the push for the skeuomorphic designs.
__________________
Mac Pro; Aluminum iMac; Mac Mini (x2); Macbook Pro; iPad; iPhone 4; TV 2 (x2); G4 Tower
bpaluzzi is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2012, 11:15 AM   #18
LorenK
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Metro is just poor design, looking like it was designed for kindergartners by kindergartners and dissing iOS to claim some kind of advantage misses the mark, Metro either stands on it own as a design or it doesn't and the faults of iOS are irrelevant (though I will agree some of the design choices are lame, but at least it provides some clear distinction between app buttons).

Making the design simplistic for the sake of simplicity is silly, the purpose has to be to guide people in use of the software. iOS through allowing app developers to create unique buttons allows for some memorable (and not so memeorable) touch points. What does Metro do? Make it look like a dayglo fruit bowl. When you think about it, what has Metro done but resurrect the color scheme of the old iMacs. Interesting design choice. While it was good at the time, it doesn't work anymore and Metro doesn't work now as a graphic design. I'd add IMHO, but if you like the Metro graphic design, then I think that you have vision problems and should see an optometrist to have your eyes checked immediately.

Last edited by LorenK; Apr 26, 2012 at 11:17 AM. Reason: typo
LorenK is offline   -2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2012, 03:29 PM   #19
ILikeTurtles
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
About 90% of respondents to this thread have no idea what they're talking about.

ILikeTurtles is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2012, 06:28 PM   #20
Consultant
macrumors G5
 
Consultant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by LorenK View Post
Sorry, but I don't agree, the new Metro looks like something designed for people with a vision impairment. While there is a certain simplicity to it, the design is just a few steps removed from street signs, no elegance or art to it. I am trying to think what else the style reminds me of, maybe the color and style of a child's game, like the oversized buttons on a toy phone or a Speak and Spell. While there is something to be said for that simplicity, is that a style reflects a sophisticated, technical company? Microsoft should go back to the drawing board, and not an etch-a-sketch.
Exactly. That's why Windows Phone still hasn't caught on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonjumper View Post
I quite like the look of Metro on Windows phones, and it seems to work OK, but is a functional disaster on the desktop from what I have heard, far worse than what the iOS elements have done to OS X (I don't mind the iOS bits being there, I do mind them not being optional).
Windows user tries out Windows 8 Metro and OS X.
http://obamapacman.com/2012/03/windo...c-os-x-videos/
Consultant is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2012, 10:45 AM   #21
beg_ne
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Skeuomorphic UI's, despite how much the computing elite hate them, are probably massively popular with the typical user(and there are 90% of them compared to 10% of us) and probably makes them much more comfortable using the apps. Obviously Apple has some data to back this up or they wouldn't continue to expand it.

I'd almost go as far as to say the skeuomorphic UI is a big advantage for Apple as the programmer art-esque UI's on Android and especially WP7 only resonates with hardcore geeks.

It's not only Apple apps that adopt this style either, a lot of really popular 3rd party apps also make pretty heavy use of skeuomorphic design. Paper would be a good recent example of this.

Microsoft can talk as much trash as they want, but the vast majority of people could seem to give a **** about using their mobile OS.

I really don't get peoples love affair with the tiles in the first place. This is basically all the "design" is:

.tile {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: blue; // or other random primary color
font-size: 40px;
color: white;
}

meh.
beg_ne is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 29, 2012, 04:02 AM   #22
Jim Campbell
macrumors 6502a
 
Jim Campbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: A World of my Own; UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by bpaluzzi View Post
By all accounts, Jobs was leading the push for the skeuomorphic designs.
Wow. I'm genuinely surprised.

TBH, though, the eye-watering ugliness of iCal bothers me less than the insistence on the one-calendar-month-per-page limitation, which impacts usability in the name of 'realism'.

Cheers

Jim
Jim Campbell is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 2012, 08:49 AM   #23
iGav
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
I can certainly see Microsofts point, and I think it's good that they're having a conversation about it. It is certainly more preferable (from a creative point of view), to simply copying Apple.

Of course, the reality of the situation that Microsoft find themselves in, is that they really have no other option than to try something different to differentiate themselves. And I applaud them for attempting to do so.

At the time of the release of OS X, their was much discussion within the design community at the time, that OS X lacked the (visual) sophistication of the hardware, that the interface was needlessly gimmicky, populist and overly animated, I seem to recall that there was suggestions that it was almost disneyfied in its execution, the complete opposite of the increasingly minimal hardware.

Certainly, like OS X, iOS is visually of questionable taste and sophistication in many area's, but it's like what beg_ne has said above, forgoing a more austere interface for a more humanist one, arguably makes the device more familiar, therefore more accessible, more useable and therefore less intimidating.
__________________
Me.
iGav is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 2, 2012, 11:22 AM   #24
Consultant
macrumors G5
 
Consultant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
1996 AOL vs 2012 W8
http://work.failblog.org/2012/04/13/...in-the-making/
Consultant is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old May 2, 2012, 07:00 PM   #25
chown33
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILikeTurtles View Post
About 90% of respondents to this thread have no idea what they're talking about.

Not unusual.
chown33 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Design and Graphics

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Would there be any point in getting an Apple TV? chrisrosemusic1 Apple TV and Home Theater 5 Jul 18, 2013 03:56 PM
Is there any point in having Apple TV 2 & 3 guitarmandp Apple TV and Home Theater 2 Feb 17, 2013 04:51 PM
Has Apple beat itself by this point Myiphone7 Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 10 Dec 21, 2012 01:16 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC