Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:22 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
New App Turns Bluetooth On and Off With One Touch






A frequent complaint amongst some iPhone power users is the number of steps it takes to toggle Bluetooth on and off. It takes the user four steps -- Settings/General/Bluetooth/Toggle -- to turn it on or off. However, a just-launched app aims to make the task much simpler.

Bluetooth OnOff launched last night and enables the toggling of Bluetooth with just a tap -- or even, via a blank toggle, simply by launching the app. To do this, head to the app's settings panel in Settings and toggle the unlabeled switch there, kill the app through the multitasking tray and relaunch it.

It's a universal app, for iPhone and iPad -- however, this sort of direct control of Bluetooth is prohibited by Apple's iOS app guidelines and it's unclear how long Apple will allow the app to remain on the App Store.

Bluetooth OnOff is $0.99 on the App Store. [Direct Link]

Article Link: New App Turns Bluetooth On and Off With One Touch
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:26 PM   #2
guspasho
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
I would love this for Wi-Fi! I can't count the number of times I've gotten stuck on a Wi-Fi network that isn't working right, either the signal is too low, or it's bogged down with users, or has no Internet access.
guspasho is offline   18 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:28 PM   #3
troop231
macrumors 601
 
troop231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Wow, how did this even get approved?

If Apple pulls the app, will they still pay the developer?
troop231 is offline   12 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:29 PM   #4
iDisk
macrumors 6502a
 
iDisk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Menlo Park, CA
You can please some of the people ....some of the time.
__________________
"Where there is no vision the people perish:"- Proverbs 29:18
iDisk is offline   -3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:31 PM   #5
Exhale
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by troop231 View Post
Wow, how did this even get approved?
Its not exactly a secret many apps make it through without proper validation.

Remember the Pokemon Yellow incident a while back?
Exhale is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:32 PM   #6
RoboCop001
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by iDisk View Post
You can please some of the people ....some of the time.
Or none of them all of the time

Technically you're affecting more people by pleasing no one........
RoboCop001 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:33 PM   #7
WiiDSmoker
macrumors 65816
 
WiiDSmoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hermitage, TN
Or just JB and use SBSettings.

This really shows how dumb it is to toggle certain things in iOS.
WiiDSmoker is offline   -10 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:33 PM   #8
Zimmy68
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Fool me once.

This might not get pulled, just circumvented in an OS update.

I paid for Flashlaunch that direct linked straight to the wifi/bluetooth settings.
Worked just like I wanted.
Until the last iOS update.

No updates and it doesn't work anymore.

So, as much as I want this app, I am not paying a cent for it unless they guarantee future support, which I doubt would happen.
Zimmy68 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:33 PM   #9
UnseenLlama
macrumors 6502a
 
UnseenLlama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
This guy is gonna make a fortune!
UnseenLlama is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:33 PM   #10
troop231
macrumors 601
 
troop231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exhale View Post
Its not exactly a secret many apps make it through without proper validation.

Remember the Pokemon Yellow incident a while back?
Is it still fair that the dev who made this Bluetooth app gets paid for directly violating the guidelines? Just wondering, as it's not fair to the other developers who could make these kind of apps, but not get approved.
troop231 is offline   -3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:33 PM   #11
djdino
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
it's called jailbreaking.
djdino is offline   -5 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:35 PM   #12
troop231
macrumors 601
 
troop231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnseenLlama View Post
This guy is gonna make a fortune!
How do you think that? He's in violation.
troop231 is offline   -4 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:40 PM   #13
Zimmy68
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by troop231 View Post
Is it still fair that the dev who made this Bluetooth app gets paid for directly violating the guidelines? Just wondering, as it's not fair to the other developers who could make these kind of apps, but not get approved.
There should be a clause that if an app gets pulled for violation after, everyone that bought it gets a refund, whether that is full or less Apple's 30%, I don't care.

I bought Comic Book Mobi when the first iPad came out for like $15.
The dev circumvented Apple rules by allowing USB loading (which oddly, is allowed today).
Apple took his app down.
I had to fight and scream to get my money back.
To me, part of the purchase price is future support.
Zimmy68 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:41 PM   #14
Hellhammer
Moderator
 
Hellhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Send a message via MSN to Hellhammer
Now a similar app for WiFi, please.
__________________
SSD Editor for AnandTech
You can also follow me in Twitter!
Hellhammer is offline   12 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:43 PM   #15
rorschach
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Download it now, even if you don't think you'll use it. It'll be gone by the end of the day, imo.

I bought the HandyLight app for tethering even though I had no use for tethering at the time, but it ended up being very useful a few times.
__________________
MacBook Air 13-inch (Mid 2012), iPhone 6
rorschach is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:46 PM   #16
Brandino147
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellhammer View Post
Now a similar app for WiFi, please.
Agreed
Brandino147 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:48 PM   #17
n64kps
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
Talking

I've been able to do this on my Android device for years...and it's legit.
__________________
iOS vs. Android - Competition drives innovation
n64kps is offline   -11 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:48 PM   #18
UnseenLlama
macrumors 6502a
 
UnseenLlama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Quote:
Originally Posted by troop231 View Post
How do you think that? He's in violation.
If the app would be allowed to stay in the App store, he/she probably will make some money.

It fills an important functional need, at least for me.
UnseenLlama is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:50 PM   #19
Bodycalming
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK, Wickford.
This Bluetooth On/Off feature should be built into SIRI, not as a paid App. Shame on you Apple for allowing it to be sold.
__________________
iMac 27" i7 8Gb.
MacBook.
Time Capsule.
iPhone 6 Gold 128Gb.
Bodycalming is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:51 PM   #20
diazj3
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnseenLlama View Post
It fills an important functional need
I agree. Too bad it will probably be pulled by Apple.

I also wish there was a direct access app to the music EQ... same story.
diazj3 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:51 PM   #21
ThunderSkunk
macrumors 68000
 
ThunderSkunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Durango, Co
What I don't get is how it takes Apple months and months to evaluate and approve one app, and then something like this gets through as if no one ever laid eyes on it.

Very weird.
ThunderSkunk is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:52 PM   #22
rorschach
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimmy68 View Post
There should be a clause that if an app gets pulled for violation after, everyone that bought it gets a refund, whether that is full or less Apple's 30%, I don't care.

I bought Comic Book Mobi when the first iPad came out for like $15.
The dev circumvented Apple rules by allowing USB loading (which oddly, is allowed today).
Apple took his app down.
I had to fight and scream to get my money back.
To me, part of the purchase price is future support.
Similar story, sort of. I bought the MLB At-Bat 2010 app at the beginning of that season. And it worked fine all year, even after the season ended. However, a few months into 2011 it just stopped working completely. It would just show an error when I opened it. The app hadn't been updated; one day it just stopped working.

Well, I had actually found it useful for looking up games from the season (you can only access the games for the season the app was released for) and videos from those games. I checked and double-checked everywhere to see if there was some fine print about the app "expiring", but I found nothing. I emailed Apple and told them the app I had purchased was broken and non-functional and requested a refund. I got the run-around with Apple telling me to contact MLB and MLB telling me to contact Apple.

It wasn't a huge deal, but I was curious to know if developers were actually allowed to intentionally cripple/break their apps that people had paid for. It was kind of shady.
__________________
MacBook Air 13-inch (Mid 2012), iPhone 6
rorschach is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:53 PM   #23
troop231
macrumors 601
 
troop231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnseenLlama View Post
If the app would be allowed to stay in the App store, he/she probably will make some money.

It fills an important functional need, at least for me.
The problem is that it won't be allowed to stay, as it uses system level private APIs to accomplish the function, which is a major no-no. If Apple did let it stay, it would be a punch in the face to developers who actually follow the guidelines.
troop231 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:56 PM   #24
Tsuius
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: GTA
This is much to do about nothing!
The reason the bluetooth setting is buried is because it is supposed to stay ON so it is available when YOU need it.

I want a bluetooth connection when I get in my car or when I get home or when I use my bluetooth headset. There is no point to be fiddling with settings just so I can save .00000001 watts of power.

Just my $.99 opinion ;-)
Tsuius is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2012, 01:56 PM   #25
phyzics101
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
about time. Now we need a app for one button mobile hot spot.
__________________
MacBook Air 13" i7, iPhone 4 S⃣ , The New iPad, TV
phyzics101 is offline   2 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iPod touch stops charging when it turns on. Fatigue iPod touch 0 Feb 28, 2014 11:24 AM
iPod Touch 4 turns on differently than others Shift Option K iPod touch 7 Nov 30, 2013 03:30 PM
iPod touch turns off when connecting specific accessory tarryweather iPod touch 0 Jun 3, 2013 11:06 PM
iPod touch turns on then shuts off TaiO89 iPod touch 3 Jan 24, 2013 04:11 PM
iPod Touch turns off after sleep *Help* PlankingBob iPod touch 0 Jan 16, 2013 04:54 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC