Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 22, 2011, 01:51 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Financial Times Web App More Popular Than Native iOS App






The Financial Times reports its web app, launched this past June, has more readers than the version sold on the App Store, which has since been removed.

The web app has more than 700,000 readers according to Reuters. The FT chose to develop an HTML5 app rather than a native iOS app because Apple takes a 30% cut of subscription revenue made through the App Store, and refuses to hand over all the personal data on customers who subscribe to publications -- data which is worth a lot of money to publishers.
Quote:
FT.com Managing Director Rob Grimshaw told Reuters that the new Web-based app was drawing more traffic than the version that was sold through the App Store.

"People who are using the app are spending much more time with the content," he said. "They are consuming about three times as many pages through the app as they are through the desktop in an average visit."

The FT's Web-based mobile app accounts for 15 percent of FT.com subscriptions and 20 percent of total FT.com page views from mobile users, Grimshaw said.
The FT said that it was having no difficulty driving users to the mobile app, saying a simple message on the top of the FT's website has successfully driven traffic to the HTML5 app. "The world outside the App Store is not cold and desperate. Discovery is no problem at all."

Article Link: Financial Times Web App More Popular Than Native iOS App
MacRumors is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 02:03 PM   #2
Wildog27
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Site hits does not equal app downloads. That doesn't mean it's not impressive and doesn't have strong value to have a web app versus a native one, especially if you disagree with Apple's rules, but it's not a one-to-one comparison.
Wildog27 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 02:17 PM   #3
johncrab
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
I'm not buying that unless they are talking about gross hits or those who went to check out the site once. FT has some pretty creepy paywall policies which I found out with the app. Your "ten free articles per month" end up being zero. It always said I had used up my ten. Unless you subscribe to the print version at $250/yr and then to the online version for a further $350, you get nothing. Subscribing binds the user into a perpetual renewal contract unless canceled well in advance of the anniversary date at which time you lose any remaining time on the subscription. With FT being unable to count to 10, I opted for The Economist which offers free, full access with a print subscription. Those who can afford $600 per year for the FT are welcome to it.
johncrab is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 02:19 PM   #4
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildog27 View Post
Site hits does not equal app downloads. That doesn't mean it's not impressive and doesn't have strong value to have a web app versus a native one, especially if you disagree with Apple's rules, but it's not a one-to-one comparison.
Doesn't matter

"spending much more time with the content," he said. "They are consuming about three times as many pages through the app as they are through the desktop in an average visit."

Is the key part.

More time + More page views = higher advertising costs.

Advertisers love sites with longer views and increase readership.
samcraig is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 02:25 PM   #5
TraceyS/FL
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Central Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
and refuses to hand over all the personal data on customers who subscribe to publications -- data which is worth a lot of money to publishers.
Gee, this sounds like the number one reason to get all my subscriptions thru the app store. Less junk mail!!
TraceyS/FL is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 02:36 PM   #6
Laird Knox
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
The Financial Times reports its web app, launched this past June, has more readers than the version sold on the App Store, which has since been removed.


In other news, Ford outselling Pontiac which has since been discontinued.
Laird Knox is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 02:54 PM   #7
Consultant
macrumors G5
 
Consultant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
FT probably had some kind of promotion to make that happen.

In addition, what is the net gain from App Store vs. web app?
Consultant is offline   -3 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 03:15 PM   #8
Keebler
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
well duh, not everyone owns an iphone, but there are more computers than iphones / ipads so of course there would be more hits and maybe more dloads.
Keebler is offline   -2 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 03:41 PM   #9
Metal Dice
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Denmark
In other news, not everyone using webapps use Apple devices.
__________________
"There's that word again, heavy. Why are things so heavy in the future? Is there a problem with the earth's gravitational pull?"
Metal Dice is offline   -1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 03:48 PM   #10
belsokar
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
The quote seems deliberately worded. If you read it carefully, nowhere does it state an apples to apples comparison. While I'm not calling BS without knowing more, I would be surprised, as most content providers I have developed for, will most of the time select a native app experience because of the stickiness of the session. This means that app users tend to use the app longer, explore more, read more, etc....

I personally think they are combining numbers, and not mentioned iPad app numbers specifically so that they can hopefully stick it to apple that they are doing just fine without them. I'm happy if they are, but something seems a bit fishy here overall...
belsokar is offline   -1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 04:07 PM   #11
dhrlove
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

If cloud computing is the future, then web apps are the futer as well.
dhrlove is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 04:56 PM   #12
accessoriesguy
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
The web makes news very very affordable now a days.
__________________
accessoriesguy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 05:05 PM   #13
marksman
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_4 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8K2 Safari/6533.18.5)

Ashton kutcher has more twitter followers than his great grandpa too.
marksman is offline   -4 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 06:06 PM   #14
byke
macrumors 6502a
 
byke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN.
Wonder if other news papers will follow suit? Such as the times.
__________________
Loved jobs era Apple, very sceptical of Jonny era apple.
byke is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2011, 07:23 PM   #15
Elturco
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Lies lies lies

I am a paid FT subscriber..i love the native appp. But FT has been agressively pushing all the users to switch to the webapp to avoid paying future revenues to Apple. The main issue is that webapp is cache dependent. If you like to keep logged in, you cannot register your cookies etc. once you do so, you need to relog in with the webapp version. IOS 5 is coming with a private browse function that is clearing cache often, Which will force webapp users to relog in eachtime they use the webapp given they ios' private browse option is on.

Main reason FT webapp is more popular is only due to FTs aggressive force on native app users each time they use the app. It bugs to hell out of me to be promted that there is a webapp for FT, 5 times a day.
Elturco is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2011, 12:44 AM   #16
run76
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; de-de) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

Well I actually canceled my subscription because they were pushing this web app idea so hard. I take the train to work every day where I only have a very slow to partly non-existent Internet connection. So I used to download the ft before leaving and read it on the train. Not possible anymore. Thanks FT. And I am sure I ain't the only one who feels that way.
run76 is offline   -1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2011, 02:43 AM   #17
teme
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Native iOS app would be better of course, but I agree with publishers that Apple's 30% cut is too much, and I support publishers on this. And by the way, usually publishers have received personal info from subscribers, so why suddenly everyone is against it?
teme is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2011, 03:19 AM   #18
shotts56
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Quote:
Originally Posted by run76 View Post
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; de-de) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

Well I actually canceled my subscription because they were pushing this web app idea so hard. I take the train to work every day where I only have a very slow to partly non-existent Internet connection. So I used to download the ft before leaving and read it on the train. Not possible anymore. Thanks FT. And I am sure I ain't the only one who feels that way.
It is still possible, the web app downloads in exactly the same way for offline reading. That's exactly what I do before getting on a train or plane.

I was sceptical about the web app when they first announced it, but I think it's works excellently and kudos to them producing something so seamless out with the app store.
shotts56 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2011, 04:43 AM   #19
brilliantthings
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Wirelessly posted (Opera/9.80 (iPhone; Opera Mini/6.1.15738/25.872; U; en) Presto/2.5.25 Version/10.54)

I find it really irritating that they dont sell single issues on the web app. You can buy them in a Kindle, but not on a Kindle iOS app.

I wrote to FT about this. Theyre pretty smug and happy that you either subscribe or you dont read FT. I think the best way to get new regular subscribers is to let them buy single issues. I told them that - they didnt seem to care.

I used to buy single issues of the paper editions. Theyve lost me now though.
brilliantthings is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 2, 2012, 01:47 AM   #20
kiljoy616
macrumors 68000
 
kiljoy616's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
So how many here need Financial news at the level of FT?
__________________
AppleTV 2 + Ipad 2 64 GB (My jukebox) + iMac 27" i5 2.8Ghz 256GB SSD + 1TD HD + Macbook Air 2011 13" SSD 128GB iPhone 4S White
kiljoy616 is offline   -1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Post: Question with web app and iOS App. Rafael.Lepin iPhone/iPad Programming 9 Oct 30, 2013 01:12 PM
Google Brings Gmail iOS App Interface to Its Mobile Web App MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 28 Mar 13, 2013 04:48 PM
Do any of you prefer to use the Google Chrome app over the native Safari for web brow Myiphone7 iPhone 23 Jul 6, 2012 12:14 PM
why the ios app POCO camera is so popular in ASIA pocowuxian iPhone and iPod touch Apps 0 Jun 24, 2012 10:21 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC