Go Back   MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 8, 2012, 09:38 AM   #1
Todisco
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Pirating Songs wrong w/ iTunes Match Service?

What are everyone's thoughts on downloading songs through a torrent site if I pay for iTunes Match service - since the artist gets paid every time I play the song. Morally Wrong or not Morally Wrong ; Illegal or not Illegal???

Just seeing if I need to discuss my downloading habits next time I go to confession at church...
__________________
iMac 27" (2011) iPhone 5 iPad 2 ATV2 (3)
Todisco is offline   -6 Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2012, 11:45 AM   #2
pdjudd
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todisco View Post
What are everyone's thoughts on downloading songs through a torrent site if I pay for iTunes Match service - since the artist gets paid every time I play the song. Morally Wrong or not Morally Wrong ; Illegal or not Illegal???

Just seeing if I need to discuss my downloading habits next time I go to confession at church...
Since you never obtained them legitimately in the first place, simply subscribing to iTunes match doesn't make the tracks any more legal than laundering stolen money and replacing it with non stolen money. There is nothing in Apple's terms that makes piracy legal in any way shape or form - it is purely for upgrading and re-downloading music that you legally own but purchased elsewhere.
pdjudd is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2012, 12:04 PM   #3
GSPice
macrumors 68000
 
GSPice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todisco View Post
What are everyone's thoughts on downloading songs through a torrent site if I pay for iTunes Match service - since the artist gets paid every time I play the song. Morally Wrong or not Morally Wrong ; Illegal or not Illegal???

Just seeing if I need to discuss my downloading habits next time I go to confession at church...
If you're ok with someone stealing your car then legally registering it in their name without getting caught, then by all means, torrent away.

----------

Course, if you're asking this question in the first place, you probably couldn't appreciate the car ownership analogy - by assuming you own a car I assumed too much.
__________________
15" Haswell rMBP 2.3/16/512/750m | 24" iMac 3.06/500/4/8800 | Mac OS X 10.9.2
AEBS MC340LL/A | APC RS 800VA/XS 1000 | iPhone 5 16GB 7.1 | iPad 16GB LTE 7.1 | Apple TV 2
GSPice is offline   -4 Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2012, 12:12 PM   #4
gwelmarten
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: England!
Wrong for iTunes match to work with these songs. Don't download them to start with!
gwelmarten is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2012, 10:49 PM   #5
rbrian
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Illegal and morally wrong. The annual fee is likely far less than the cost of buying the music, and it goes to apple to run their servers, not the artist.
__________________
2011 11" Air i5 1.6/4/128; 2011 Mac mini; iPad mini retina 128GB; iPhone 5s 64GB; Apple TV3
rbrian is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2012, 02:16 AM   #6
barredfreak
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
As wrong as it can be.
barredfreak is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2012, 05:07 AM   #7
NutsNGum
macrumors 68030
 
NutsNGum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todisco View Post
Just seeing if I need to discuss my downloading habits next time I go to confession at church...
Seriously? I think if there is a God, it has bigger fish to fry.
NutsNGum is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2012, 06:54 AM   #8
tkermit
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Sometimes it helps to read the terms and conditions:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apple
You hereby agree to use iTunes Match only for lawfully acquired content. Any use for illegitimate content infringes the rights of others and may subject you to civil and criminal penalties, including possible monetary damages, for copyright infringement.
__________________
___🏃_
tkermit is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2012, 07:17 AM   #9
sim667
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSPice View Post
If you're ok with someone stealing your car then legally registering it in their name without getting caught, then by all means, torrent away.

----------

Course, if you're asking this question in the first place, you probably couldn't appreciate the car ownership analogy - by assuming you own a car I assumed too much.
well hang on there, its a bit more like you building your own car, which you then give to someone else and they hire to other people. They make a profit of your hardwork, whilst you make a pittance. Then someone makes a carbon copy of the car for their own enjoyment whilst you carry on whoring yourself out to a third party to make them profit whilst you recieve f all.

It goes without saying I dont have an issue with true music fans swapping music.... What I disagree with is people downloading tripe just so they can compare itunes library size, which is a bit like comparing willies in the street, and unfortunately stuff like that is perpetuated by threads like 'how big is your itunes library' which can be found on forums such as this.

----------

Also itunes match swaps all your explicit lyric stuff for clean stuff,...... so its actually a bit rubbish.

Zumocast allows you to download your music to your iphone etc for free.
__________________
Mac Pro, Macbook Pro, G4 Powerbook, iPad 4, iPhone 5, 2X TV, Nikon D800, ACSP Trained - Photography and Mac tech
Music and UK festival Blog
sim667 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2012, 07:29 AM   #10
pdjudd
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by sim667 View Post
well hang on there, its a bit more like you building your own car, which you then give to someone else and they hire to other people. They make a profit of your hardwork, whilst you make a pittance. Then someone makes a carbon copy of the car for their own enjoyment whilst you carry on whoring yourself out to a third party to make them profit whilst you recieve f all.\
No that is not an apt analogy at all. The business mechanics of the recording industry have nothing to do with piracy - unless you are trying to justify the latter. Lets put it this way, if you are stealing music the artist who was screwed earlier is just more screwed now since he won’t make any more money.
pdjudd is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2012, 10:52 AM   #11
vahnx
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
It's an "unintended consequence" to launder your music. Apple doesn't really care about this unintended consequence so +1
vahnx is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2012, 11:47 AM   #12
pdjudd
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by vahnx View Post
It's an "unintended consequence" to launder your music. Apple doesn't really care about this unintended consequence so +1
Yes they do - their terms indicate that they do care. Trouble is, there isn't any way for them to know what is legit and what is stolen if the two are identical. Besides, they aren't interested in prosecuting people - they leave that to the actual owners.
pdjudd is offline   -1 Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2012, 01:42 PM   #13
mlmwalt
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Philadelphia, Pa, USA
I say... Spend a buck & get an iPod with enough storage that you won't need iTunes Match Service.... Go to confession... Say a few Hail Mary's and a few more Novina's.... Problem solved....
mlmwalt is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2012, 02:26 PM   #14
chris200x9
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
It's still *wrong*

(is piracy wrong in the first place?)
chris200x9 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2012, 04:40 PM   #15
lilcosco08
macrumors 65816
 
lilcosco08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dayton
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSPice View Post
If you're ok with someone stealing your car, leaving an identical copy of it, then legally registering it in their name without getting caught, then by all means, torrent away.

----------

Course, if you're asking this question in the first place, you probably couldn't appreciate the car ownership analogy - by assuming you own a car I assumed too much.
Fixed

I don't fully support piracy, I just hate that analogy
__________________
iPhone 4s 16gb- iPad Mini 32gb
Steam ID: lilcosco - 3DS FC: 1547-5234-4748
lilcosco08 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2012, 10:56 AM   #16
GSPice
macrumors 68000
 
GSPice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilcosco08 View Post
Fixed

I don't fully support piracy, I just hate that analogy
Wow. What's the point of an analogy if it's gonna turn into a precise legal definition of the original statement?

Goodness.

__________________
15" Haswell rMBP 2.3/16/512/750m | 24" iMac 3.06/500/4/8800 | Mac OS X 10.9.2
AEBS MC340LL/A | APC RS 800VA/XS 1000 | iPhone 5 16GB 7.1 | iPad 16GB LTE 7.1 | Apple TV 2
GSPice is offline   -2 Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2012, 07:07 AM   #17
sim667
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdjudd View Post
No that is not an apt analogy at all. The business mechanics of the recording industry have nothing to do with piracy - unless you are trying to justify the latter. Lets put it this way, if you are stealing music the artist who was screwed earlier is just more screwed now since he won’t make any more money.
If I was a musician I'd rather get screwed by joe bloggs off the street then by a multi billion dollar corporation.

----------

Of course you could try listening to some other more inventive stuff which is on available netlabels for free rather than listening and buying what the tv and the papers tell you to listen to.
__________________
Mac Pro, Macbook Pro, G4 Powerbook, iPad 4, iPhone 5, 2X TV, Nikon D800, ACSP Trained - Photography and Mac tech
Music and UK festival Blog
sim667 is offline   -1 Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2012, 08:18 AM   #18
iEvolution
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Itunes match sucks, it makes a mess of your library and gets songs wrong, specifically clean versions get downloaded instead of explicit. Apple really dropped the ball with what could have been a great service.
iEvolution is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2012, 09:19 AM   #19
pdjudd
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by sim667 View Post
If I was a musician I'd rather get screwed by joe bloggs off the street then by a multi billion dollar corporation.
Good! When you are a musician that can publish their music, you can make that choice then. But you cannot make that choice for other musicians, many of which are not being screwed and run their businesses quite well.
pdjudd is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2012, 10:17 AM   #20
sim667
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdjudd View Post
Good! When you are a musician that can publish their music, you can make that choice then. But you cannot make that choice for other musicians, many of which are not being screwed and run their businesses quite well.
If by 'running their business quite well' you mean 'dominating music, destroying creativity and closing the door to newcomers' I completely agree with you.

In the music scene I listen to, actually 90% of the new releases are given away free, which means a good source of quality music at no expense, more of an inclination to go see the people live, an interest in more obscure and hard to find tunes as we can afford to.

In all honesty piracy has given the industry a bit of a wake up call in that it was taking the mickey greatly...... if you can explain how a record label could justify charging £20 for an album in 1999, and in 2009 the same labels were selling new albums for £4.99-£6.99 and still making a profit, I'd love to hear it.
__________________
Mac Pro, Macbook Pro, G4 Powerbook, iPad 4, iPhone 5, 2X TV, Nikon D800, ACSP Trained - Photography and Mac tech
Music and UK festival Blog
sim667 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2012, 11:08 AM   #21
pdjudd
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by sim667 View Post
If by 'running their business quite well' you mean 'dominating music, destroying creativity and closing the door to newcomers' I completely agree with you.
No, you are missing my argument to make some misguided point. I am talking about regular musicians who are trying to make a buck. Piracy is not moral I don't care who it's from. It isn't legal. Simply put you cannot decide the fate of something you do not own. Period. You aren't the rights holder to the music? Tough. If the artist wants to give away their music? That is their choice. You are not the decider as to the fate of other people's IP. I don't care what anybody did to another person. If a company screwed an artist, that is up to the courts to resolve it. You don't get to use that as a justification to do anything other than to not do business with them. It's still piracy to obtain the content without the owners consent.

Subscribing to iTunes Match changes nothing morality wise. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

Quote:
In the music scene I listen to, actually 90% of the new releases are given away free, which means a good source of quality music at no expense, more of an inclination to go see the people live, an interest in more obscure and hard to find tunes as we can afford to.
And that decision is made by the legal owners and is their decision and I do not fault them one iota. But if somebody doesn't want to do that, doesn't mean that you can do what you want with it.
pdjudd is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2012, 01:42 PM   #22
psingh01
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
I think that is the whole purpose of the matching service. It is a way for the publishers to recover income for songs that have been pirated in the past. They won't advertise it as such but IMO that's the only reason why the record companies signed off on such a deal. It really seems like the type of idea Jobs would have sold to the music execs.
psingh01 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2012, 06:41 AM   #23
*Calypso*
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by psingh01 View Post
I think that is the whole purpose of the matching service. It is a way for the publishers to recover income for songs that have been pirated in the past. They won't advertise it as such but IMO that's the only reason why the record companies signed off on such a deal. It really seems like the type of idea Jobs would have sold to the music execs.
I think it's the whole purpose of cloud-based music services to allow the music industry to double-charge you. Explain to the average customer why he must pay again for songs he already bought.
*Calypso* is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2012, 08:30 AM   #24
pdjudd
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by *Calypso* View Post
I think it's the whole purpose of cloud-based music services to allow the music industry to double-charge you. Explain to the average customer why he must pay again for songs he already bought.
Licensed, not bought. Different things here folks.
pdjudd is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2012, 12:09 PM   #25
*Calypso*
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdjudd View Post
Licensed, not bought. Different things here folks.
Licensed for unlimited private use, hence not to be charged for another time. If this is not clear and still leaves the music industry in the position to charge you again every time you transfer your music to a new device, maybe it is time for a more customer-friendly legislation.

If it's a true license (to play and copy music privately), it should be independent from the source or medium.

How many people have to buy a digital download, because the CD they bought earlier is copy-protected? How many people have to buy a CD because the digital download is DRM-infected? How much of your yearly iTunes Match fee is going directly to the music industry to pay for music you licensed years ago by buying the CD?

It is time for the industry to give us an open and independent media licensing system, for instance run by a non-profit organisation representing the industry as well as consumer organisations such as the EFF. Maybe like UltraViolet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UltraViolet_%28system%29) without the DRM-crap. But I guess that is not in the industry's interest, because they want to charge us again when the first audio CDs chemically disolve in 20 years or when a large DRM-server is destroyed in a fire.

Imagine this for a moment: You buy a license for a song, a movie, a book. On average, you pay $0.79 for a song, $7.90 for a movie and $9.90 for a 300 page book. You get a key which allows you to obtain a digital copy in the highest available quality from a server. In addition you can purchase a hard-copy of a CD/Blu-ray or as a printed book for $1.50/$2.50/$7.50, just as you find them in regular stores. All major cloud services already host copies of all this media, so you only need your personal key to stream online. Improved versions of the media (remastered Audio, 4K-video, etc.) of course comes at a small upgrade fee. And of course you are allowed to resell all your obtained licences, but not separately from the CD/Blu-ray/Book.

Highly unlikely, I know. It is the double- and triple-charging that keeps a mostly dead industry alive.
*Calypso* is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iTunes Match songs vs. downloaded songs zoezoezoe iCloud and Apple Services 1 Sep 21, 2013 12:48 PM
iTunes Match won't Match iTunes Store Songs SpeedFleX iCloud and Apple Services 0 Aug 21, 2013 07:11 AM
Why didn't iTunes Match, Match my songs? trvsglr iCloud and Apple Services 3 Jan 11, 2013 07:04 PM
iTunes Match: Tricks to get songs to match? Icculus iCloud and Apple Services 2 Dec 7, 2012 12:35 PM
What Happens to Songs That Have No Match Using iTunes Match? HeezyBear iCloud and Apple Services 2 Jun 24, 2012 10:38 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC