Wii U, will you?

I don't care about the hardware really, I want to see some games!

Until I here some definite information on games, then I could not care less about the Wii U.

Well personally I always get really excited for any new console release and the Wii U is no exception. I'm really excited for E3 and it can't come soon enough. This may be Nintendo's best E3 press conference in a long time and after the embarrassment of their Wii U reveal last year I have high hopes for them. Hopefully most if not all of the rumours that have recently surfaced have truth in them. All I know is that I will be buying the Wii U on day one and have faith that Nintendo will deliver.

I've found Nintendo products to be getting more uncomfortable to hold ever generation. Today I played Smash Bros Brawl with a GC controller for around 3 hours and not once did the controls ever get in the way or did I become concious of it. I find the Wii to be uncomfy for long plays and the 3DS has an awful dpad and circle pad. My only worry is the WiiU will also be a pain to hold. I'll have a play at E3.

But yeah I'll get one. It'll be the only place to get new Mario, both 2D and 3D, new Zelda, new Metroids, Smash Bros etc.

Dagless said:

I've found Nintendo products to be getting more uncomfortable to hold ever generation. Today I played Smash Bros Brawl with a GC controller for around 3 hours and not once did the controls ever get in the way or did I become concious of it. I find the Wii to be uncomfy for long plays and the 3DS has an awful dpad and circle pad. My only worry is the WiiU will also be a pain to hold. I'll have a play at E3.

But yeah I'll get one. It'll be the only place to get new Mario, both 2D and 3D, new Zelda, new Metroids, Smash Bros etc.

Click to expand...

Yes, I agree with you too. And te more peripheral crap for the controllers just make them more uncomfortable.

3DS clear demonstration of bad control design is evident in the fact that games like Kid Icarus have to use a stand to stop you getting RSI injurys is clear evidence. Likewise the terrible control pad pro which off centres the screen in your control so you have to compensate by holding the unit more to the right, leading to further strain. And don't get me started on Nubs and weeeeshie buttons.

boy-better-know said:

Uni revision is slowly killing me, so I thought I would take a break and look at some gaming sites and came across the news that the Wii U tablet controller is having proper analogue nubs (Woo Hoo). Rather than the 3DS slider things. Not that it is massive news or anything but it spurred me on to look back at E3 2011 and some of the Wii U demos. Didn't really care before, I was hooked on the Vita coverage last year, but now I think I want one though I suspect it will be severely lacking in specs compared to PS4/neXtbox.

I think it's my inner 10 year old thinking about playing HD Mario. We normally have a good debate on here so what do you all think about the limited info we have already?

Click to expand...

yes I'll be getting one but with reservations. I play my cube/Q still (replaying wind-waker at moment) 10 years on, the Wii mostly gathers dust. Hate motion controller, hate that games don't accommodate left handed users.

I bought Twilight Princess on the Wii, and ended up unable to play it comfortably, so went out and bought the GameCube version. Just the difference a controller makes to the experience is massive.

Im not sold on the Wii U, I'm not even sure if it will be a success given the likely 6-12 months difference before the PS4 or Next Xbox will be out with much better according to reports specifications. Yet I buy every new console so yep I'll be there on launch day regardless...

boy-better-know said:

The controller does look incredibly uncomfortable, not something you can really get your hands around. Would like to feel the weight too, it needs to be light. For example, going from the iPad 2 to the iPad 3, it has become uncomfortable holding it with one hand (maybe because I'm not that strong).
Wow, so you're going to E3, you will have to report back here! Enjoy.

Click to expand...

It's very light apparently. But it would be. All it is is a screen, controller (probably no rumble) wireless dohickeys and a battery. An iPad has to house a much more complex motherboard, GPU and CPU, bigger battery etc.

I've heard it's good to hold. But even if it was awful I'd still get one just because it's where most of my favourite gaming series will be going.

boy-better-know said:

Very true, looking further into it I am reading people saying that it is surprisingly comfortable.

One issue I must pick with the Wii U is the actual console itself. Considering this is an Apple discussion site, I presume that we all appreciate good product design. The Wii U box, to me, looks horrible. Like a small room de-humidifier or something. In fact, I was so confused watching the E3 conference, I was unsure if it was a new console or just a new controller. They really are not pushing the box which is understandable (given the special nature of the controller). But I love a good old fashioned industrially designed box. I hope they re-design it into something I would want to display next to my TV.

Click to expand...

Yet we live in a world with this.

boy-better-know said:

the Game Cube was great, because it looked fun, everytime I looked at it I wanted to turn it on. Each to their own.

Click to expand...

Sounds like a case of Objectophilia, as you say, to each their own .

boy-better-know said:

Also, the Game Cube was great, because it looked fun, everytime I looked at it I wanted to turn it on. Each to their own.

Click to expand...

Sexiest console ever made

I'm excited for the Wii U, although I'm fully expecting that only the first party games will really wow me. I hope I am wrong though.

I will not Wii U, will stay w/ my PS3 & vanilla Wii.

Not planning on it. My Super Nintendo still fulfills my occasional Mario and Zelda needs, and it does so without any waggely gimmicks.

Considering in my house the Wii is nothing but a glorified dust collector, no, I won't be buying a Wii U. It's nice to see Nintendo finally caught up to 2006 graphics wise though

I highly doubt the mass that bought the Wii will buy the Wii U, it'll be interesting to see how Nintendo copes with it.

I'll likely get the next PS since my PS3 has served me so well. It's a great addition to my home theater with blu-ray, DLNA, and Netflix/Amazon VOD/many varieties of streaming options as well as a being great gaming console.

They do have an uphill battle.

^ True. I know dozens of people who picked up the Wii and Wii Sports and played it over xmas one year - only to gather dust the remaining. These are not gamers - but folks normally not interested in gaming. But whilst Nintendo sold them on Wii Sports and maybe Wii Fit, they didn't purchase any follow up software and after the initial usage the Wii became much like a Sandwich Toaster.

Those are the folks that made the big sales on the Wii, and they are the ones that have subsequently stopped, and I don't see Nintendo being able to sell them another Wii this time around.

It seems this is why then the 'hardcore' gamer who Nintendo let slip with Wii, are now starting to be referenced with the Wii U. But most of those folks now have PS3's or 360's and if the Wii can only equal or slightly better what they currently have on a technical level, I likewise can't see them getting these to invest another $300-350 on a new machine, when they still have memories of being burned by the Wii and it's shovel ware collection.



I won't rule them out of the game this early though, I think its clear Nintendo certainly know how to market their stuff (even if it's no longer a market that is relevant to the avid gamer) and if E3 provides enough tantalizing games they could beat the odds and succeed in coming up with a successful successor.

MacRumorUser said:

^ True. I know dozens of people who picked up the Wii and Wii Sports and played it over xmas one year - only to gather dust the remaining. These are not gamers - but folks normally not interested in gaming. But whilst Nintendo sold them on Wii Sports and maybe Wii Fit, they didn't purchase any follow up software and after the initial usage the Wii became much like a Sandwich Toaster.

Those are the folks that made the big sales on the Wii, and they are the ones that have subsequently stopped, and I don't see Nintendo being able to sell them another Wii this time around.

It seems this is why then the 'hardcore' gamer who Nintendo let slip with Wii, are now starting to be referenced with the Wii U. But most of those folks now have PS3's or 360's and if the Wii can only equal or slightly better what they currently have on a technical level, I likewise can't see them getting these to invest another $300-350 on a new machine, when they still have memories of being burned by the Wii and it's shovel ware collection.



I won't rule them out of the game this early though, I think its clear Nintendo certainly know how to market their stuff (even if it's no longer a market that is relevant to the avid gamer) and if E3 provides enough tantalizing games they could beat the odds and succeed in coming up with a successful successor.

Click to expand...

Yeah I agree with most of this. What made the Wii so successful was that anyone, especially old women in nursing homes, could pick up the Wiimote and point at a screen and do a motion with their hands without memorizing that many buttons. With Kinect there are zero buttons and it's just your body. With U it's a huge controller and screen and it takes away what made the Wii what it was, ease of use to make up for pathetic graphics. I agree the holiday/family focused Wii bowling sessions won't occur on the U, so I'll be curious to see who buys it, and I can't wait for the first two weeks of June.

If Wii U lets me play Earthbound on Virtual Console I'll have it in a heartbeat!

boy-better-know said:

The thing that sold the Wii to the masses and not the hardcores was the motion control. A gimmick imho that people thought was revolutionary.

Click to expand...

I feel like gimmick is too strong a word because there are certainly instances where motion controls are a lot of fun and can provide experiences that traditional input methods cannot. They are better for niche uses though. A controller or KB/M are much better at interfacing w/a wide variety of games.


Lethal

I won't Wii U (Me). The amount of absolutely awful games released for the Wii with absolutely no quality control from Nintendos side, coupled with the majority of the games having wiggle controls for absolutely no reason that just lowered the enjoyment of playing, and how awful Nintendo blew the online side of the Wii, made my decision.

I would like to play more Zelda, but I don't think it is worth it...

boy-better-know said:

I agree, but that zelda demo (which Nintendo have refused to confirm or deny if it is an upcoming title) they showed looked really sweet.

Click to expand...

They have stated a gazillion times that it was just a tech demo.

T'hain Esh Kelch said:

The amount of absolutely awful games released for the Wii with absolutely no quality control from Nintendos side

Click to expand...

This sums it up rather well

I am not going to be getting the Wii U either. Like everyone here is saying, the games are just not worth it. We buy one like every month, play some of it, then it never gets picked up again.

The funny thing is that the Gamecube games get played more on the Wii than the actual Wii games at our house.

MacRumorUser said:

^ True. I know dozens of people who picked up the Wii and Wii Sports and played it over xmas one year - only to gather dust the remaining. These are not gamers - but folks normally not interested in gaming. But whilst Nintendo sold them on Wii Sports and maybe Wii Fit, they didn't purchase any follow up software and after the initial usage the Wii became much like a Sandwich Toaster.

Click to expand...

Sandwich Toaster clip from Spaced:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYvPzTYd3Mo