Can a 12" PB handle FCP?

Well, I'm a 12 incher and mine is a rev a. So...thats 867mhz, 256 cache (as opposed to the higher 512 now) and 640 ram. FCP runs fine on this one, not the fastest, but it does the trick. However, I don't use FCP that much, I only have it because I needed it for one of my courses at UMaine and they let me have a version I could only use while on campus (using key access.) Point being, if you are going to be doing a TON of FCP, get something with more balls, but if not, you should be set. Besides, 64mb of vid ram isn't *that* bad.

xray have u ever used fcp or done any seriuos editing?

It depends on how often you are going to be editing and on what kind of projects. Power wouldn't concern me as much as screen size. Doing any kind of in depth editing on that tiny ass screen would just suck. I have two 17" CRT's and I wish I had more screen space. You'd probably also wanna use and external keyboard and mouse. Again, only assuming you are going to be using it on a fairly regular basis.

Editing on a 12" Pb is certainly doable. But so is running a marathon in ill-fiting shoes.


Lethal

yes, as well as any Mac will run it short of a G5, but what kills you is the lack of screen space. I wouldn't want my 12in PB as my main FCP machine, but it'll do in a pinch.

All Systems go

Sounds like an adaquate system to be running that stuff, back in the day I used a 700Mh G3 iBook and an external hard drive, to edit my high school video yearbook, I was running FCP3, and it ran fine. (For the exception of 128Mb memory, rendering took a while, but patience is a virtue, or so I'm told.)

I would wait on buying a powerbook. I think they are going to be replaced soon.

Don't let the Intel switch cause you to wait. When FCP with universal binaries comes out, it's unknown whether FCP will run better or worse on Intel compared to PPC. It's a safe bet that it will take Apple a year or two before FCP on Intel is better than FCP on PPC. The Rosetta business doesn't quite apply to FCP because of all the Altivec optimization. However, any Intel Mac should run FCP 3 (by way of Rosetta) perfectly fine, except for the realtime stuff that requires Altivec.

A 12" PowerBook will run FCP nicely. You can use the Digital Cinema Desktop feature to overcome the 1024x768 resolution.

I use FCP on my powerbook G4 400 mhz on a regular basis.

I cut together a feature length film on my 12" 1ghz powerbook with a tiny 768 meg of ram and it worked perfectly. Don't let the "enthusiasts" fool you. Video work does NOT require hefty sys requirements. It takes a little longer to render and it cant do many effects on the fly but it works perfectly fine. In the end your just chopping up video files, it isn't system intensive until you start hammering out layer upon layer of video

enclave said:

I cut together a feature length film on my 12" 1ghz powerbook with a tiny 768 meg of ram and it worked perfectly. Don't let the "enthusiasts" fool you. Video work does NOT require hefty sys requirements. It takes a little longer to render and it cant do many effects on the fly but it works perfectly fine. In the end your just chopping up video files, it isn't system intensive until you start hammering out layer upon layer of video

Click to expand...

Nobody's said it won't work. But different people have different idea's of what is "good enough" and we were just presenting the possible short comings of using a 12" PB.

Heck, a movie in Sundance was cut in iMovie, but I'm not about to go tell people to ditch FCE or FCP because of it.

And about video requirements, DV doesn't require hefty hardware anymore (HDV requires a bit more than DV), but many video formats do.


Lethal

LethalWolfe said:

Nobody's said it won't work. But different people have different idea's of what is "good enough" and we were just presenting the possible short comings of using a 12" PB.

Heck, a movie in Sundance was cut in iMovie, but I'm not about to go tell people to ditch FCE or FCP because of it.

And about video requirements, DV doesn't require hefty hardware anymore (HDV requires a bit more than DV), but many video formats do.


Lethal

Click to expand...

I think people tend to forget that editors were cutting things on g3's not so long ago.

A g4 processor is more than sufficent for DV work, unless there cutting some form of HD. "whats good enough" I would say the ability to do anything required for dv editing is "good enough". A g5 is superfluous when you only cut dv footage.

enclave said:

I think people tend to forget that editors were cutting things on g3's not so long ago.

Click to expand...

And before that were Avids on PM 9600's. And before that were Video Toasters/DVEs. And before that was good old, no frills deck-to-deck editing.

What is your point?

A g4 processor is more than sufficent for DV work, unless there cutting some form of HD. "whats good enough" I would say the ability to do anything required for dv editing is "good enough". A g5 is superfluous when you only cut dv footage.

Click to expand...

Just because it's good enough for you doesn't mean it's good enough for everyone else. A G5 is overkill if you do cuts only DV editing and/or don't edit very often. If you are getting paid by the hour to do proc intensive work (lots of layers, fx, mattes, keys, etc.,) then a G5 is more than worth it, and a 12" PB would not be far from good enough. Again, just because it fits YOUR needs doesn't mean it fits EVERYONE's needs.

Of course, what makes this conversation even more fun is the fact that nobody (especially not me) said the 12" was a bad choice, but you came in guns blazing anyway. Per my first post, my biggest concern w/using a 12" PB for light editing isn't power it's ergonomics. A 12" PB can get cramped pretty fast which is why I mentioned using an external monitor and KB/M.



Lethal

"And before that were Avids on PM 9600's. And before that were Video Toasters/DVEs. And before that was good old, no frills deck-to-deck editing.

What is your point" _ Lethal

Heh, my point is that despite your frivolous comments, he isn't a power user he just wanted to know if it would work, and for his needs, yes it IS a good option. A G5 is unnecessary

Well I don't use the powerbook as is. I have my external monitor and keyboard. Irregardless he only asked

"I'm a switcher-in-waiting currently in the market for a portable, and I want one that can handle video editing as well. " - OP

so yeh, it is a good choice, perhaps the perfect choice. Your comment regarding the powerbook

"Editing on a 12" Pb is certainly doable. But so is running a marathon in ill-fitting shoes" was misleading and just plain wrong.

So yeh I went to bat for the powerbook, because people like you suggest people buy things they don't require. He's not a power user, so why are you suggesting he is? Oh what fun! I'm not trying to bug you, I was just pointing out what I think the OP should know, that's all.

xrayzed said:

I might use the PB 12" screen for rough edits but I plan to use my 17" LCD for the serious editing.

In answer in Espnetboy3: Serious editing? No.

I've done a bit in Premiere on Win XP (I'm not crazy about the interface, which is one of the reasons I want to switch), but I'm not an experienced editor.

Click to expand...

You should look into final cut express

enclave said:

"And before that were Avids on PM 9600's. And before that were Video Toasters/DVEs. And before that was good old, no frills deck-to-deck editing.

What is your point" _ Lethal

Heh, my point is that despite your frivolous comments, he isn't a power user he just wanted to know if it would work, and for his needs, yes it IS a good option. A G5 is unnecessary

Click to expand...

Round and round we go. Where did I suggest the thread starter needed to get a G5? And how, by the OP, do you magically gather what his needs are? Please reread my first reply.

Well I don't use the powerbook as is. I have my external monitor and keyboard. Irregardless he only asked

Click to expand...

Fantasic. That fixes the only possible snag I mentioned w/using the 12" pb for editing.

"I'm a switcher-in-waiting currently in the market for a portable, and I want one that can handle video editing as well. " - OP

so yeh, it is a good choice, perhaps the perfect choice. Your comment regarding the powerbook

Click to expand...

The OP has no info regarding where the PB was destined for heavy editing or not. Reread my reply (especially the first two lines).

"Editing on a 12" Pb is certainly doable. But so is running a marathon in ill-fitting shoes" was misleading and just plain wrong.

Click to expand...

Lighten up it was a joke. the "" usually gives that way...

So yeh I went to bat for the powerbook, because people like you suggest people buy things they don't require. He's not a power user, so why are you suggesting he is?

Click to expand...

I never suggested anything of the sort. Again, go reread my first post.

Just because I wasn't praising the 12" PB as god's gift to mobile editing doesn't mean I was damning it.

The ONLY thing I said in regards to the OP that could be construed as negative is IF you are editing on a regular basis w/a 12" PB you MIGHT want to consider using an external monitor and kb/m for the sake of ergonomics. Not exactly scathing criticism... geez.



Lethal

"Lighten up it was a joke. the " " usually gives that way..."

Oh right, NOW it's a joke.. I see.

It's easy to back away from a disagreement when you change what you said. If this was the case why didnt you just mention it in your first response to me instead of getting upset?

Suffice to say your comments were suggestive, irregardless of your choice of "emoticon"

I hope all goes well with your purchase OP

enclave said:

"Lighten up it was a joke. the " " usually gives that way..."

Oh right, NOW it's a joke.. I see.

It's easy to back away from a disagreement when you change what you said. If this was the case why didnt you just mention it in your first response to me instead of getting upset?

Suffice to say your comments were suggestive, irregardless of your choice of "emoticon"

I hope all goes well with your purchase OP

Click to expand...

Oh dear lord...

The "ill-fitting shoes" comment was always meant to be cheeky, and it was the only part meant to be cheeky.


Lethal

joecool85 said:

Well, I'm a 12 incher and mine is a rev a. So...thats 867mhz, 256 cache (as opposed to the higher 512 now) and 640 ram. FCP runs fine on this one, not the fastest, but it does the trick. However, I don't use FCP that much, I only have it because I needed it for one of my courses at UMaine and they let me have a version I could only use while on campus (using key access.) Point being, if you are going to be doing a TON of FCP, get something with more balls, but if not, you should be set. Besides, 64mb of vid ram isn't *that* bad.

Click to expand...

We do our video editing on the same exact PB, works like a charm. Just plan to get the biggest hd, lots of ram, and possibly an external hard drive to keep your stuff on because video takes up lots of space...

xrayzed said:

Apple RAM is so *pricey*.

Click to expand...

Don't buy it from Apple. Buy it from Crucial (MacRumors site sponsor) or find it through http://www.ramseeker.com (RAM price comparison site).

xrayzed said:

Indeed. I'm looking at a La Cie 250GB external HD.

I'm still weighing up whether to cram in as much RAM as I can, or given this is basically an interim machine, to make do with 1 GB of RAM. Apple RAM is so *pricey*.

Click to expand...

Holy smokes dude, never buy RAM from Apple. N-E-V-E-R.

crucial.com is a good place to buy RAM that plays nice w/Macs. Macs tend to have tighter tolerences than PCs so cheap-o RAM typically turns a Mac into a doorstop until you remove it.

I think 1 gig or RAM will be okay. I've only got 1gig on my dual gig G4 Quicksilver and I regularly have After Effects, Photoshop, and FCP HD running at the same time w/o unacceptable slow downs.


Lethal