INQ CEO: Android is for geeks

[raptorstv]

http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/3866...roid-for-geeks

can this be possibly true? maybe instead of "if you don't have an iphone, well, you don't have an iphone" stupid line, Apple should use "if you don't have an iphone, well, you ain't gonna get no hot chick, son!"

[Tarzanman]

Obvious troll is obvious? Lol, just kidding.

You should consider the source. The guy just released an *Android 2.2 device*

It seems to me like maybe his brain is stuck in 2010

I'm not going to bother extolling the virtues of Android 4.x. If you haven't used a device running it, then you should give one a test spin and make up your own mind.

[RolandNights]

Originally Posted by raptorstv

http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/3866...roid-for-geeks

can this be possibly true? maybe instead of "if you don't have an iphone, well, you don't have an iphone" stupid line, Apple should use "if you don't have an iphone, well, you ain't gonna get no hot chick, son!"

The whole article is a joke. He goes on about "building desire" and claiming that the Samsung Galaxy brand carries no weight just because he thinks the name is boring....And yet he calls his budget Android 2.2 (that's right--2.2) phone the Cloud Touch. LOL