Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > Mac Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 26, 2012, 03:48 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Releases Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 3.14






Apple today released Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 3.14, bringing RAW image support to Aperture and iPhoto for several new cameras.
Quote:
This update adds RAW image compatibility for the following cameras to Aperture 3 and iPhoto '11:

- Canon EOS Rebel T4i / 650D / Kiss X6i
- Sony Alpha SLT-A37
Full details on RAW support are included in an Apple support document.

Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 3.14 checks in at 7.9 MB and requires Mac OS X 10.6.8 or OS X 10.7 or later.

Article Link: Apple Releases Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 3.14
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2012, 04:01 PM   #2
zin
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: United Kingdom
There must be a better way to deliver these compatibility updates.

Why don't they implement dynamic updating capabilities (i.e. maintaining a constant connection to the update server for these updates, so the user doesn't have to concern themselves with manually installing, and they install automatically when iPhoto/Aperture is re-launched)?
zin is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2012, 04:09 PM   #3
lars666
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Can't get enough of these sexy RAW updates, especially as I have never owned a digital camera ...
lars666 is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2012, 04:23 PM   #4
adildacoolset
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lusaka, Zambia(If you know where it is)
If only I understood what this stuff means, I'd appreciate it more.
__________________
Last edited by adildacoolset; Tomorrow at 09:42 AM. Reason: grammar error
adildacoolset is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2012, 04:29 PM   #5
iMikeT
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: California
Of course.... This has to happen AFTER I updated my iMac yesterday.
iMikeT is offline   -6 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2012, 04:30 PM   #6
guzhogi
macrumors 68020
 
guzhogi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wherever my feet take me…
Quote:
Originally Posted by zin View Post
There must be a better way to deliver these compatibility updates.

Why don't they implement dynamic updating capabilities (i.e. maintaining a constant connection to the update server for these updates, so the user doesn't have to concern themselves with manually installing, and they install automatically when iPhoto/Aperture is re-launched)?
Add upon that what they do for printer drivers, when one is connected, detect what kind it is & download the appropriate software. This way, you don't get the software for boatloads of other cameras.
guzhogi is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2012, 04:33 PM   #7
marcusj0015
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adildacoolset View Post
If only I understood what this stuff means, I'd appreciate it more.
RAW means everything from the Image Sensor is saved, and it's completely lossless, Jpg is for lulzy tards, Raw is the future.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by zin View Post
There must be a better way to deliver these compatibility updates.

Why don't they implement dynamic updating capabilities (i.e. maintaining a constant connection to the update server for these updates, so the user doesn't have to concern themselves with manually installing, and they install automatically when iPhoto/Aperture is re-launched)?
Exactly!
marcusj0015 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2012, 04:53 PM   #8
Amazing Iceman
macrumors 68020
 
Amazing Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida, U.S.A.
There's also an iTunes Producer 2.7.0 update weighting 69.9 MB

iTunes Producer 2.7 includes several new features:

Import templates are now included.
Music metadata is now supporting additional languages.
General bug fixes and improvements.
More detailed information on this update can be found in the iTunes Producer guide available at itunesconnect.apple.com.
__________________
17" MacBook Pro (2007) iPad Air WiFi+Cell 128 GB iPhone 5s 64 GB T-Mobile AppleTV 2
Follow @AmazingIceman for useful tech info and more (mention MacRumors).
Amazing Iceman is offline   -1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2012, 08:17 PM   #9
nuladog
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by zin View Post
There must be a better way to deliver these compatibility updates.

Why don't they implement dynamic updating capabilities (i.e. maintaining a constant connection to the update server for these updates, so the user doesn't have to concern themselves with manually installing, and they install automatically when iPhoto/Aperture is re-launched)?
Coming in Mountain Lion
nuladog is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2012, 10:53 PM   #10
JAT
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mpls, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcusj0015 View Post
RAW means everything from the Image Sensor is saved, and it's completely lossless, Jpg is for lulzy tards, Raw is the future.
If only the world weren't going in the opposite direction.

Apple still doesn't care about Sigma users. Shock.
__________________
-- Spiky
JAT is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2012, 11:49 PM   #11
G51989
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
This is so silly.

Who uses digital cameras?
G51989 is offline   -2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2012, 12:27 AM   #12
ebm
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
It is no good idea to install those updates for the dedicated camera only as
a) most pro users do not plugin the camera directly but use card readers
b) pro users often work in the fields without internet access and it can be nerv wracking to be in the pusta without beeing able to install anything.
c) full automatic updates sometimes may fail.

BTW. wo said raw is the future did not get the point of RAW vs JPEG. Just in film times nobody showed his friends the negative films but the photos on paper.
ebm is offline   -1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2012, 02:29 AM   #13
till213
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by guzhogi View Post
Add upon that what they do for printer drivers, when one is connected, detect what kind it is & download the appropriate software. This way, you don't get the software for boatloads of other cameras.
You're totally holding it wrong(tm): it is not just when you connect a physical camera that you want to be able to open and display the Foo format. It is also when you get that file by any means (download, USB stick, ...) and want to display by any application.

So assuming that you get a RAW image format, with some magic byte file header (your OS doesn't know anything about it yet) and some random extension *.foo.

Now your OS could ask you each time it discovers such a file format it doesn't know nothing about it - and in fact, OS X does just that, too! - e.g. by looking up *.foo in some global database and offering you the appropriate app in the App Store. And/or recognise in some magic way that *.foo is in fact an image format and that you're better off with the appropriate image IO plugin (such that any Cocoa application is able to open that file!) instead.

Or you just get a bunch of common RAW format plugins once in a while and be done with that. Don't get bothered each time you try to open a *.bmp ("I don't know about this image format yet, but there is an image plugin available. Do you want me to download it?"), *.tiff ("I don't know about this image format yet, ..."), *.jpg ("I don't know..."), *.pef ("... do you really want me to...") or *.dmg ("... Really, I could just download the appropriate plugin just now...!").


Or do you really care how many USB device drivers are lingering on your OS X installation which are likely to never be used by any hardware, because you simply don't own such a device, and never will? Ever wondered why OS installations are counted in Gigabytes (YES, that's 1024 MEGAbytes!) these days? I remember times when an OS was delivered on 2-3 floppy disks (those had capacities counted in KILObytes...). Oh and yes, almost every device required you to install the device driver yourself by hand...

Well, yes, one could care about waste of disk space - but do we really care? We just became to lazy and expect an OS to immediatelly recognise and support the connected device - or open the given camera file "out of the box".

Cheers

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by lars666 View Post
Can't get enough of these sexy RAW updates, especially as I have never owned a digital camera ...
Ever wondered how many other device drivers are burried in your OS X installation, for devices that you'll never be a proud owner of?

Besides, image plugins don't require you to actually own a camera of that format! There are other situations where one might want to display/edit such a RAW image - well, maybe not you personally anyway...
till213 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2012, 02:51 AM   #14
lars666
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by till213 View Post
Ever wondered how many other device drivers are burried in your OS X installation, for devices that you'll never be a proud owner of?
That's totally cool with me as - in comparison to these RAW things - I don't get an "there are software updates" notification every week or so for them. There are worse things, for sure, but if Apple could manage to solve this differently than pushing me an update only for RAW compatibility that often, it would be nice. But to be honest, I am only disappointed about the RAW updates because every time I see that there is a software update, I get exited that this maybe is a new OS X point version, iTunes update etc. These RAW updates which are totally useless for me always let me down...

Last edited by lars666; Jun 27, 2012 at 02:56 AM.
lars666 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2012, 03:06 AM   #15
till213
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by lars666 View Post
That's totally cool with me as - in comparison to these RAW things - I don't get an "there are software updates" notification every week or so for them.
C'mon, it's not that often (usually - but I agree, recently there were quite some RAW updates)

And at least printer drivers also do get an update once in a while - and I hear Thunderbolt drivers, too

UPDATE: I am not sure, but IIRC I once got Epson driver updates (on 10.6.x) - even though I don't own an Epson, and for sure never connected one. For Thunderbolt off course you only get updates if you have that hardware, sure...

Quote:
Originally Posted by lars666 View Post
There are worse things, for sure, but if Apple could manage to solve this differently than pushing me an update only for RAW compatibility that often, it would be nice.
OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion is supposed to handle updates "silently behind the curtain" - as has been mentioned already.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lars666 View Post
But to be honest, I am only disappointed about the RAW updates because every time I see that there is a software update, I get exited that this maybe is a new OS X point version, iTunes update etc. These RAW updates which are totally useless for me always let me down...
Me too, I get excited about RAW updates - only to realise moments later that my Pentax K-5 RAW (*.pef) format is already supported since the camera came out last year or so - so nothing to gain for me either
till213 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2012, 08:17 AM   #16
Boston007
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by G51989 View Post
This is so silly.

Who uses digital cameras?
Photographers
__________________
MacPro 3,1 2-2.8GHz Quad-Core/10GB; iPad Air WiFi+4G 32GB; iPhone 5S 32GB; iPod Shuffle 1GB (2nd Generation)
Boston007 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2012, 12:34 PM   #17
Digitalclips
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by zin View Post
There must be a better way to deliver these compatibility updates.

Why don't they implement dynamic updating capabilities (i.e. maintaining a constant connection to the update server for these updates, so the user doesn't have to concern themselves with manually installing, and they install automatically when iPhoto/Aperture is re-launched)?
Given you only need the one for your own camera in most cases I don't see why you would want that? Best to add to ignore list once you have the one for your own camera.
Digitalclips is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2012, 11:19 PM   #18
macuser1232
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Nikon D3200 > Canon T4i
macuser1232 is offline   -1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2012, 08:57 PM   #19
MacGurl111
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by macuser1232 View Post
Nikon D3200 > Canon T4i
Canon T4i is my preference. Husband prefers the Nikon and giving me reasons why we should get the Nikon!
__________________
The reason we struggle with insecurity is because we compare our behind-the-scenes with everyone else's highlight reel. -Steve Furtick
MacGurl111 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 3, 2012, 12:16 PM   #20
JAT
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mpls, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebm View Post
It is no good idea to install those updates for the dedicated camera only as
a) most pro users do not plugin the camera directly but use card readers
RAW updates are not about camera syncing. They are basically file format issues, so it doesn't matter how the photo file gets to your computer, it still needs compatibility.
__________________
-- Spiky
JAT is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 20, 2012, 01:41 AM   #21
simsaladimbamba
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: located
Sorry for the revival, but how does one get that update without having iPhoto 9 or Aperture installed? I use Lightroom, and it can work with them okay, but sometimes I use Finder to browse some .cr2 files and cannot get QuickLook to look at them, because I have no drivers for the 650D installed, the ones, that come with that 3.14 update, which I cannot install because I do not have iPhoto or Aperture. Is there a workaround, or should I download a torrented copy of one of those two applications just so I can install a driver?

Apple, what the frell?
simsaladimbamba is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > Mac Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Releases iTunes 11.1.5 With Bug Fixes, Compatibility Improvements MacRumors Mac Blog Discussion 61 Mar 13, 2014 12:46 PM
Apple Releases Major Final Cut Pro X Update with Dual Viewers, Multichannel Audio Tools, RED Camera Support and More MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 177 Jan 16, 2014 07:18 AM
Apple RAW Update 4.05 YodaATmac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion 9 Jun 2, 2013 10:48 AM
Apple Releases 5.1 Update for 2nd and 3rd Generation Apple TV MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 300 Oct 26, 2012 09:41 PM
Apple Releases 5.0.2 Update for 2nd and 3rd Generation Apple TV MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 62 Jun 10, 2012 07:19 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC