http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolo...h-Court-defeat-over-prize-iPhone-patents.html
Apple suffers High Court defeat over 'prize' iPhone patents
Apple suffers High Court defeat over 'prize' iPhone patents
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolo...h-Court-defeat-over-prize-iPhone-patents.html
Apple suffers High Court defeat over 'prize' iPhone patents
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolo...h-Court-defeat-over-prize-iPhone-patents.html
Apple suffers High Court defeat over 'prize' iPhone patents
Is this a good thing?
Think of the unlock screen options that exist in the android world now because no one wanted to risk a patent issue over slide to unlock.
Think of the HTC One X, GNEX, and GS3 unlock. All different, and all useful in their own way. Would you rather have options or go back to slide to unlock?
This is what happens when you force companies to not imitate the competition, patent or not.
I respectfully disagree. The Android world already had other lock screens, and the other lock screens such as face unlock, face unlock with voice, motion unlock, etc were not the result of them being afraid to use slide to unlock. It is more a function of inevitable innovation. In the Android world, manufacturers can't afford to sit still for long. They must constantly innovate or they will be passed by the competition. I think the various lock screens are more of a function of them trying to compete.
Officially, android was slide to unlock until late last year and GNEX/ICS
On the Gingerbread side, there was not a lot of diversity in screen unlocking until the Sensation and GS2, and both came after Apple started smacking people over patent infringement.
I think it was forced evolution in this case.
But even with the Sensation, it was still a slide to unlock gesture, they just added app shortcuts to it. It still was the same concept though. They added that more so to differentiate themselves from other OEM's.
But the Sensation had an omni directional slide to unlock. I think that would be distinction enough to stand up to a legal challenge if the Apple patent was found valid.
Is this a good thing?
Think of the unlock screen options that exist in the android world now because no one wanted to risk a patent issue over slide to unlock.
Think of the HTC One X, GNEX, and GS3 unlock. All different, and all useful in their own way. Would you rather have options or go back to slide to unlock?
This is what happens when you force companies to not imitate the competition, patent or not.
I fully believe in protecting your IP however the USPTO is rubber stamping way too many patents and has been doing so for far too long. We need a major overhaul of the USPTO now.
I also agree with Judge Posner, we do not nor should we be granting patents for software. For example I can click a URL or highlight a phone number, etc on my computer which is one of the patents Apple is fighting over. To me it is an obvious feature that would have come about naturally. For ANY company to try and stifle innovation and competition over that is ludicrous.
Apple does make great products but lately it seems to me they are more afraid of the competition than they are of innovation.
If given the choice of an device A (any other OS based device) or an Apple device and both did similar or nearly identical things which would you choose? Next are you going to confuse a Galaxy Tab with an iPad with one saying Samsung on the front and one saying nothing?
Apple users buy Apple for a reason, and don't buy another brand for the same reason. Its Apple and the other isn't.