|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#76 |
|
I sooooo can't wait for the iPad Nano! Oh wait, that's an iPod Touch? never mind.
|
|
|
|
-2
|
|
|
#77 |
|
I love my Kobo Reader, but I would change it to this mini-iPad in a heartbeat. It's all I wanted for reating at the metro.
__________________
Minecraft Server Blog: www.canadiaserver.com | Minecraft Server IP: mc.canadiaserver.com |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
[QUOTE=Richdmoore;15201544]
Quote:
|
||
|
|
-1
|
|
|
#79 |
|
__________________
Think Different-ly! The President campaigned against Congress. D Sen is led by D Sen ML Reid and D VP and Sen Pres Biden, under orders of D Pres Obama. http://www.gop.gov/indepth/jobs/tracker |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#80 |
|
It's the ecosystem stupid
I think people lose sight of the fact that Apple makes 33% from all content sold from their App/iTunes stores.
They are on a quest to make the iPad the defacto tablet standard for the entire planet, getting it in the hands of all the people of the world. Driving the price point down further is essential to making that happen, since not all economies are equal. Not only is this consistent with Steve Jobs' vision of making information accessible to everyone, but that 33% cut of all content is a huge long-term profit center for Apple Inc. The mini will happen! |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Nopes
I really don't see this happening. I find it hard to believe that the 7in tablet market is that much of a threat to Apple that they feel the need to add yet another device between the iPod Touch and the iPad.
The Kindle Fire was only selling for a short period of time and that was only because they released it around Christmas. Even I got one for Christmas; it was on eBay shortly there after. I would be very surprised if Apple decided to do this, mainly because it would cut into sales of there flagship tablet that has made them a household name. |
|
|
|
-3
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
Quote:
The country is already the fourth largest market in the world for cars, the sixth for cell phones and the seventh in Internet usage, not to mention that it's the place with the highest C-level salaries in the world. The only reason Apple devices do not sell MORE over there is because of taxes, which normally more than double the price of such devices (as well as the prices of telecom services, which suffer from at least 40% taxation). If prices in Brazil were the same as in the US, Brazilians would probably have more disposable income to buy more iPads than virtually any other country nowadays. And just to remind people again: only a handful of people live in the remote Amazon, OK? The US equivalent of that would be Alaska.
__________________
iMac 27" Core i7 3.4GHz, 16GB RAM, 2GB GPU, 120GB SSD+4TB HD, Bowers & Wilkins 685, Nuforce HDP, OS X 10.8.3; iPad 3 Wi-Fi+4G 64GB; iPhone 5 White 32GB. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#83 | ||
|
Quote:
I think this whole women’s purse size logistics is a non-issue. If you’re planning on taking a tablet with you, it’s a simple planning move to take the right bag. My wife is about as fashionable as a woman as you’ll ever meet and it’s never been an issue with her. ![]() She says my iPad is large, but if she works at it, it’s eventually fits... Quote:
|
|||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#84 | |
|
Quote:
While the economy is growing, it's not how you describe it. Cars sold have increased due to government incentives, not because of increased wages. You're right about the import taxes. The cost of electronics here is 3x that of The States due to that. I had thought that Foxconn building out iphone manufacturing in Brazil would normalize the prices, but it did not. People do like the Apple products here, and they are more accessible then ever before. Those with the money do stretch to buy them. However, the price has to drop for them to be house hold items, and that is Apples goal. |
||
|
|
3
|
|
|
#85 |
|
I have to say I really don't see why they'd want to make a smaller device; at 7.85" it's still going to be too big to really use as a phone, so it's not like it'd be a hybrid device, but at that size it's going to be a lot less usable than the current iPad.
I think that Apple's time is better spent on making the iPad thinner and lighter, as 7.85" isn't really anymore portable as you'd still need to put in a bag anyway, unless they're aiming for the cargo-trouser wearing market?
__________________
"Early 2008" MacPro, 2 x 3.2ghz Quad-Core Xeons, 10gb DDR2 800mhz ECC RAM, 120gb Solid State Drive (Mac & Windows OS), 4 x 750gb hard-drives (striped, users/files), NVidia GeForce 8800GT (512mb). |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#86 |
|
"Let's keep re-using the same exact photo every-time Joe-Smoe guarantees a smaller iPad is on the way!"
__________________
Society needs more blunt statements and less sugar coating. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
Quote:
http://www.appolicious.com/finance/a...revenue-for-q2 "Apple also revealed that iTunes itself dragged in some $1.9 billion in revenue in just the second quarter of 2012. The store sells apps for iOS, as well as music, movies, podcasts and e-books, all of which contributed to the giant take. Apple receives a 30 percent cut of revenue generated by content sold through iTunes, which means that app developers and content makers shared some $1.33 billion in revenue from the digital portal. The leftover $570 million, Apple said, went to iTunes operational costs." |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
Quote:
I was concerned this would happen. |
||
|
|
-4
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Sure...
Oh yeah, and these rumors have only been going on since the original iPad came out. People already think the 10 inch iPad is "just an oversized iPod Touch" can't wait to hear what they say about this- "the oversized, mini iPod Touch".
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#90 |
|
|
2
|
|
|
#91 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#92 |
|
If you want to draw a parallel to the laptop world, the 7.85" iPad is only more likely. Apple first ridiculed netbooks and then released a first-class 11" laptop.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#93 |
|
OH MY GOSH APPLE FRAGMENTATION *looks up at sky*
Oh, the world's not ending.
__________________
iPhone 5 | Silver-White | 64gb | AT&T iPad 3 | White | 64gb | Verizon | Retina MacBook Pro | 2.6ghz | 16gb RAM | 256gb | |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Environmentalist !
This story: Best recycling ever.
__________________
Mac Pro 2.93 GHz 12-core w/ ATI Radeon HD 5870 1024 MB; MBP 15"- 2.5GHz; MacBook; iPhone 4S; 64 GB iPad (3rd Gen) with w AT&T; iPod classic; Shuffle (2nd and 3rd Gens) |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#95 |
|
this rumour needs to die
its not real. Stop pretending it is. ARN must be all "hey no rumors today... lets toss up an 7 inch iPad one as filler"
__________________
I miss using this login. 2010 27 inch iMac, iPad2 16gb, dual i7 11 inch Macbook Air. iPad mini 32GB with LTE. next on list 2 more iPads. |
|
|
|
-1
|
|
|
#96 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#97 |
|
I think it has two big selling points, portability and price.
As great as the iPad is, it's not convenient to lug around. (My wife would love to be able to toss it in her purse.) And price is big as well. At $500-$629 for an entry level device, I would bet most families only have 1 iPad the family fights over. Or at best a hand me down when a 2 or 3 was purchased. But at $250-$299, people would be MUCH more inclined to buy a second (or third device). |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#98 |
|
is it going to have retina?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#99 |
|
|
1
|
|
|
#100 |
|
|
1
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 AM.









iPhone 5 | Silver-White | 64gb | AT&T

Linear Mode
