|Jul 21, 2012, 06:30 PM||#1|
Is the iPod nano, iPod shuffle and the iPod Classic dead?
I think we can all agree that the best iPod is the iPod touch. But why have the iPod nano, shuffle and Classic? The iPod touch can do everything the others can. I don't see the purpose.
|Jul 21, 2012, 07:04 PM||#2|
such a stupid post; please no one feed the troll and let this thread die...
☻ "A dream you dream alone is only a dream...
... A dream you dream together is reality." ☻
|Jul 22, 2012, 02:55 AM||#3|
Feeding the troll anyways...
The iPod classic will be there until SSD's can be had for cheaper, enabling Apple to sell the iPod Touch with 256GB of memory for the same price or cheaper than the Classic. That day is not far off.
The shuffle is still there as a low cost alternative for people who just don't want a touch, or people who like a small unit for a workout, which is what the nano's purpose also serves.
Just the other day, I was swimming laps in the pool, and the swimmer next to me had a waterproofed iPod shuffle. That's not really possible yet with the other iPods, not to mention the unit's small size.
15" Late '11 2.5GHz MacBook Pro, Mac Mini Server 2.6GHz , Thunderbolt Display x2, iPod Classic 120GB, iPhone 4S 64GB, Lenovo ThinkPad X240
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|iPod Nano or iPod Classic?||jmebbk||iPod||18||Dec 3, 2013 10:34 PM|
|Apple Splitting iPod Touch Lineup Between Current and New Designs, Increasing Color Options for iPod Shuffle and New Nano?||MacRumors||MacRumors.com News Discussion||181||Sep 11, 2012 09:07 AM|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 PM.