Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Pro

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 8, 2012, 12:29 PM   #1
lloyd709
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Why no Thunderbolt to USB 3 hub/converter

The only device I can see on the market that will give you this is using the Sonnet Tempo Thunderbolt to ExpressCard adaptor and then use a USB 3.0 ExpressCard. This at least proves that it must be technically possible. If I use one of these though I won't be able to connect to a screen at the same time - unless I'm missing something.

Is there sort of technical problem with Thunderbolt tripping company's up on this. I've been waiting for about a year for someone to bring something to market and no one has. A couple of companies have been sporting pictures of thunderbolt docks for many months now but nothing tangible has come from them.

What's the problem? There must be problem because there must be a massive market just waiting for one of these.
lloyd709 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2012, 12:31 PM   #2
geoffreak
macrumors 68020
 
geoffreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas; Wish I was in Japan
Belkin's thunderbolt dock is coming soon and offers USB 3.0 support.
__________________
rMBP 2.6GHz 16GB 512GB | Mac Mini 2009 2.26GHz | MBP Early '08 2.4GHz | iPhone 4S 32GB | Drobo
Nimbix - Accelerated Cloud Supercomputing
geoffreak is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2012, 01:35 PM   #3
g4cube
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
I think the problem is simple.

I think people are willing to spend no more than $19 or $29 for such an adapter of hub.

Apple has done so for Ethernet and for FireWire. Perhaps they might do one for USB 3.0. they certainly have the capability.

With component costs being what they are, I don't think there are any companies other than Apple who would or could build such a product. There simply is not enough margin to do so.

For example, from the various take-apart videos and pictures available of the Ethernet to Thunderbolt dongle, it is clear that it is a complex project. Few other than Apple have the ability to make something similar at low cost, or are able to subsidize the product.
g4cube is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2012, 01:38 PM   #4
AZREOSpecialist
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by lloyd709 View Post
The only device I can see on the market that will give you this is using the Sonnet Tempo Thunderbolt to ExpressCard adaptor and then use a USB 3.0 ExpressCard. This at least proves that it must be technically possible. If I use one of these though I won't be able to connect to a screen at the same time - unless I'm missing something.

Is there sort of technical problem with Thunderbolt tripping company's up on this. I've been waiting for about a year for someone to bring something to market and no one has. A couple of companies have been sporting pictures of thunderbolt docks for many months now but nothing tangible has come from them.

What's the problem? There must be problem because there must be a massive market just waiting for one of these.
Why would you want a USB3 hub via Thunderbolt when today's MacBook Pros have several USB3 ports - to any of which you can attach a hub?
__________________
2009 Mac Pro Quad Xeon W3580 @ 3.3 GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB RAID 5/RocketRAID 4320, Corsair P256 SSD Boot Drive, EVGA GTX-285
2012 MacBook Pro Retina 2.6 GHz, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD
AZREOSpecialist is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2012, 02:17 PM   #5
asdad123
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZREOSpecialist View Post
Why would you want a USB3 hub via Thunderbolt when today's MacBook Pros have several USB3 ports - to any of which you can attach a hub?
I would really appreciate one for my TB display (just an adapter, not a dock. I only have one USB 3.0 HDD)
__________________
RMBP 2.6 GHz, 8gb RAM, 512gb SSD w/ iCarbons Black Carbon Fiber
asdad123 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2012, 02:40 PM   #6
lloyd709
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZREOSpecialist View Post
Why would you want a USB3 hub via Thunderbolt when today's MacBook Pros have several USB3 ports - to any of which you can attach a hub?
For one reason not everyone has a new macbook pro or want's to buy one!!

For a second reason - not wanting to start another topic - some people still have software that only runs on Rosetta - and hence tied into Snowleopard (that can't run on USB3 equipped MacBook pros!!
lloyd709 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2012, 03:34 PM   #7
dusk007
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
The problem is easily explained.

As you said yourself it requires an PCIe USB3 card.
A hub wouldn't be much different.
You need a USB controller cheap no problem.
You need a thunderbolt controller not cheap at all.
You need a quite complicated set up so those work together.

The Apple TV has a logicboard inside that competes with any Apple TV to deliver those functions. The one in the Seagate goflex takes the area of an HDD. Look at thunderbolt devices. Compare that to USB devices that fit on a fingernail.
They have quite expensive logicboards in there with not so cheap chips on them. Making a Thunderbolt to USB 3 hub is possible but not worth it. Just too expensive and very few people are willing to pay for it.
Most people today have USB 3 and would rather get a USB hub for a tenth of the price.
Doing anything with Thunderbolt is only worth it if the device is expensive. Like a full blown dock that offers a lot more than just USB ports.
Or a display that costs 1000 bucks anyway.
Or an expensive raid nas drive.

All the external Thunderbolt HDDs that exist charge about 100$ for the Thunderbolt in it. That is about what you could expect as a price for a such a hub.
Especially if all you want is to connect the one external HDD you own to a fast port you won't pay for a hub that costs more than your external drive. It is more likely people use Gbit LAN or suffer USB 2 until they get a new notebook.

Thunderbolt is a bad product because it is just too expensive for all the small stuff as in single devices and this won't change anytime soon. That is what we have cheap USB 3 for. USB requires little space, small controllers and almost no money.
It sucks that the 2011 MBP didn't have USB3 which is why wouldn't have bought one.

I think the best option is Displays that come with thunderbolt support. Asus is launching one and others will follow. A decent external display you might need anyway and the added thunderbolt costs shouldn't be too bad. You get USB 3.0 on the display.
I don't know what it costs but it will probably be cheaper than the Apple one but also not as cheap as comparable alternatives.
dusk007 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2012, 03:54 PM   #8
urkel
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZREOSpecialist View Post
Why would you want a USB3 hub via Thunderbolt when today's MacBook Pros have several USB3 ports - to any of which you can attach a hub?
Not everyone has "today's MacBook Pro".
urkel is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2012, 04:41 PM   #9
ZipZap
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
A thunderbolt hub that offers USB 3 is certainly possible for any generation Mac with a thunderbolt jack.

The beauty of the hub...less or no dongles.

I want just one wire leaving my rMBP...have 4 right now.

Apple should offer one as they already have it...just need to put it in a simpler box.
ZipZap is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2012, 05:58 PM   #10
ThePreditor
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZREOSpecialist View Post
Why would you want a USB3 hub via Thunderbolt when today's MacBook Pros have several USB3 ports - to any of which you can attach a hub?
Because I like my 17" MacBook Pro. But clients give me USB 3 drives sometimes. A thunderbolt to USB 3 adapter would be quite useful.
ThePreditor is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2012, 06:16 PM   #11
beamer8912
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: May 2009
That's an interesting conundrum. Thunderbolt but no USB 3.0. I can see how an adapter would be appreciated, but it's a bit of a niche market since there are only a couple years of thunderbolt but no USB 3.0.

I wouldn't expect apple to make one since they're really pushing TB. I really think they want all other ports to disappear leaving just two TB ports necessary to run all your equipment.
beamer8912 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2012, 07:20 PM   #12
g4cube
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePreditor View Post
Because I like my 17" MacBook Pro. But clients give me USB 3 drives sometimes. A thunderbolt to USB 3 adapter would be quite useful.
You do know that a USB 3.0 drive will work fine in a USB 2.0 port, right?

It will just be slower, but still functional.

There are also ExpressCard USB 3.0 adapters for the lone slot on your 17" Macbook Pro, and I believe the CalDigit, LaCie, or Sonnet drivers, too.
g4cube is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 10:46 AM   #13
ThePreditor
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by g4cube View Post
You do know that a USB 3.0 drive will work fine in a USB 2.0 port, right?

It will just be slower, but still functional.
Right, but speed is the issue here, so USB 2.0 is next to useless for me when transferring 500GB worth of footage in a timely manner.
ThePreditor is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 11:46 AM   #14
importraverxx
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
firewire 800? i have a 15" late 2011 too and its perfectly fine. I use fcp x daily on it. Get a G-Drive and you good to go. Or if you wanna swap drive then get a firewire 800 enclosure, its like 30 bucks.
importraverxx is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 12:20 PM   #15
pgiguere1
macrumors 68000
 
pgiguere1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
The price of Thunderbolt controllers is so high that a company would have to price such an adapter at a higher price than what most customers are willing to pay. They know they wouldn't sell much, so the lack of economy of scale would make it even more expensive.

We were in the same situation with FireWire not too long ago. We would have needed a Sonnet Tempo + FireWire ExpressCard + Thunderbolt cable which sums up to around 300$.

Apple decided to make Thunderbolt to FireWire / Ethernet adapters just to sell more rMBPs. I doubt the adapters themselves are profitable at all, when you see just a Thunderbolt cable is 49$ and iFixit claims the price is justified by all the active components it has. Even 3rd party Thunderbolt cables are almost as expensive.

Apple just made sure you can buy a rMBP even if you need Ethernet or FireWire, but they probably don't care about those who won't buy a new computer and just need adapters. All new MacBooks have USB3, so a Thunderbolt to USB3 adapter would only benefit users who own older Macs.

If the adapter had to be priced at 29$ and wouldn't be profitable, Apple would have no interest in investing time into making it unless it would encourage people to buy new Macs, which it wouldn't. It would have to be profitable by itself to justify investing time in making it.

Now the question is: Would you buy a $99 Thunderbolt to USB3 adapter? Apple and other companies predicted the answer would be no for pretty much everybody, so that's why such an adapter doesn't exist.

Now of course Thunderbolt controllers become cheaper with time and Thunderbolt will be coming to PCs so there's still hope in the future.
pgiguere1 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 12:21 PM   #16
dukebound85
macrumors P6
 
dukebound85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 5045 feet above sea level
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZREOSpecialist View Post
Why would you want a USB3 hub via Thunderbolt when today's MacBook Pros have several USB3 ports - to any of which you can attach a hub?
because there are macs with TB but not usb3...

not everyone has the latest
dukebound85 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2013, 06:00 AM   #17
lugesm
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Any UPDATES on this ? ? ?

Corning has announced 100M Thunderbolt cables, and Apple has introduced a 0.5M Thunderbolt cable and several adapters for Thunderbolt to xxx.

But, I still cannot find an offering by anyone for a Thunderbolt to USB-3 hub . . . unless you consider the highly expensive Belkin docking station. At $400 that's just plain foolish.
lugesm is online now   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2013, 06:12 AM   #18
Ploki
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by lugesm View Post
Corning has announced 100M Thunderbolt cables, and Apple has introduced a 0.5M Thunderbolt cable and several adapters for Thunderbolt to xxx.

But, I still cannot find an offering by anyone for a Thunderbolt to USB-3 hub . . . unless you consider the highly expensive Belkin docking station. At $400 that's just plain foolish.
It's 299$ now, and its supposed to be out in a few weeks I believe.

And I think OWC is rumored to sell one...

but everything is vaporware for now. :/
Ploki is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2013, 08:37 AM   #19
lugesm
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ploki View Post
It's 299$ now, and its supposed to be out in a few weeks I believe.

And I think OWC is rumored to sell one...

but everything is vaporware for now. :/
Thanks for the update. Still a pretty steep price, but it looks like a very useful product.
lugesm is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 01:21 PM   #20
biallystock
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ploki View Post
It's 299$ now, and its supposed to be out in a few weeks I believe.

And I think OWC is rumored to sell one...

but everything is vaporware for now. :/
Still says $399! and just to connect a $79 drive!

Even if you could get it. The Belkin Thunderbolt hub has been on pre-order for over 8 months now. Should be out in time for the Thunderbolt farewell party.

Only in Appleland does this pretend to make sense.
biallystock is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 01:53 PM   #21
Ploki
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by biallystock View Post
Still says $399! and just to connect a $79 drive!

Even if you could get it. The Belkin Thunderbolt hub has been on pre-order for over 8 months now. Should be out in time for the Thunderbolt farewell party.

Only in Appleland does this pretend to make sense.
http://www.macrumors.com/2013/01/07/...e-back-to-299/
Ploki is online now   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Pro

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using rMBP as USB 3 Hub over Thunderbolt for iMac 2011? angusmcfisher iMac 4 Apr 9, 2014 02:49 PM
Caldigit Thunderbolt hub and Lacie ESATA hub mjsanders5uk Mac Peripherals 0 Dec 10, 2013 08:56 AM
USB 2 hub or USB 3 HUB for charging? MiniD3 Mac Peripherals 7 Nov 28, 2013 09:12 AM
Thunderbolt Splitter or Thunderbolt Hub AntonWebern MacBook Pro 11 Jul 25, 2013 01:05 AM
Thunderbolt Splitter or Thunderbolt Hub AntonWebern Community Discussion 1 Oct 12, 2012 09:18 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC