Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Spacedust

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
May 24, 2009
999
160
I know that 96 GB was supported in Lion. How about Mountain Lion ?
 

papoopeepoo

macrumors member
Jul 2, 2011
69
7
Philadelphia
I remember reading somewhere that ML was tested to support 128gb, but only shows 96gb in about this mac and the like. In activity monitor, though, 128gb showed up and was accessible.

Others will chime in.
 

wallysb01

macrumors 68000
Jun 30, 2011
1,589
809
I remember reading somewhere that ML was tested to support 128gb, but only shows 96gb in about this mac and the like. In activity monitor, though, 128gb showed up and was accessible.

Others will chime in.

In my test it was almost the opposite. In about this Mac 128 GB shows up, but in activity monitor only 96 is reported. Then when I ran a program that I knew would try to use 128, it could not. I suppose activity monitor may not be reporting usage above 96 GB, but what else can you do?
 

papoopeepoo

macrumors member
Jul 2, 2011
69
7
Philadelphia
In my test it was almost the opposite. In about this Mac 128 GB shows up, but in activity monitor only 96 is reported. Then when I ran a program that I knew would try to use 128, it could not. I suppose activity monitor may not be reporting usage above 96 GB, but what else can you do?

Got it now, thanks.
 

Spacedust

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
May 24, 2009
999
160
Thank you. I just wanted to know ;)

Windows Vista Business/Ultimate supports up to 128 GB RAM
Windows 7 Professional/Ultimate supports up to 192 GB RAM
Windows 8 consumer preview supports up to 512 GB RAM :)
 

Umbongo

macrumors 601
Sep 14, 2006
4,934
55
England
Then why would OWC be selling 128 GB for the Mac Pro if the excess above 96 is not usable? http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/Mac-Pro-Memory Give them a call.

Says right below: **Current Mac OS X versions are unable to utilize more then 96GB RAM due to an operating system limitation. 128GB can be fully utilized by a 2009-2010 Mac Pro if running Bootcamp with 64-bit versions of Windows XP and later as well as with 64-bit versions of Linux.
 

velocityg4

macrumors 604
Dec 19, 2004
7,329
4,717
Georgia
Thank you. I just wanted to know ;)

Windows Vista Business/Ultimate supports up to 128 GB RAM
Windows 7 Professional/Ultimate supports up to 192 GB RAM
Windows 8 consumer preview supports up to 512 GB RAM :)

That's interesting. I wonder why they just din't set the limit at 999 Exabytes or some other ridiculous amount and avoid issues? It's not like they are unaware that capabilities of hardware increase all the time.
 

Umbongo

macrumors 601
Sep 14, 2006
4,934
55
England
That's interesting. I wonder why they just din't set the limit at 999 Exabytes or some other ridiculous amount and avoid issues? It's not like they are unaware that capabilities of hardware increase all the time.

Because they can't properly test it and develop around it.
 

mackid1993

macrumors member
Aug 16, 2009
84
0
The amount of RAM that the OS can support is irrelevant at this point. The concern is really what one's logic board can support.
 

FluJunkie

macrumors 6502a
Jul 17, 2007
618
1
The amount of RAM that the OS can support is irrelevant at this point. The concern is really what one's logic board can support.

Except this is patently not true on a Mac Pro, where running Windows 64-bit or Linux you can get access to 128 GB of RAM, but OS X will top out at 96.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.