|Sep 12, 2012, 08:19 PM||#3|
For what purpose?
I guess it would have been a bit better for video. The biggest difference I see with retina on iPhones and iPads is how text is rendered. I don't think anyone is going to be doing a lot of reading on their nano.
|Sep 12, 2012, 10:29 PM||#4|
Again, not a big deal, many might not care, but I'd imagine loss in battery life/increase in cost would be so minimal I'm surprised Apple didn't just do it.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|iPod Touch 4th Gen Retina vs. iPhone Retina Display, Are they different?||falconman515||iPod touch||15||Oct 29, 2014 11:21 AM|
|ipod nano first gen recall (trade up for new nano)?||RidgeRacerType4||iPod||4||Oct 7, 2012 12:09 AM|
|iPod Nano Retina||Hexiii||iPod||21||Jul 26, 2012 06:35 AM|
|Is the iPod nano, iPod shuffle and the iPod Classic dead?||Retina MacBook||iPod||3||Jul 22, 2012 03:36 AM|
|iPad mini similar to the "fat" nano? (3rd gen iPod nano)||leukotriene||iPad||2||Jul 7, 2012 11:44 AM|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 PM.