Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:13 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Camera+ Comes to the iPad with iCloud Sync Support






Camera+, the top-selling non-game app for the iPhone, has made its way to the iPad.

The app, which has sold more than 9 million copies, is a full-featured replacement for the standard Camera app that comes with the iPhone. It includes a plethora of options for editing and sharing pictures, as well as a variety of different shooting modes.

The new version of Camera+ adds support for iCloud, as well as the new iPad app that will sync photos between the iPhone and iPad versions of the app to make editing easier.
Quote:
Together, the iPad and iPhone apps should pose a challenge to Adobe, which offers a suite of Photoshop apps for editing photos on the iPad, as well as its own cloud storage service.

Like the iPhone version, the iPad app was designed to make editing photos quick and easy. It has five basic tools: Scenes for applying automatic touch-ups for photos taken in certain light conditions, like in low light or indoor areas; Adjust for making basic adjustments like rotating the image or removing red eye; Crops for cropping portions of a photo; FX Effects for applying fancy filters; and Borders for adding stylized borders.



The New York Times spoke with the developers behind Camera+, hearing how difficult it was to make iCloud work the way they wanted it to. They said Apple's iCloud API's were inadequate and that it took their developers "twice as long as it should because of the problems with it."

Regardless of the difficulties in developing it, Camera+ is now available on the both the iPhone and iPad for $0.99 each. [Direct Links: iPhone, iPad]

Article Link: Camera+ Comes to the iPad with iCloud Sync Support
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:18 PM   #2
kirky29
macrumors 65816
 
kirky29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincolnshire, England
Send a message via Yahoo to kirky29 Send a message via Skype™ to kirky29
Ahh it's a separate app for the iPad...this explains a lot

Been waiting a long time for this!
__________________
27" iMac, 15" MacBook Pro 2.2GHz i7 2011, iPhone 5 16GB - iPad 1/2/3/Mini - 24" Cinema Display,
Apple Magic Mouse, Trackpad, Time Machine, Apple TV,
| Check out my flickr |
kirky29 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:30 PM   #3
dwman
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: DC
Not to sound like a troll, but do folks really take a lot of pictures with the iPad? I have an iPad 2 and the camera on the back is lousy.
__________________
2007 MBP 2.2 SR, 5.5G 30 GB iPod, 2ndG 4GB iPod Nano, 64 GB iPhone 6, 16GB iPad 2 3G
dwman is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:31 PM   #4
Staindsoul
macrumors Demi-God
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwman View Post
Not to sound like a troll, but do folks really take a lot of pictures with the iPad? I have an iPad 2 and the camera on the back is lousy.
I think it's mainly for taking pics with your iPhone and then being able to edit them on the iPad. Am I missing something?
Staindsoul is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:32 PM   #5
Sneakz
macrumors 65816
 
Sneakz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwman View Post
Not to sound like a troll, but do folks really take a lot of pictures with the iPad? I have an iPad 2 and the camera on the back is lousy.
The third gen iPad takes pictures comparable to the iPhone 4 or maybe even slightly better.
Sneakz is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:35 PM   #6
tcb9289
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
I posed this question in another thread, but I feel like I might get an answer more quickly here . . .

With the recent update, I'm thinking of using camera+ as my primary camera app on iPhone 5 . . .can anyone who has made the switch previously comment on the benefits/drawbacks of one versus the other. Is there any loss of quality or functionality in taking photos directly from camera+?

I've used camera+ primarily as an editing tool, but it seems to launch faster than the stock app on the 5, so I'm considering it as my go-to camera.
tcb9289 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:39 PM   #7
somethingelsefl
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Apple REALLY needs to streamline their iCloud API, especially since much of so much of their future depends on developers integrating iCloud
somethingelsefl is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:41 PM   #8
Tinmania
macrumors 68030
 
Tinmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Aridzona
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwman View Post
Not to sound like a troll, but do folks really take a lot of pictures with the iPad? I have an iPad 2 and the camera on the back is lousy.
The iPad 3's is much better.

However, with iCloud support for Camera+ and PhotoStream you don't ever need to take the pics with the iPad itself. I would just use my iPhone.

Camera+ is also a nice little editor. It's not just for taking pics. Editing, for me, is nicer on the iPad than iPhone.




Michael
Tinmania is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:41 PM   #9
FlameofAnor
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sneakz View Post
The third gen iPad takes pictures comparable to the iPhone 4 or maybe even slightly better.
Yep...... I have taken photos with my new iPad, and the results are pretty good. Especially so for stylized shots, like Hipstamatic. The iPad may be a bit bulky, but having the large screen as a viewfinder is kinda nice.

The Camera+ app is a great deal for $0.99. There are a lot of editing options. Not a Photoshop replacement by any means, but as far as iOS photo editing apps go, it's quite useful.
FlameofAnor is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:43 PM   #10
randallking
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
I use the lock screen shortcut to access my iPhone's Camera app almost always. Even if the phone is unlocked, I will lock it and access Camera through the lock screen because it's faster. Not having lock screen access to Camera+ would probably keep me from using it as my primary camera app. So that's one disadvantage I can think of immediately.
randallking is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:51 PM   #11
D.T.
macrumors 68030
 
D.T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vilano Beach, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcb9289 View Post
I posed this question in another thread, but I feel like I might get an answer more quickly here . . .

With the recent update, I'm thinking of using camera+ as my primary camera app on iPhone 5 . . .can anyone who has made the switch previously comment on the benefits/drawbacks of one versus the other. Is there any loss of quality or functionality in taking photos directly from camera+?

I've used camera+ primarily as an editing tool, but it seems to launch faster than the stock app on the 5, so I'm considering it as my go-to camera.
I've been using Camera+ over the stock camera app, though some reasons aren't valid anymore with the last couple of iOS updates ...

The camera control is better: more pre-shot adjustments, a timer (this is the original reason I picked it up), multi-shot

Editing with color/balance correction, filters

Finally, the sharing options are terrific and there's even an automated sharing setting so you can just shoot pics and they're uploaded automatically!

Now with stock camera and the current OS, you can share much much better, the volume works as a shutter, it's available directly from the lock screen (and it also shoots video). I'd still love some better white balance control and a timer, a few other small details I prefer in Camera +, but it's getting closer.

In fact, many of my fave 3rd party apps are getting used a little less as the stock apps improve (camera, podcast)

Today I actually edited then posted to Flickr using Snapseed which is also a good editing tool (and handles sharing to way more services).
D.T. is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:56 PM   #12
jjpmir
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via AIM to jjpmir Send a message via Yahoo to jjpmir
iCloud API blows!

Quote:
Originally Posted by somethingelsefl View Post
Apple REALLY needs to streamline their iCloud API, especially since much of so much of their future depends on developers integrating iCloud
You are sooooo right, I've had to abandon planned functionality because the codebase was dominated by recovery code - too many exceptions and not enough reliability. I think the API must work because Apple's apps work but the sample app and the provided docs blows beyond belief.
jjpmir is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 02:59 PM   #13
Blomkvist
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: North Carolina
I actually shoot a lot of my pics with my Nikon SLR and use the "camera kit" to transfer them to my iPad 2 for editing (Snapseed, Sketchbook). For $0.99 I may have to give this a try as well.
__________________
32 GB iPhone 5 64 GB iPad 2 27" Aluminum iMac, 3.1 GHz, 12 GB RAM, 1 TB HD 13" Macbook Air 256GB
Blomkvist is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 03:02 PM   #14
kirky29
macrumors 65816
 
kirky29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincolnshire, England
Send a message via Yahoo to kirky29 Send a message via Skype™ to kirky29
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwman View Post
Not to sound like a troll, but do folks really take a lot of pictures with the iPad? I have an iPad 2 and the camera on the back is lousy.
Like others have said, I take photos with my iPhone then via iCloud they sync over, edit them on the iPad and they save back to the iPhone via iCloud - then upload to Facebook & the World!
__________________
27" iMac, 15" MacBook Pro 2.2GHz i7 2011, iPhone 5 16GB - iPad 1/2/3/Mini - 24" Cinema Display,
Apple Magic Mouse, Trackpad, Time Machine, Apple TV,
| Check out my flickr |
kirky29 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 03:16 PM   #15
nutmac
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcb9289 View Post
With the recent update, I'm thinking of using camera+ as my primary camera app on iPhone 5 . . .can anyone who has made the switch previously comment on the benefits/drawbacks of one versus the other. Is there any loss of quality or functionality in taking photos directly from camera+?
The main drawbacks for me are (1) lock screen access and (2) lack of video.

The first drawback applies to all third party apps, but it is just so much more convenient to launch Camera app from the lock screen that I rarely shoot photos with anything but built-in Camera app (exceptions are when I need burst or timer).

As for the second drawback, I have two young kids so switching apps to shoot video and photos increases the risk of losing precious moments.

Other missing functionalities include HDR and panorama (Camera+ has a fake HDR mode that simulates HDR during post processing).
nutmac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 03:26 PM   #16
tcb9289
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutmac View Post
The main drawbacks for me are (1) lock screen access and (2) lack of video.

The first drawback applies to all third party apps, but it is just so much more convenient to launch Camera app from the lock screen that I rarely shoot photos with anything but built-in Camera app (exceptions are when I need burst or timer).

As for the second drawback, I have two young kids so switching apps to shoot video and photos increases the risk of losing precious moments.

Other missing functionalities include HDR and panorama (Camera+ has a fake HDR mode that simulates HDR during post processing).
Thanks for the input, everyone!

Based on the feedback, my plan is to use camera.app for spontaneous video ops, which require quick access from the lockscreen, and use camera+ for taking pictures. I've always found taking a video rarely works out b/c even if I open the camera app from the lock screen, I almost always end up having to wait for the switch from picture to video. With this setup, I can quickly access video (which apparently allows you to capture still images w/ iPhone 5 anyway), while taking advantage of extra features of camera+.

As an aside, I've always wondered about the difference between stock HDR and the post-capture HDR through 3rd party apps. I've never really cared much for the iPhone's HDR images, but I guess that's a product of me not knowing much about photography.

Thanks Again!
tcb9289 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 04:31 PM   #17
nutmac
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcb9289 View Post
Based on the feedback, my plan is to use camera.app for spontaneous video ops, which require quick access from the lockscreen, and use camera+ for taking pictures. I've always found taking a video rarely works out b/c even if I open the camera app from the lock screen, I almost always end up having to wait for the switch from picture to video.
Video/photo toggle, at least on iPhone 5, is much quicker than switching apps (even from the task manager).
nutmac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 04:58 PM   #18
mactmaster
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcb9289 View Post
I posed this question in another thread, but I feel like I might get an answer more quickly here . . .

With the recent update, I'm thinking of using camera+ as my primary camera app on iPhone 5 . . .can anyone who has made the switch previously comment on the benefits/drawbacks of one versus the other. Is there any loss of quality or functionality in taking photos directly from camera+?

I've used camera+ primarily as an editing tool, but it seems to launch faster than the stock app on the 5, so I'm considering it as my go-to camera.
No HDR, no Panorama, no video recording.

You gain separate focus, exposure and white balance locks. Self-timer.

Stay away from the digital zoom, it adds some weird artifacts occasionally and it slows down shooting.
mactmaster is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 05:12 PM   #19
nutmac
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by mactmaster View Post
You gain separate focus, exposure and white balance locks.
iOS 6 Camera has them as standard features.
nutmac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 05:23 PM   #20
Poob Bubes
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
FYI, if you enable iCloud sync it will upload over cellular connection if you're not on wifi. I upgraded earlier and turned it on... now my iPhone 5 battery is draining at a steady clip while all my pics are uploading over LTE. The phone is pretty warm too.
Poob Bubes is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 05:32 PM   #21
mlordi2
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Newbie loking for iCloud help

So as a newer iOS user, I'm looking for some guidance on how this app and others work with iCloud. I've activated both, but I'm confused on the functionality of iCloud. Am I correct that photos will only synch with each device and not be available online in the cloud itself?
mlordi2 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 06:00 PM   #22
nutmac
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poob Bubes View Post
FYI, if you enable iCloud sync it will upload over cellular connection if you're not on wifi.
Settings | General | Cellular | (scroll down to "Use Celullar data for" section) iCloud Documents -> OFF
nutmac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 08:12 PM   #23
nutmac
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcb9289 View Post
Is there any loss of quality or functionality in taking photos directly from camera+?
It seems iOS 6's Camera app takes different looking picture than third party apps.

According to Gruber's Flickr stream, the built-in app has wider ISO range (up to 3200), whereas third party apps are restricted to 800. ISO 800 might be a plus to some (less noisy), but it is a difference worth noting.

From Gruber:
I posted three photos taken with an iPhone 5: one using the built-in Camera app, and two taken with third party apps (Camera Plus Pro and VSCO Cam). I included one taken with the built-in Camera app on an iPhone 4S.

Looking at the EXIF data, the big difference is that the photo shot with the built-in Camera app on the iPhone 5 had an ISO speed of 2500; the other three all maxed out at 800. It appears the iPhone 5 can go up to ISO 3200. That’s the two-stop difference Apple is promoting.
nutmac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2012, 10:28 PM   #24
infowarfare
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Reykjavik, Iceland / Stockholm, Sweden/ Los Angeles, CA/ New York, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutmac View Post
It seems iOS 6's Camera app takes different looking picture than third party apps.

According to Gruber's Flickr stream, the built-in app has wider ISO range (up to 3200), whereas third party apps are restricted to 800. ISO 800 might be a plus to some (less noisy), but it is a difference worth noting.

From Gruber:
I posted three photos taken with an iPhone 5: one using the built-in Camera app, and two taken with third party apps (Camera Plus Pro and VSCO Cam). I included one taken with the built-in Camera app on an iPhone 4S.

Looking at the EXIF data, the big difference is that the photo shot with the built-in Camera app on the iPhone 5 had an ISO speed of 2500; the other three all maxed out at 800. It appears the iPhone 5 can go up to ISO 3200. That’s the two-stop difference Apple is promoting.
No, the iPhone 5 takes a different looking picture than third party apps that were made for the iPhone 4S; in other words, the iPhone 4S had a maximum ISO of 800, so third party camera apps were made to take advantage of that. Now with the iPhone 5, the max is 3200 ISO, so third party apps simply need to be updated; Camera+ was updated today (not to be confused with Camera Plus Pro which is a completely different app/company.)
__________________
-::| info warfare |::-
infowarfare is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2012, 01:00 AM   #25
nutmac
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by infowarfare View Post
No, the iPhone 5 takes a different looking picture than third party apps that were made for the iPhone 4S; in other words, the iPhone 4S had a maximum ISO of 800, so third party camera apps were made to take advantage of that. Now with the iPhone 5, the max is 3200 ISO, so third party apps simply need to be updated; Camera+ was updated today (not to be confused with Camera Plus Pro which is a completely different app/company.)
I've tried taking several photos in low light and I couldn't get Camera+ (3.5, which is the version released today) to take photos with ISO higher than 800.

Here's one comparison.

Camera+ (blocked out maps):


Built-in Camera app:
nutmac is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
【Mobile Drive】Support Various File Formats and Sync with iCloud keke Cai iPhone and iPod touch Apps 8 Sep 9, 2013 11:31 AM
【Mobile Drive】Support Various File Formats and Sync with iCloud keke Cai iPad Apps 7 Aug 31, 2013 10:35 AM
No icloud sync with ipad and NFS: MW, Will this work? digitalduck iPad Tips, Help and Troubleshooting 4 Apr 9, 2013 05:24 PM
Capture 365 Journal PRO (iPhone 5 support, iCloud sync, Universal) Sockii iPhone and iPod touch Apps 10 Feb 11, 2013 03:56 AM
Parallels, Office 10, iCloud Sync will pay for telephone support! KateatMacRumors iCloud and Apple Services 1 Jan 22, 2013 07:06 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC