Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > OS X > OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 2, 2012, 02:13 PM   #1
lukester
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Time machine or CCC?

I am trying to figure the best system to use. I have never used Time machine since it seems slow.
I am thinking of CCC.. thoughts?
lukester is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 2, 2012, 02:15 PM   #2
MacDawg
macrumors P6
 
MacDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: "Between the Hedges"
I use both for different purposes

CCC allows you to boot from your clone
TM does not

Both allow you to migrate your data

I use TM to go back (if needed) to get a file or a "state"
I use CCC in case of catastrophic failure of the HD

I have had occasion to use both and both function well
MacDawg is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 2, 2012, 02:30 PM   #3
lukester
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacDawg View Post
I use both for different purposes

CCC allows you to boot from your clone
TM does not

Both allow you to migrate your data

I use TM to go back (if needed) to get a file or a "state"
I use CCC in case of catastrophic failure of the HD

I have had occasion to use both and both function well
How do you set drives up to handle both?
2 partitions and how large above the original should you go?
lukester is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 2, 2012, 02:46 PM   #4
Partron22
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
I use SuperDuper! rather than CCC., but principles are about the same, so:

I keep a separate drive for periodic and complete SuperDuper! backup of my main drive.
Time Machine partition resides on yet another disk, along w partitions for older Systems and the like. Time machine backups are restricted to only the contents of my Documents and Developer folder, (minus iTunes media library). This lets me keep the size of that partition down to a few hundred gigs, and still have ready access to older copies of whatever docs I'm working on. Apps and such (as well as docs) get BU's every few weeks with the SuperDuper! clone.

I've little need to keep copies of every minor App update, but documents can be another story, so they get the full time-machine treatment.
Partron22 is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 2, 2012, 03:03 PM   #5
Weaselboy
macrumors P6
 
Weaselboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by lukester View Post
How do you set drives up to handle both?
2 partitions and how large above the original should you go?
I use the same setup Macdawg described.

You would want two partitions if you plan to do this with one drive (and there is nothing wrong with that).

How large for Time Machine partition depends a great deal on your usage. If you regularly copy/edit large 5GB video files for example and you create multiple versions of those files, this could very easily swell the Time Machine backup by a never ending 10-15GB or more a day.

For someone like me who only ever adds a few documents here and there to my drive, Time Machine does backups expand very little from the original backup. Right now my SSD has about 60GB of data on it and my Time Machine backup sparse bundle is sitting at 62GB in size... this is from a new backup set I started on July 25. So for me a third or so over the original data amount will hold me a long while.

I would get all my data on the machine then look at how much space you need and add to that maybe half again as a starting point. Like I said, it really depends a lot on what type of work you do on the machine.

Same issue essentially for CCC, as it will archive versions if you want, creating the same storage issues Time Machine has.
Weaselboy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2012, 05:21 AM   #6
throAU
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
As above they solve different problems.

Time machine will give you hourly snapshots of your files to help with the "oh bugger i shouldn't have saved over that" human error type disaster.

You can restore a complete system from it too, but if you're not a regular time machine user, doing an initial backup is very slow.

Time machine, on lion and mountain lion can run "local" backups on your laptop (previous versions of files) if your time machine disk is not attached or available. These snapshots will be deleted if space is required, but if you have free space they're useful. Obviously if your drive dies you're going to have to restore from your time machine disk, but if its just a stupid mistake you can get it back easily.


CCC is probably best if you are planning in advance to wipe your machine or rebuild it to a new disk. It should be a lot faster than time machine, too.

Personally I think running time machine is a no brainer. Grit your teeth through the initial backup then just leave it to run its course as required. It really is "set and forget" if you're backing up to a disk over the network.

Unless you run a backup program religiously every day, typically if you screw something up its likely to be a few days or weeks of time since your last backup and you've lost a lot of work. With time machine you're looking at 1 hour of lost work, tops. Your backups are only as good as how often they are run.

Run CCC if you want to keep a snapshot of your machine permanently, or to replicate it to new hardware.
__________________
MBP (early 2011) - Core i7 2720 2.2ghz, Hires Glossy, 16GB, Seagate Momentus XT 750GB
Mac Mini (mid 2007) - Core2 Duo 1.8, 2gb, 320gb 7200 rpm
iPhone 4S, iPad 4, iPad Mini, HTC One (eval)
throAU is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2012, 03:47 PM   #7
WesCole
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
I use Time Machine, CCC, and CrashPlan.

Here is my reasoning:

1. Time Machine can go back in time and get older copies of files, photos, etc.
2. Time Machine will be great for getting a new Mac setup the way I want it.
3. CCC copies are bootable, so that will reduce downtime in the event of a HDD failure.
4. CrashPlan to back up my movies, photos, music, important files, etc. Basically, I like to keep things on here that can't be easily replaced.
__________________
2010 15" MacBook Pro, Anti-Glare Hi-Res, 2.4 i5 128 GB SSD & 500GB HDD in optibay; iPhone 5 32GB; ATV3; 2011 Core i7 27" iMac 2GB VRAM; "New" iPad 32GB AT&T 4G; 2012 MacBook Air 13", i7, 8GB, 256GB
WesCole is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2012, 03:59 PM   #8
r0k
macrumors 68040
 
r0k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Detroit
Quote:
Originally Posted by WesCole View Post
I use Time Machine, CCC, and CrashPlan.

Here is my reasoning:

1. Time Machine can go back in time and get older copies of files, photos, etc.
2. Time Machine will be great for getting a new Mac setup the way I want it.
3. CCC copies are bootable, so that will reduce downtime in the event of a HDD failure.
4. CrashPlan to back up my movies, photos, music, important files, etc. Basically, I like to keep things on here that can't be easily replaced.
Much like you, I use Time Machine for convenience, CCC for migrating drives and Crashplan for off site backup. I don't back up my movies off site. I can always simply rip them again. I keep the original DVDs down in the basement next to the 78 rpm records, 8 tracks and buggy whips.
__________________
-r0k
Macbook Pro (late 2011) + iPad mini + iPhone5 + (GS4 for work)
Got a scan to ftp scanner? Enable ftpd in Lion/Mavericks/Yosemite!
r0k is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2012, 04:18 PM   #9
WesCole
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by r0k View Post
Much like you, I use Time Machine for convenience, CCC for migrating drives and Crashplan for off site backup. I don't back up my movies off site. I can always simply rip them again. I keep the original DVDs down in the basement next to the 78 rpm records, 8 tracks and buggy whips.
Most of my DVDs have been lost over the years...but, I am not really worried about those anyway; there are always ways to recover those videos. I was talking more about home movies from the 80s and 90s when I was a kid. I ripped them to the computer and, even if I could find the VHS tapes, would not want to repeat that whole process again.
__________________
2010 15" MacBook Pro, Anti-Glare Hi-Res, 2.4 i5 128 GB SSD & 500GB HDD in optibay; iPhone 5 32GB; ATV3; 2011 Core i7 27" iMac 2GB VRAM; "New" iPad 32GB AT&T 4G; 2012 MacBook Air 13", i7, 8GB, 256GB
WesCole is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > OS X > OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Storing time machine and CCC backups on same drive Rossatron Mac Basics and Help 7 Jul 1, 2013 03:59 PM
New SSD -- Time Machine vs. CCC, Trim? Reg88 MacBook Pro 6 Mar 31, 2013 12:43 AM
Time Machine Vs CCC ghsNick Mac Applications and Mac App Store 8 Mar 11, 2013 11:02 AM
Time Machine and CCC users do you still keep a separate set of your data? bobright iMac 16 Dec 20, 2012 04:04 PM
Can I Replace Time Machine files with CCC Files? Help! No Backup will Restore Smittay Mac Applications and Mac App Store 4 Sep 4, 2012 04:00 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC