Go Back   MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod touch

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 9, 2012, 06:34 AM   #1
GoodBoy
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
CONFIRMED - iPod touch 5th gen doesn't lay flat on table :/

See here



Bummer! Damn you Apple

Last edited by OllyW; Oct 9, 2012 at 06:41 AM. Reason: please use youtube tags
GoodBoy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 06:38 AM   #2
Chundles
macrumors G4
 
Chundles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Gong, Australia
Not exactly a shocker as all the photos of the iPod touch clearly show the protruding camera ring.
__________________
This is going straight to the Pool Room
Chundles is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 06:40 AM   #3
GoodBoy
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Yea we knew this, but I thought they somehow managed to make it lay evenly on table. I honestly don't understand this design choice.... I would've preffered 2mm thicker device without this malfunction.
GoodBoy is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 06:42 AM   #4
gladoscc
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
False Advertising

http://images.apple.com/ipod-touch/d...nnest_hero.jpg

Look at this image.

"thinnest hero"

No mention of a camera nub - it gives the impression that it will lay flat when it will not!
__________________
Jailbroken iPhone 4 (brought outright). I run TF2Intel
gladoscc is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 07:34 AM   #5
ninaco
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
I never use the iPod when it's sitting on a table. It's either in my hand or docked. So, I don't mind. But an iPod being wobbly when on a flat surface seems an odd design choice by Apple.
ninaco is online now   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 07:38 AM   #6
caribou123
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
And the world thought the Hindenburg was a tragedy! That was nothing compared to this! It won't lie flat? Oh the humanities! Imagine the lawsuits coming, people damaging their fingers from working on touch that "won't lie flat"! Expect the stock to drop today by 25% folks, this is big news! ;-)
caribou123 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 07:43 AM   #7
Aspasia
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Halfway between the Equator and North Pole
Why is it important or even relevant enough to damn Apple?

Unless the OP always uses it on a flat surface (which seems to defeat the purpose of the device).
Aspasia is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 07:48 AM   #8
caramelpolice
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by caribou123 View Post
And the world thought the Hindenburg was a tragedy! That was nothing compared to this! It won't lie flat? Oh the humanities! Imagine the lawsuits coming, people damaging their fingers from working on touch that "won't lie flat"! Expect the stock to drop today by 25% folks, this is big news! ;-)
I know, right? Jobs would never have let this happen. It's not like two consecutive generations of iPod touch shipped with a curved back that didn't lie flat.

Wait that's totally what it's like.
caramelpolice is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 08:12 AM   #9
GoodBoy
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspasia View Post
Why is it important or even relevant enough to damn Apple?

Unless the OP always uses it on a flat surface (which seems to defeat the purpose of the device).
Because it's weird design choice... Of course given some arguments it's not that big of a deal, but... I never use dock, and when I put my iPod on table when syncing with iTunes or plugging to my battery charger I'd like it to lay evanly on the flat surface. It's not a feature issue, it's a design distracting issue. The device shouldn't wobble when put on flat table. It's just wrong. Sure it doesn't affect using the iPod, but it doesn't mean it's ok, especially coming from the company the design is one of the most important value.
GoodBoy is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 08:17 AM   #10
Jsameds
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Get a case.

2 birds - one stone.
Jsameds is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 08:24 AM   #11
dthree36
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Not a big deal, I expected this based on every photo I saw of it.
__________________
IMac, Macbook Pro, Ipad 2, Ipod Shuffle, Iphone 4S
dthree36 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 08:25 AM   #12
Project538
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Iowa, USA
Send a message via Skype™ to Project538
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoodBoy View Post
The device shouldn't wobble when put on flat table. It's just wrong.
The 2nd gen touch wobbled when put on a table due to its curved back. Never bothered me. I typically don't use it while it's down on a table anyway, I only set it on tables when I won't be using it or when it's playing music and I have my headphones plugged in. I don't think the fact that it doesn't lay flat is really that big of a deal. Can't we just all be excited that our nice, expensive, $300 toys are being shipped to us instead of finding things to complain about before we even have them in our hands?
__________________
Twitter: @Project538
 13" MacBook Air (Mid 2012), iPad 2 (16GB Wi-Fi), 6th generation iPod nano (8GB), 5th generation iPod touch (32GB)
Project538 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 08:26 AM   #13
qwerty808
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
meanwhile in africa....

srsly, buy a piece of foam ffs.
qwerty808 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 08:28 AM   #14
GoodBoy
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Maybe, but...
1) The material covering and around the camera will probably scratch pretty fast due to the fact it's gonna have the most frequent contact with surfaces when laying flat. And yes sapphire glass scratches as well
2) It's probably gonna need some good case.
3) Steve wouldn't have allowed this...

Last edited by GoodBoy; Oct 9, 2012 at 08:35 AM.
GoodBoy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 10:36 AM   #15
Techwriter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
I'm more concerned about the earpods. If you look at the Apple website, it doesn't mention that the ones shipping with the iPod Touch have the remote. The iPhone has the earpods with remote but I don't think the iPod Touch includes it. This video doesn't show the remote feature either and I use it a lot on my 3rd generation iPod Touch earbuds.
Techwriter is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 10:50 AM   #16
AppleMooseMan
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Techwriter View Post
I'm more concerned about the earpods. If you look at the Apple website, it doesn't mention that the ones shipping with the iPod Touch have the remote. The iPhone has the earpods with remote but I don't think the iPod Touch includes it. This video doesn't show the remote feature either and I use it a lot on my 3rd generation iPod Touch earbuds.
Correct, no remote and mic. Not surprising. Previous iPod touches did not come with a remote or mic either.
AppleMooseMan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 10:51 AM   #17
Steveo13
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New York
Thats a little ridiculous that you pay $299.00/399.00 plus tax and you don't even get the earpods with the remote which probably only costs like $1 more to manufacture.

__________________
24" iMac 3.06 GHz15" Macbook Pro 2.53GHz i5iPhone 6 Plus 64GB (VZ)iPhone 4S 64GB (VZ)iPad3 64GB LTE (VZ)Apple TV3iPod mini 6GB
Steveo13 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 10:54 AM   #18
GoodBoy
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
iPod touch 3rd generation came with earphones with remote and mic. Since iPod touch 4th gen Apple forces it's customers to buy earphones with remote and mic separetely to make more money.
GoodBoy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 10:55 AM   #19
Jsameds
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steveo13 View Post
Thats a little ridiculous that you pay $299.00/399.00 plus tax and you don't even get the earpods with the remote which probably only costs like $1 more to manufacture.

Aww diddums, so upsetting...

If it concerns you that much, sell the earpods that come with the iPod and buy the ones that have a remote.
Jsameds is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 11:00 AM   #20
AppleMooseMan
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jsameds View Post
Aww diddums, so upsetting...

If it concerns you that much, sell the earpods that come with the iPod and buy the ones that have a remote.
I love Apple, but this kind of crap turns me off them.
There is no logical reason to lose the mic and remote.
This will only cause anger to customers who presumed there would be.
AppleMooseMan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 11:12 AM   #21
archurban
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Send a message via ICQ to archurban
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleMooseMan View Post
I love Apple, but this kind of crap turns me off them.
There is no logical reason to lose the mic and remote.
This will only cause anger to customers who presumed there would be.
apple has become very tricky to customers nowadays. actually, $29 earpods doesn't make cost higher for the whole package. I can't believe that apple just did it. if Steve Jobs would still be alive, this ******** won't be happened. so sad. apple just wants to make more money. they don't care about customers anymore. die, apple.
archurban is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 11:13 AM   #22
touchipods
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoodBoy View Post
Maybe, but...
1) The material covering and around the camera will probably scratch pretty fast due to the fact it's gonna have the most frequent contact with surfaces when laying flat. And yes sapphire glass scratches as well
2) It's probably gonna need some good case.
3) Steve wouldn't have allowed this...
I thought this as well watching one of the unboxing videos. I do wonder if you accidentally hit the touch hard on a table, it may shatter the insides of the camera or through general wear-and-tear.

I also wonder when the loop is 'activated' does it make the touch lay more flat?
touchipods is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 11:13 AM   #23
jimmirehman
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
This has got to be the dumbest thing to whine about. There has never been an ipod touch that layed flat.

Last edited by jimmirehman; Oct 9, 2012 at 11:19 AM.
jimmirehman is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 11:20 AM   #24
Project538
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Iowa, USA
Send a message via Skype™ to Project538
Quote:
Originally Posted by touchipods View Post
I also wonder when the loop is 'activated' does it make the touch lay more flat?
It doesn't look like it. The loop button is on the same side of the iPod as the camera is, which would probably just make it lay at a weirder angle if you popped it out first.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmirehman View Post
This has got to be the dumbest thing ti whine about. There has never been an ipod touch that layed flat.
^This! I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees this. The 2nd and 3rd generation iPod touches had curved backs, and they wobble if you try to use them while laying on a table. But does that really matter? Who the heck lays their iPod down on a table to use it for any extended period of time? That's what iPads are for. iPods are much better suited for in-hand use, in which case a camera protrusion will make no difference whatsoever.
__________________
Twitter: @Project538
 13" MacBook Air (Mid 2012), iPad 2 (16GB Wi-Fi), 6th generation iPod nano (8GB), 5th generation iPod touch (32GB)
Project538 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2012, 11:25 AM   #25
dchao
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoodBoy View Post

Bummer! Damn you Apple
What's the problem???

Most people are going to put the IPT5 in a case with a camera lens cut out. So the case will lay FLAT on the table.
__________________
Mac Pro Quad-Core (2008)
dchao is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod touch

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iPod Touch 4th gen vs 5th gen? jread iPod touch 18 Jul 15, 2013 02:35 AM
iPod touch 5th gen Resp2saveU iPod touch 7 Jun 11, 2013 01:23 AM
iPad Mini: Apple iPad Mini Smart Cover not great, doesn't lay flat\stay on shenan1982 iPad Accessories 58 Dec 8, 2012 05:18 PM
iPod Touch 4th Gen Or 5th Gen? Goftrey iPod touch 8 Sep 22, 2012 09:23 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC