Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Web Design and Development

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 21, 2012, 08:20 PM   #1
Mooey
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
iMac or Mac Mini for Web Development?

Hey all,

with the upcoming release, I was wondering if it would be better to get an iMac or a Mac Mini for just mainly web development? I will probably have to have Adobe Photoshop / Fireworks installed, and I may do a bit of programming outside of the web development workflow. I was wondering if the Mac Mini would suffice, or if I would just need to bump up to the iMac.

Thanks.
Mooey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 21, 2012, 09:02 PM   #2
12dylan34
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
The mini with an appropriately large screen would suffice, I think. It comes down to what else you want to do with the machine. If you intend to game as well, get the iMac.
12dylan34 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 21, 2012, 09:39 PM   #3
Mooey
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12dylan34 View Post
The mini with an appropriately large screen would suffice, I think. It comes down to what else you want to do with the machine. If you intend to game as well, get the iMac.
It's for work primarily so I won't be doing any gaming or anything, just purely web development and some front-end design with Photoshop and Fireworks.
Mooey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2012, 09:19 AM   #4
fig
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Yeah, you should be fine with the Mini if that's the route you choose to go. I use a much slower machine now for web dev, design, and photoshop work and don't have any issues unless I get into high res print work.

Just load it up with RAM and go with the SSD (or add one) if possible and you'll have a snappy little machine.
__________________
figdigital | @figdigital | dribbble
fig is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2012, 09:24 AM   #5
Dornblaser
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago-area
The iMac is a better machine. Price them both out after the updates are announced tomorrow.
Dornblaser is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2012, 09:31 AM   #6
segovius
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Barcelona / Berlin
Send a message via AIM to segovius Send a message via Yahoo to segovius Send a message via Skype™ to segovius
I am in the same boat. My plan is simple yet cunning:

IF iMac = matte option or less glare revised screen

THEN iMac

IF ELSE

Mac Mini with 3rd party matte screen
segovius is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2012, 09:42 AM   #7
Geolink
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New York
Lol!
Geolink is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2012, 09:59 AM   #8
phoenixsan
macrumors 65816
 
phoenixsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
I will go with....

The iMac, because:

1- In the 27 inch version you have plenty of screen to work
2-Better graphics
3-Better storage options
4-Slightly better processor

If so, I will modify the iMac with more RAM (max out) or maybe a SSD

Having say the above, if you have a nice screen, good keyboard and mouse, maybe the mini is the way to go, with modifications:

-SSD
-Max out the RAM
-External Firewire storage
phoenixsan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2012, 02:33 PM   #9
Mooey
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Now that both the Mac Mini and iMac have been announced, can anyone give me an opinion on what they would do if they were in my position?
Mooey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2012, 02:35 PM   #10
fig
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mooey View Post
Now that both the Mac Mini and iMac have been announced, can anyone give me an opinion on what they would do if they were in my position?
I'm in a similar boat and it's honestly a coin flip, probably less so if you already have a really nice display. Both will be more than adequate, I'm going to check out the benchmarks when everything is released and then decide.
__________________
figdigital | @figdigital | dribbble
fig is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2012, 02:37 PM   #11
Dornblaser
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago-area
iMac. No question.
Dornblaser is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2012, 02:51 PM   #12
BillyBobBongo
macrumors 68000
 
BillyBobBongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On The Interweb Thingy!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mooey View Post
Now that both the Mac Mini and iMac have been announced, can anyone give me an opinion on what they would do if they were in my position?
I'd go with the iMac.

Keep in mind that the only program that is really going to tax your system, that you mentioned, is Photoshop. The base model with 8GB of RAM will easily suit your needs, and no doubt serve you well for the next few years without ever requiring an upgrade.
__________________
"You didn't have a bad experience with tequila, you had an experience with bad tequila!" : crushedagave
Mac Pro: 2.93GHz Quad-Core, iMac 21.5":2.7 GHz Core i5, MacBook Air: 1.8GHz i5
BillyBobBongo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2012, 02:56 PM   #13
SrWebDeveloper
macrumors 68000
 
SrWebDeveloper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA, USA
 
Both have sufficient resources (memory, wifi, ethernet, disk storage) to do what you do since you noted you have the peripherals and monitors. One is obviously much more portable if that matters to you, so maybe you need to figure out of being able to toss it in your soft case and connect remotely from home (if you have monitor, peripherals there as well) or you don't care and always work in your office.

I personally might consider the retina capable MacBook Pro 13" or 15" as I get complete portability and remote connectivity along with ability to dual monitor at work or home. Especially if you travel or do presentations.
__________________
Jim Goldbloom
Sr. Web Developer, owner GoldTechPro, LLC
http://www.GoldTechPro.com
SrWebDeveloper is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2012, 03:17 PM   #14
blanka
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Go with the Mini. The iMac is a total new design that is going to have a false start with production problems. With the mini, you're set. Attach it to a Dell 2711 or the new 27 inch samsung PLS displays, and you have a great matte 2560x1440 display that in the Dell case also allows AdobeRGB/sRGB switching (Macs are limited to sRGB only with white-LED backlights).
blanka is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 24, 2012, 12:14 AM   #15
NVWebsites
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
 
I think you will be covered with either. I have a Mac Pro and looked at the specs today of the iMac; it looks relatively comparable except I opted for the 8 core- 2 X 2.4 GHz Quad.

I run Adobe Design Premium products like Dreamweaver and Illustrator. I use Eclipse to write PHP on my localhost.

I'm very pleased with how it runs. I use Mackeeper periodically to clear all the cache that is generated when I feel like it needs a bit of cleanup.
__________________
Learn web development! New Venture Websites provides custom websites and cloud business software.
NVWebsites is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 24, 2012, 03:17 AM   #16
LaunchpadBS
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: iLondon/iDurban
The new Mac Mini base model even should more than cover you, I'm doing a fair amount of dev work on my 13" MBP base model with 16GB ram and an SSD and even with XCode, MSVS2008 and GIMP I have no hassles running iTunes and 3 browsers for testing.
People seem to be massively underestimating these new gen intel processors.
At the office they have us working on 4 year old core 2 duo machines and I struggle to even slow those down with all sorts of dev tools and DB's running.
__________________
Mac Mini i7 2012 - 13" MBP 2012 - iPhone 5 - iPod Shuffle - iPad Air - iPod Classic - ATV 2
LaunchpadBS is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 24, 2012, 09:32 AM   #17
GGJstudios
macrumors Westmere
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mooey View Post
My question is which would be better for what I do at work?
Any Mac model can easily handle web development tasks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NVWebsites View Post
I use Mackeeper periodically to clear all the cache that is generated when I feel like it needs a bit of cleanup.
I highly recommend you uninstall MacKeeper. You don't need "cleaner" or "maintenance" apps to keep your Mac running well, and some of these apps can do more harm than good. Some can even degrade, rather than improve system performance.

Some remove files/folders or unused languages or architectures, which does nothing more than free up some drive space, with the risk of deleting something important in the process. These apps will not make your Mac run faster or more efficiently, since having stuff stored on a drive does not impact performance, unless you're running out of drive space.

Some of these apps delete caches, which can hurt performance, rather than help it, since more system resources are used and performance suffers while each cache is being rebuilt. Caches exist to improve performance, so deleting them isn't advisable in most cases.

Many of the tasks performed by these apps should only be done selectively to troubleshoot specific problems, not en masse as routine maintenance.

Mac OS X does a good job of taking care of itself, without the need for 3rd party software. Among other things, it has its own maintenance scripts that run silently in the background on a daily, weekly and monthly basis, without user intervention.
Five Mac maintenance myths
GGJstudios is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 24, 2012, 09:53 AM   #18
fig
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
I think I commented on this in the other thread, but I now do more than what you're looking to do on a 2007 iMac. I think you're good either way
__________________
figdigital | @figdigital | dribbble
fig is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2012, 07:01 PM   #19
definitive
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
13" macbook pro or air, and some ~$200 24" or 27" screen with some converter plug should probably be enough for you.
definitive is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2013, 01:29 PM   #20
Mooey
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Update:

Hey all,

I just wanted to give you all an update in case anyone was in the same boat. I went with the Mac Mini. It's perfect for everything I do. I bumped the RAM up to 16GB and threw in a SSD. It loads 50MB photoshop files flawlessly, compiles my code without a hitch, and uploads/downloads 1GB> folders / files with no hiccups.

Perfect little machine for what I needed. I really liked the iMac's design, but I already had all of the equipment to make a computer. I would say if you don't have any monitors / keyboads / mice to go with the iMac, but if you have the other stuff, go with the Mac Mini.
Mooey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 13, 2013, 05:29 PM   #21
tekboi
macrumors 6502a
 
tekboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Orleans ✈ WesŦward
I would have recommend the 27" iMAC for web design. This thing is an absolute beauty to work with. And the resolution is twice of most monitors of the same size. But if you already have monitors... I guess the mac mini would suffice.
__________________
PowerMac G4 | iMac 27" | Macbook Pro | iPad | iPhone | Thunderbolt Display
---
My Site | Facebook | My Twitter
tekboi is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Web Design and Development

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new laptop needed for web development/game design/app development olup Web Design and Development 6 Oct 2, 2013 03:09 PM
Mac's in a web development office? webcity Buying Tips and Advice 14 Apr 21, 2013 06:55 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC