|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#51 |
|
Yes it appears to, based on the photo in the first post on the second page
__________________
Mac Pro 3,1: 8 Core 2.8 GHz|16GB|Radeon 5870|2TB+120GB SSD
MacBook Pro 8,2: 2.5 GHz i7|16GB|750GB+240GB SSD iPhone 5, iPad 4, 11" Macbook Air, 12" Powerbook G4 |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Quote:
We really don't need smaller and lighter do we???? How often do you move your iMac around or put in your messenger bag????? I was hoping for desktop graphics cards.... GT 640M graphics to start? ....
|
||
|
|
8
|
|
|
#53 |
|
it'll be fun to see one of the teardown sites take these apart.
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#54 |
|
iApple
Officially today Apple announced they are adding "i" in front of their name and it is going to be called iApple
![]() Death to the Mac desktops!
__________________
iPhone 5/4S| iPad 4 | iPad mini | Nexus 7 | Kindle Nov2012| Mac Mini| Core i7 2.3GHz QC | 330 240GB USB 3 | Viewsonic 21.5" 1920x1080 Sep2012|Toshiba 14" | i5 2.5Ghz 1366x768 |Win 7 | x-25M 120GB |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#55 |
|
|
7
|
|
|
#56 |
|
I'd think that "professionals" would probably get either the bigger imac or a different model entirely. While I'm a fan of expansion, especially ram, it doesn't really bug me when the other model has four ram slots.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Quote:
)... And I use a 21.5" iMac... Would I love a 27"? Sure! Can I live with 22" (rounded) and use the $$ difference somewhere else, hell yeah.With my 2006 iMac (still running!) and 2010 MBP, I started with the stock ram and maxed it out. I don't see why I wouldn't do that... if I could...
__________________
But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say he has an Android phone, an iPhone or no phone. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg. - Thomas Jefferson |
||
|
|
7
|
|
|
#58 |
|
I checked the Apple site, and there's no way to see build options for the iMacs. Does this mean we can't see them until Nov/Dec.?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#59 |
|
The 21.5" has a 5,400 RPM HDD? LOL!
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
#60 |
|
I would blame the non user-upgradeable storage, but these SSD caches work pretty well.
I've tested a Samsung ultrabook with just 16GB SSD cache and it boots and wakes up pretty fast, so it's a better approach bringing 128GB SSD cache plus an 1TB HDD than only installing an expensive 256GB SSD. Of course, Apple's "ExpressCache" it's not as innovative as they say. Actually it's pretty outdated. I would hope this approach in the new MBPro retina. It would be nice having a 500GB HDD cached in a 32GB SSD.
__________________
iWon't |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Lovin' the Fusion drive.
OS and apps on SSD with programs and data on the HDD? Brilliant! Just like my RiscPC has had for >15 years!
__________________
13" MBA i7; 27" iMac 3.06 GHz; iPhone 4S; iPad2 3G; Toshiba Tecra M5; Acorn StrongARM RiscPC 32Mb (yes - 32Mb!)
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#62 |
|
To make a slimmer desktop?
__________________
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#63 |
|
iMac mini
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#64 |
|
I need some advice....ive been waiting for an iMac since June and I thought waiting for the new one would be worth it but after seeing it im now a lil disappointed. Not disappointed with the loss of the optical but the upgradable ram.
I plan to use it for logic pro so should I wait and get this with 8 gb or buy current version (which is cheaper) and just upgrade the ram myself and for cheaper!! USB 3 isn't really that important for me yet specially since the current version has thunderbolt. Also it being thinner is cool but useless for a desktop. I'd rather they made the ram upgradable and the hd 7200 |
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Quote:
These new iMacs are a joke. I keep saying Apple is obsessed about limiting choice for consumers, but everytime they make a small incremental change like this that is detrimental for users, the hoards of apple fanboys *always* overlook the criticisms. What could have POSSIBLY been so wrong with letting users upgrade the ram on their own? Would an iMac not be as good if it had that ability? Would an iPhone be worse off if the battery was replaceable? Would the original iPod not be the same if it didn't force the use of iTunes? What the hell is so wrong with CHOICE? These normal optional things make *zero* of a difference for the complete noobs, it doesnt make things any more complicated. |
||
|
|
5
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Is the 16 GB RAM upgrade online fairly priced though? Because it's worth maxing out your machine when you order it anyway, since you will eventually need the extra RAM at some point, might as well get the most out of it from the start. Unless throwing away the 8GB that came with it and replacing it with 16GB of your favorite brand is still cheaper?
__________________
Sent from my iPod Shuffle |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#67 | ||
|
Quote:
Or you could try a Hackintosh. ---------- Quote:
|
|||
|
|
5
|
|
|
#68 |
|
5400 RPM is fine because for me battery life is much more important than drive speed.
Last edited by dejo; Oct 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM. Reason: Restoring damaged post. |
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#69 |
|
I suspect that Apple purposely got rid of user replaceable parts like the hard drive in order to push their agenda of the FAILURE that was Thunderbolt and get people to buy devices that use the port. Looks like theyre trying to save thunderbolt. I won't be using it. USB3 is a safer route seeing how its compatible with basically every computer on the planet.
Nice move, Apple
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Quote:
YOu can already see too that they had to raise their pricepoint so cost was an issue relatively speaking. I mean obviously they have a nice profit margin on all their products. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#71 |
|
|
2
|
|
|
#72 |
|
I guess if I ever want to buy a non-portable laptop, I know where to go. Just like Apple... form >>>>> function.
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
#73 |
|
No replaceable RAM is one too many FU's from Apple.
Stick it, Cook. I'm done. |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Quote:
Battery life in a desktop system? Are you referring to the battery life of the UPS?
__________________
"Equations are the devil's sentences." - Stephen Colbert |
||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#75 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
2011 Macbook Pro 2.2Ghz / 16GB RAM / 240GB HD SSD/256GB HD SSD IPad Mini/ IPhone 4s My Geekbench Scores |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.







....



)... And I use a 21.5" iMac... Would I love a 27"? Sure! Can I live with 22" (rounded) and use the $$ difference somewhere else, hell yeah.
13" MBA i7;
Linear Mode
