Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > OS X > Mac OS X Server, Xserve, and Networking

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 31, 2012, 11:23 AM   #1
whyrichard
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Send a message via AIM to whyrichard
OSX Server Newb... upgrade?

Hey,

I am an osx Server newb (but a vet in many other respects).
At work we have three macs running SL to ML. We connect via wifi to our server, where our main repository for our working files exists.

This works well enough if you are stuck in the '90's. The problem is that our workflow is as follows:

-Copy the working files to our local hard drives (they can be up to 100 gigs (3d modeling)

-Edit them locally

-Update the server

-get mixed up over which is the most updated file/ find conflicts/ spend 20 minutes managing the server files/ etc. who updated last?


I WOULD PREFER to switch to dropbox or google drive for the management of all of these files, and just sidestep the whole centralized server model of operating, but my boss would like to avoid a subscription based pay structure.

IDEALLY we would find a way to have dropbox like capabilities (auto update files, versioning) but operate only on the LAN so there are no privacy issues or subscriptions to pay. Is there such a thing? (perhaps a good syncing software for this type of work environment? which is best?)

The OSX Server version we are on is currently 10.6.8. What benefits would we have in upgrading to ML? I heard it was not so good...?

We would prefer a low maintenance server setup, not only over time but initially.

Thanks so much for any help and guidance!

r.
__________________
09QuadMacPro/2xIntelSSD's/ati/nvidea,macbookpro2ghz/iphone3gs16gig / tibook/powerbook/ibook/duo/classic/lc/newton / ipod5/10/30
shuffle/60 '80 moto guzzi 1000sp/ktmdukeII/theworldsumluv
whyrichard is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 12:39 PM   #2
whyrichard
Thread Starter
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Send a message via AIM to whyrichard
looking into GoodSync... anyone have experience with this?


http://www.goodsync.com/mac/how-it-w...o-sync-via-ftp



r.
__________________
09QuadMacPro/2xIntelSSD's/ati/nvidea,macbookpro2ghz/iphone3gs16gig / tibook/powerbook/ibook/duo/classic/lc/newton / ipod5/10/30
shuffle/60 '80 moto guzzi 1000sp/ktmdukeII/theworldsumluv
whyrichard is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 05:32 PM   #3
dazey
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Perhaps I am missing something, but why can't you ditch wireless and go for a wired gigabit ethernet system and work off the server? If your files are large then dropbox etc is well out of the question, not just because of privacy but bandwidth. Is gigabit ethernet too slow? Regardless it would shrink the time to copy files to the local machines. Wireless is slow

Syncing can never get around the problem of who wins when two people edit the same offline file at the same time with different edits. I like chronosync for syncing but you really want something that locks people out of files when someone is working on them
dazey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 06:17 PM   #4
Les Kern
macrumors 68030
 
Les Kern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alabama
I'm with dazey. Work off the server. KISS.
There is just no reason not to, and there is NO way a Dropbox-like solution will even work.

Also, don't upgrade. 10.6.8 is an EXCELLENT server OS for what you want to do. I have about 15 of them, never hardly hiccup. Set up users, set up a shared drive, apply ACL's, all in about 10 minutes, up and running.
Les Kern is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2012, 11:51 PM   #5
davida1
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Atlanta
Another agreement. Use the server, don't 'upgrade'. It's downhill after 10.6.8.
davida1 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2012, 01:22 PM   #6
Yebubbleman
macrumors 68020
 
Yebubbleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
If you plan on doing a lot of iOS MDM or if all you really do is machine management, then in some ways 10.7 Server is nicer. Though, 10.6 Server will always offer more features and more control (hence the substantially larger price tag). 10.8 Server, or rather "10.8 with OS X Server" as it is formally referred to, ought to be avoided unless your needs are even simpler and there's a requirement to be running 10.8 (i.e. you are at an Apple Authorized Service Provider and the version of Apple Service Toolkit won't work with anything other than Mountain Lion; though I don't think we're there yet).

But otherwise, I have nothing useful to add other than the same "just use your server" and "you have no reason to upgrade from OS X Server 10.6.8" as everyone else here.
__________________
MacBook Pro (15" Mid 2012); PC Tower (3.4GHz Phenom II x4; Radeon HD 6850); 5th Gen iPod touch; 2nd and 3rd Gen tv; iPad Air Verizon; Galaxy S5 Verizon
"Don't Cry, Eat Pie"
Yebubbleman is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > OS X > Mac OS X Server, Xserve, and Networking

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OSX Server - A few Q's Macs4u Mac OS X Server, Xserve, and Networking 10 Aug 4, 2013 05:43 AM
Anyone upgrade from Snow Leopard Server to Mountain Lion + Server.app? talmy Mac OS X Server, Xserve, and Networking 13 Jul 14, 2013 11:22 AM
newb - SSD upgrade suggestions? sou1 so1di3r Mac mini 52 Jul 31, 2012 06:17 PM
Actualizing my mini server to OSX server ecapdeville Mac OS X Server, Xserve, and Networking 3 Jul 25, 2012 10:54 PM
Upgrade Lion Server to ML Server? ryanide OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion 1 Jul 25, 2012 03:16 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC