Go Back   MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPad

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 5, 2012, 10:46 AM   #1
KittyKatta
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: SoCal
What if the 7.9" Mini came first? Would you want a bigger iPad?

What if the $329 7.9" Mini came first? Would you be dreaming of a bigger model still? Would a $499 starting point for a 9.7" Retina feel too expensive?

Ever since the iPads introduction in 2010 we've been told that 9.7" is the perfect screen size and many out here have preached that as gospel. But now that we've gotten a chance to use the iPad Mini in the real world then i'm curious if anyones opinions have changed.

I'm not putting down the 9.7" iPad at all because I still like it, but if we were all trained to use 7" tablets from the start then I wonder if any of us would be as eager to invest in a bigger and more powerful one or if we'd dismiss it as a "pro model" that isn't meant for us.
KittyKatta is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 10:53 AM   #2
Night Spring
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Very hard to say. As I said in another thread I started last night, I dropped by an Apple store to play with a mini, and felt that the size is awkward to hold. But that may be because I've gotten used to the 9.7 size so if the 7.9 had come first, who knows?

An interesting comparison might be the Kindle and Kindle DX. Amazon came out first with the Kindle, then later came out with the larger DX. But my guess is the DX didn't sell well, because Amazon eventually discontinued that size.
Night Spring is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:04 AM   #3
sneaky butcher
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
It would all depend on what steve jobs said on stage

But i think people do like a bigger screen but hate the weight of 10 inch tabs

I admit when i first picked up an ipad 2 i wasn't offended by the weight i think its right on the limit of max weight for a tablet . Ipad 3 however was like a brick my friend also had one of those fancy covers which must have added a bit but it felt intrusively heavy compared to the ipad 2.

Lighter weight 10inch tabs i think are the best experience the smaller ones are a compromise between the functions and weight/portability of a full size tablet.
sneaky butcher is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:06 AM   #4
nuckinfutz
macrumors 603
 
nuckinfutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Middle Earth
Yup

I would be all over a larger iPad.
nuckinfutz is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:08 AM   #5
entatlrg
macrumors Demi-God
 
entatlrg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Waterloo & Georgian Bay, Canada
Absolutely, MANY people would ... a larger screen would be the 'best thing ever'

The iPad intro has been odd though ... in most everything bigger screen comes after smaller ones, not vice versa...
entatlrg is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:13 AM   #6
Phil A.
macrumors 68040
 
Phil A.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Telford, UK
I'll be honest - I was one of those people who thought 9.7" was the sweet spot. However, I now think its the aspect ratio that makes the iPad so much more ergonomic than widescreen tablets (particularly in portrait mode), and the 7.9" screen is so much more portable that I prefer it to the "full sized" screen of the original iPad
Phil A. is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:14 AM   #7
Rodster
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuckinfutz View Post
Yup

I would be all over a larger iPad.
So would I but since it's reversed i'll be getting a Mini just hoping for a good refresh next year.
Rodster is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:16 AM   #8
A Hebrew
macrumors 6502a
 
A Hebrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Minnesota
If the ipad mini had retina, maybe. I don't see how people are so weak to say that the ipad feels like a brick in your hand. They should spend less time on the Internet and more lifting things.
A Hebrew is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:17 AM   #9
ixodes
macrumors 601
 
ixodes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pacific Coast, USA
Yes, absolutely.

I only wish Apple had not clung to their conservative thinking, choosing to wait and wait and wait before entering the mid sized 7" +/- category.
__________________
An Ultra Fast Mac Is...My Favorite
ixodes is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:23 AM   #10
hyteckit
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Nope.

I ended up buying two android 7" tablets because apple didn't offer one.

I always felt the 7" would be the perfect size for me.
hyteckit is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:26 AM   #11
corvus32
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
I think most wouldn't, which is good Apple released a larger ipad first. They made billions by keeping their tablet and smartphone products separate, but if you merge the two you get an iPad Mini with wifi+cellular. I'm pulling for this convergence so high priced phone contracts become a thing of the past.
__________________
Asus Maximus VII Impact mITX motherboard / Intel i7-4790K / MSI GTX 980 Gaming OC / 8GB G.SKILL TridentX 2400MHz CAS 9 RAM
iPad Air (128GB) / Apple TV (3rd Gen)
corvus32 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:31 AM   #12
ditzy
macrumors 68000
 
ditzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
I love the extra screen real estate of the 9.7 but love the portability of the 7.9. I don't think that a perfect product is possible, but both sets of compromises make sense to me.
__________________
15 inch retina MBP. 64GB iPhone 5s Gold, iPad mini 32GB Black and slate.
ditzy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:33 AM   #13
jdiamond
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Need a 14" iPad - I felt the original iPad was too small...

Everyone has "tent pole" reasons for buying an iPad - the non-luxury, killer apps that justify the purchase. For me, it's being a pro grade eReader for reading technical papers and websites. For my use, a non-retina iPad was already an impossibility. The Retina iPad is useable, but I hate having to squint and hold it up to my eyes because it squeezes what's normally a full sized page onto a half of a page.

What I want more than anything is a 14" diagonal iPad Pro. The size of a single sheet of paper. The weight of a pad of paper. Then I can read all my technical stuff at WYSIWYG size and not strain my eyes. It also makes web browsing a lot easier, and magazine reading more fun. And think of the enhanced ability to use content creation software.

While I agree that you don't want something you hold all the time to be *heavier*, as far as portability and size goes, for me, an iPad the size of a piece of paper (14") is no less portable than a 10" iPad. To me, the 10" iPad was simply smaller to reduce cost - not because it's better in any other way. Steve Jobs himself said 10" is the SMALLEST the iPad should be, not the biggest.

So while I'll easily settle for an iPad4, it won't be my final "iPad" - I really still need one with a bigger screen.

Oh, because it's relevant to the thread, I'd probably be willing to pay $1,200 for a 14" iPad Pro. It's actually worth more than that to me, probably about $2,500, but I'm poor now and so can't really save up that much. But I'd rate the value of a larger iPad for me to be a little higher than that of a Macbook Pro.

Last edited by jdiamond; Nov 5, 2012 at 11:41 AM.
jdiamond is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:35 AM   #14
WillFisher
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
The way I see it, is if I was rich enough to afford a 7.9" it would go like this:
I would have a 9.7" iPad is a "home" iPad. Something with several accounts for like a Man, Wife and maybe child.
The 7.9" iPad would be a personal iPad that would not leave my bag for trips and work etc.
Essentially the iPad mini would be a more advanced kindle. Something I wouldn't use much unless I was travelling.
Almost like a home computer and laptop idea. But a home computer that can move around like a laptop. Hah.
__________________
2013 MBA, i5/256/8 with a Samsung Display
2011 Mac Mini 2.3GHz i5, Focusrite 2i2, White Audioengine A2, Blue Snowball Mic

iToys: White iPhone 5, White iPad 3, ATV3, Time Capsule, Airport Express.
WillFisher is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:35 AM   #15
hyteckit
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdiamond View Post
Everyone has "tent pole" reasons for buying an iPad - the non-luxury, killer apps that justify the purchase. For me, it's being a pro grade eReader for reading technical papers and websites. For my use, a non-retina iPad was already an impossibility. The Retina iPad is useable, but I hate having to squint and hold it up to my eyes because it squeezes what's normally a full sized page onto a half of a page.

What I want more than anything is a 14" diagonal iPad Pro. The size of a single sheet of paper. The weight of a pad of paper. Then I can read all my technical stuff at WYSIWYG size and not strain my eyes. It also makes web browsing a lot easier, and magazine reading more fun. And think of the enhanced ability to use content creation software.

While I agree that you don't want something you hold all the time to be *heavier*, as far as portability and size goes, for me, an iPad the size of a piece of paper (14") is no less portable than a 10" iPad. To me, the 10" iPad was simply smaller to reduce cost - not because it's better in any other way. Steve Jobs himself said 10" is the SMALLEST the iPad should be, not the biggest.

So while I'll easily settle for an iPad4, it won't be my final "iPad" - I really still need one with a bigger screen.
Hmm... I might go for a 13" or 14" retina tablet with stylus.
hyteckit is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2012, 11:41 AM   #16
ditzy
macrumors 68000
 
ditzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillFisher View Post
The way I see it, is if I was rich enough to afford a 7.9" it would go like this:
I would have a 9.7" iPad is a "home" iPad. Something with several accounts for like a Man, Wife and maybe child.
The 7.9" iPad would be a personal iPad that would not leave my bag for trips and work etc.
Essentially the iPad mini would be a more advanced kindle. Something I wouldn't use much unless I was travelling.
Almost like a home computer and laptop idea. But a home computer that can move around like a laptop. Hah.
I think this says what I think better than I did. It's kind of like the 9.7 is a 'desktop' iPad while the 7.9 is a 'laptop' iPad.
__________________
15 inch retina MBP. 64GB iPhone 5s Gold, iPad mini 32GB Black and slate.
ditzy is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPad

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iPad Mini: New ipad mini non retina with bigger battery ? coco67 iPad 2 Oct 28, 2013 05:29 PM
iPad Mini: iPad Mini users: Would you switch to the bigger iPad if it's as thin as the mini? zooby iPad 54 Mar 8, 2013 03:59 AM
iPad Mini: How does the white bezel on the iPad mini compare to that of the bigger iPads? zooby iPad 16 Mar 7, 2013 10:47 PM
The iPad mini has me convinced that We Need a Bigger iPhone! KittyKatta iPhone 174 Dec 3, 2012 11:30 AM
Safar Browser replacements - Bigger Better Text on iPad Mini hyteckit iPad Apps 4 Nov 8, 2012 08:25 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC