|
|
#1 |
|
iMac 27" vs. MBP + Thunderbolt Display
I'm a graphic designer thinking of upgrading my computer. Not sure what would be better combo: imac 27" or MBP + external display like thunderbolt. Any suggestions folks?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
|
2
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Yeah, iMac seems to be a way better value. One could get the high end iMac for $1,999, add a MacBook Air and still be around the same price range as for the 15 rmbp with display. But that's just generally speaking, I'm sure there are individual cases where the rmbp makes more sense.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#5 |
|
|
3
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Quote:
Honestly, the power argument is pretty much a non-factor, unless you're doing some super high res print work, a ton of video, or a ton of vfx/rendering you're going to have more than enough horsepower with the MBP, iMac, or even a mini. Personally I have a 13" MB Aluminum (just before the 13" MBP came out) and an older iMac at home, I like having the option to be portable and I like having redundancy were I to encounter any hardware issues. The iMac is soon to be replaced, probably by a mini and a TB display. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
If portability is a key thing for you then you just answered your own question.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#8 |
|
How crucial is portability?
The iMac will have more grunt as it has better graphics. It will also work out cheaper.
__________________
iMac, Macbook Pro, iPhone, iPad, Sony Nex7 www.twitter.com/bazmeister www.flickr.com/bazzymcg/ |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I tried MBP + external display, but it wasn't great - fans kicked in now and then with a very annoying sound. It wasn't as powerful as a desktop computer, and as I wanted a somewhat powerful computer I had a 15", which, to be honest, isn't that portable. Overall, I wasn't happy with it, it had a lot of drawbacks and compromises.
Nowdays I run a 27" iMac, which is awesome for professional work. Also, I got a separate 11" Air for working on the road. It's perfect to bring to meetings, vacations, trips and such, and if I'm working a few days at another location it works great to just use an external screen. Very easy to carry around, and plenty powerful, although I wouldn't want to use it as a permanent desktop. Personally, I think the combination of iMac + Air is by far the best. |
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Would the iMac + iPad be an option for you?
I like that combo for myself personally but I am not a graphic designer |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Quote:
EDIT: just saw you preferred portability. my apologies. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Portable, and in many respects almost as good as a Pro. Many see the Air as a very weak computer, but it's actually surprisingly powerful nowadays. It's not far from a modern Pro in terms of performance, it's just lacking a few ports, some battery time and has no retina screen. Besides that there's really not much difference for a working computer. I use it while working out of the office, and love it. I'm not sure if you'd be ok with it as a graphic designer though (smaller screen, not as good color representation), but for me it's great. And it's as easy to carry around as an iPad, ie hardly noticeable in a bag.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#15 |
|
+1 iMac.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#17 |
|
There is work. There is work in pleasant environs, which is what I think that you want. And, there is inspiration. If it is true inspiration that you want, buy a Moleskin and nice pen and then hike, fly fish, backpack, put in a real cottage garden, etc; and, be ready to write. I find that true inspiration occurs when you are not working but that you are engaged enough that the front part of the brain turns off the back part. The back part you know as the deadlines, budgets, fears, etc. If you are mobile and bring your work with you, what is the point other than changing where you work?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Quote:
That beeing said, I also use it for games sometimes (WoW, Diablo 3 and similar), and the 2012 Air handles it very well. I can honestly not see anyone beeing limited by raw power for any kind of work short of 3d rendering and heavy video editing, if the Air has any limitation for a portable computer I'd say it's the screen resolution/size and battery time. As I use my iMac for stationary / CPU intensive tasks, I think the iMac + Air is a very sweet combo. I've tried iMac + iPad, but.. no, just no. You really can't do much productive work on an iPad except checking your mail/facebook/twitter. If you're actually producing something (development, graphics, documents etc) OS X is just so much better. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#19 |
|
I use Coda, etc., but not as much as Adobe CS. Programs like PS with big files really are too much for the MBA. I can't speak to the games. It's not that I don't like the MBA, it is a very light, affordable kick ass ultra-light. It is, however, not a workstation.
The iPad has even more limitations but is great to consume and to show off work. I suppose the ideal workstation/flow is the the maxed out iMac, the 15" rMBP & iPad.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#20 |
|
I can't imagine being without a laptop so I went with MBA and TBD and I love the combination. But then again my wife has an iMac 21.5 that I can use as well which rounds out the picture.
I am having a minor problem with my TBD that I will be have to address soon before warranty runs out. The external wireless USB keyboard and mouse that I have plugged into a usb drive on the TBD are not recognized unless I reboot my MBA when I connect to the TBD. Apple phone support was unable to fix and so it has to go in for diagnosis and maybe repair and replace. We'll see. Frustrating. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#21 |
|
I'm a UI designer, and I own a MacBook Air 13 (2012) and an iMac 24" — I will buy the iMac 27".
The MacBook Air is not like the first generations, now it's a really good machine, and with SSD is really fast. I've never had problems to work on that when I'm not on the iMac.
__________________
iMac 27" 2012 · MacBook Air 13" 2012 · iPhone 5 · iPad |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Quote:
The way it works for us is great. When I'm home, I usually use the MBA plugged into and using the iMac as a monitor. When I leave, any other household member has access to the iMac for use. The iMac also doubles as an available machine for encoding video or some other work you would not want to be doing on your MBA. When using the iMac as a monitor in target display mode, I use screensharing feature to connect to it from within the MBA, even while using an iMac as a display for the MBA, and interact with the desktop as necessary to continue rendering or start a new render, etc. |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Quote:
MBP 15" for 3 years. Very tempted to move to the iMac 27" for exactly what you said. I need portability for like 10% of the time, like you said for some meetings and vacations.Will order the new iMac
__________________
2.6 GHz MBP, 4 GB RAM, 8600GT 512 iPhone 5 Apple TVDoing Web Dev and SEO/UX for a living www.samuellavoie.com |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 PM.







The iPad has even more limitations but is great to consume and to show off work. I suppose the ideal workstation/flow is the the maxed out iMac, the 15" rMBP & iPad.

MBP 15" for 3 years. Very tempted to move to the iMac 27" for exactly what you said. I need portability for like 10% of the time, like you said for some meetings and vacations.
Linear Mode
