Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPad

View Poll Results: If both devices had launched together, would you have gotten an iPad 3 or iPad mini?
iPad mini 46 52.27%
iPad 3 36 40.91%
No opinion, I just want to vote in this poll 6 6.82%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 20, 2012, 02:31 PM   #1
ThatsMeRight
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Would you have bought an iPad mini instead of an iPad 3, if it had launched in March?

So, I was wondering: who here would have bought an iPad mini instead of an iPad 3, if the iPad mini had launched along with the iPad 3?
ThatsMeRight is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 20, 2012, 02:34 PM   #2
jabingla2810
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Definitely.
__________________
2.4 Alu Macbook 2GB 250GB
jabingla2810 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 20, 2012, 02:35 PM   #3
Anti-Lucifer
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
All it took was one hour at the kiosk in the store jumping around from iPad mini to ipad 3 and 4 - I left with a mini.

During the presentation of the mini, I was actually very underwhelmed because being use to a retina ipad 3, I would not of thunk I would choose a mini over a retina ipad.

But guess what, after having extensive use of the mini, my initial decision to get the mini over an ipad (4) is still justified. The size and fit and finish and the way you can hold it and hold it without much effort plus being able to hold it a distance I like (further away), the screen display resolution really doesn't matter to me vs a retina. Sure I would love to see retina in a mini form factor, but I don't make apple gadgets...and no competitor has the same quality package on sale.

My point is I'd have to see both in person to judge. On paper, even retina sounds like nothing more than a resolution figure.
Anti-Lucifer is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 20, 2012, 02:49 PM   #4
aross99
macrumors 68000
 
aross99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: East Lansing, MI
For me the physically bigger screen size is what I need. Even when the Mini has a retina display, it's just too small for me.

I love the lighter weight of the Mini, but for my use, the larger size of the iPad 3 is a major plus...
aross99 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 20, 2012, 02:53 PM   #5
ThatsMeRight
Thread Starter
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anti-Lucifer View Post
All it took was one hour at the kiosk in the store jumping around from iPad mini to ipad 3 and 4 - I left with a mini.

During the presentation of the mini, I was actually very underwhelmed because being use to a retina ipad 3, I would not of thunk I would choose a mini over a retina ipad.

But guess what, after having extensive use of the mini, my initial decision to get the mini over an ipad (4) is still justified. The size and fit and finish and the way you can hold it and hold it without much effort plus being able to hold it a distance I like (further away), the screen display resolution really doesn't matter to me vs a retina. Sure I would love to see retina on a mini form factor, but I don't make apple gadgets...and no competitor has the same quality package on sale.
Well, I bought an iPad 3 in March and I think I would have bought an iPad mini if it had been launched alongside the iPad 3.

I was not particularly impressed with the iPad mini when I saw the presentation, but when I had the chance to use it for a while I absolutely loved it. It was light, thin and it actually felt like a 'real iPad' in a much, much smaller package (the smaller bezels on the side certainly helped with that).

I even feel like like the iPad mini is much better than the iPad 3, except for the display. It's got faster Wi-Fi, it's got more cellular (both improved 2G and 4G LTE over here), it's got the Lightning connector (so future proof), it's got FaceTime HD, it's got stereo speakers, it's got a new design and it's so much smaller, yet not too small.

Heck, I feel that in almost every way the iPad mini is an upgrade except for the display (which is, obviously, a step back). And even than I feel like the display is really not that bad. It is of higher quality than that of the iPad 2. Heck, even animations were slightly smoother. Just think about it: the iPad 3 is twice as powerful as an iPad mini, but it has to push four times as many pixels... so, relatively, the iPad 3's only got 0.5x the GPU power of an iPad mini.

Needless to say, I won't sell my iPad 3 and get an iPad mini. It's too soon and I'm not spending that much money at once. Next year, however, I might settle for the second generation iPad mini which I'll expect to get:

- 2048 x 1536 resolution display, 326 ppi (higher than that of the iPad 3/4)
- A5X, A6 or A6X chip* and 1 GB of RAM

And that's it. At that point, it is already equal with an iPad 4. Some might argue that next year is too soon for an iPad mini with Retina display, but I think it is possible. Starting from this quarter, IGZO technology becomes available. It adds little to no cost for Apple, but it allows Apple to put a Retina display in the iPad mini without any compromises. It doesn't add any thickness, it's more energy-efficient, it only requires 50% of the LED backlighting (so even more energy-efficient) and thus it doesn't require a large battery (like the iPad 3/4). Basically, they could add a Retina display to the iPad mini next year with little extra cost.

* Let's talk about the second generation iPad mini's chip
As I said, I expect either an A5X, A6 or A6X chip. A5X chip is the worst case scenario: it uses a lot of energy, and it is only twice as powerful (while it needs to push four times as many pixels). CPU performance doesn't increase.

A6 chip. Not the worst scenario, but not the best either. We're talking here about a triple-core GPU, but because the GPU runs at higher clock speeds the A6 chip is graphically still as fast as an A5X chip. CPU wise, we'll go forward: at least twice the performance.

A6X chip. This is the best possibility: we'll get a much faster CPU (like we do with the A6 chip) and we get a GPU that is four times as powerful. This means the GPU will be able to run the 2048 x 1536 display just as smoothly, if not better, as the previous generation ran the 1024 x 768 display.

A5X seems unlikely to me: it's only been in production for the iPad 3 and as we all know the iPad 3 has been killed off. It would be much more logical to get some A6 chips or A6X chips (since it's likely that those chips will be in production for at least the next two years).

A6 chip seems like a good compromise, while the A6X chip is just the best option.

-----------------------------------------------------
That was my huge wall of text. Anyway, if they give the iPad mini a Retina display and A6X chip than I'll very likely upgrade from my iPad 3 - and in that case it's going to be a big upgrade:

- FaceTime HD
- Faster Wi-Fi
- Faster Cellular
- Faster GPU
- Faster CPU
- 326 ppi display (up from 264 ppi)
- Stereo speakers
- New design that's also thinner and lighter
- Lightning connector

Any extra features will be a bonus.

Last edited by ThatsMeRight; Nov 20, 2012 at 02:58 PM.
ThatsMeRight is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 20, 2012, 05:58 PM   #6
smooth
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Detroit
Send a message via Yahoo to smooth
I absolutely would have. My iPad serves mainly as my book and photo library. If I had even heard a couple of the early rumors, I would have held off and waited for it.
__________________
Late 2013 13" Retina MacBook Pro
iPad 3
iPhone 5
iPod Shuffle
smooth is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 02:19 PM   #7
dancj
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
iPad 3 for me.

I prefer the size and retina display is a deal breaker.

Last edited by dancj; Nov 22, 2012 at 04:02 PM.
dancj is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 02:49 PM   #8
foiden
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
iPad 3. For my uses, the screensize and the resolution is the deal maker. I use it as an electronic music reader on my music stand, during practice and performance. The Retina display is exactly what makes a 9.7" screen of piano music highly readable.
foiden is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 02:53 PM   #9
Appl3FTW
macrumors 68000
 
Appl3FTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
are you kidding me? hell yea... iPad mini is like the mythical unicorn of apple for the longest.
Appl3FTW is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 02:59 PM   #10
imlovinit
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Ipad 3. All the way.
__________________
Enough products to keep me distracted.
imlovinit is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 03:00 PM   #11
WesCole
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
The retina display won me over. Now, if the Mini would've launched with a retina display, too, it would be hard to resist.
__________________
2010 15" MacBook Pro, Anti-Glare Hi-Res, 2.4 i5 128 GB SSD & 500GB HDD in optibay; iPhone 5 32GB; ATV3; 2011 Core i7 27" iMac 2GB VRAM; "New" iPad 32GB AT&T 4G; 2012 MacBook Air 13", i7, 8GB, 256GB
WesCole is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 10:53 PM   #12
PracticalMac
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Wanted smaller iPad before the 3 came out.

If I knew the mini was coming out in November, would have waited.
__________________
FireWire 1394 Intelligent network guaranteed data transfer, 1500mA power, Ethernet compatible
Read: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 70% faster then USB2
Write: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 48% faster
PracticalMac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2012, 02:42 AM   #13
alphaod
macrumors Core
 
alphaod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 上海 (Shanghai)
Seeing I own both now and I like the iPad mini a lot more, I definitely would have gotten the iPad mini over the iPad 3.
__________________
Mac Pro | iMac | Mac mini | MacBook Pro | MacBook Air | iPad | iPhone | iPod
alphaod is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2012, 10:09 AM   #14
Night Spring
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
This poll needs an option for "would have bought both." I'm pretty sure that's what I would have done. I bought the iPad 3 when it came out, then I bought the mini LTE when that came out, and now I'm using both. I like the mini for carrying outside the house, and for reading ebooks and Instapaper. For everything else, including web browsing, Pages, Zite, Flipboard, RSS reader, etc, I prefer the iPad 3. It does feel a bit extravagant to have both, but at this point, I'm reluctant to give up either, though if forced to pick one, I'd go with iPad 3.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatsMeRight View Post
I even feel like like the iPad mini is much better than the iPad 3, except for the display. It's got faster Wi-Fi, it's got more cellular (both improved 2G and 4G LTE over here), it's got the Lightning connector (so future proof), it's got FaceTime HD, it's got stereo speakers, it's got a new design and it's so much smaller, yet not too small.
But if the mini was released in March, it's likely it wouldn't have had a lot of those features. The Lightning connector and the new back design were developed to be released on the iPhone 5, and probably weren't ready to be released in March. And if the new LTE chip and faster wifi had been ready in March, then the iPad 3 would have been released with them, too.

Last edited by Night Spring; Nov 25, 2012 at 10:21 AM.
Night Spring is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2012, 01:48 PM   #15
MrXiro
macrumors 68020
 
MrXiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatsMeRight View Post
So, I was wondering: who here would have bought an iPad mini instead of an iPad 3, if the iPad mini had launched along with the iPad 3?
Yes. In retrospect I would even go as far as to say I regret my iPad 3 purchase. I had an iPad 2 at the time and it was an unnecessary purchase as it doesn't do anything better than an iPad 2 other than make text look crisper. Which is something I never had an issue with.

The mini on the other hand is fresh, new, fantastically designed and a real "upgrade" to the iPad family. I do wish apple would allow default font size changes in safari though. It would solve the problems of many people who have a problem with it.
MrXiro is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2012, 02:00 PM   #16
aneftp
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Seeing the iPad mini in the store (I owned iPad 2 and iPad 3).

After seeing iPad mini (I had it delivered to my house that same day via fed ex pre ordered).

It made me want to go and head straight to target and pick up iPad 4 sell my iPad 2 (I am keeping iPad 3).

You look at the screen all day and iPad mini screen was not on par. Weight isn't an issue to me with iPad. I had griffithi military case and that doesn't bother me.

So the answer is no. iPad mini version one is a no go. iPad 3/4 all the way.
aneftp is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2012, 02:01 PM   #17
Compile 'em all
macrumors 601
 
Compile 'em all's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatsMeRight View Post
So, I was wondering: who here would have bought an iPad mini instead of an iPad 3, if the iPad mini had launched along with the iPad 3?
No retina, no sale.
__________________
Compile 'em all is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2012, 02:16 PM   #18
Max(IT)
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Italy
Now or one year ago, the Mini is cute but I need a bigger screen ...
__________________
Mac Mini - Macbook Pro 15" - MacBook Air 11"
Nexus 7 - 32Gb
iPhone 5S 16Gb - iPad Air 16Gb
Nokia Lumia 1520 - 32Gb
Max(IT) is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 01:50 PM   #19
ThatsMeRight
Thread Starter
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max(IT) View Post
Now or one year ago, the Mini is cute but I need a bigger screen ...
Haha, I like this. So you wouldn't be interested in an iPad mini at all?
ThatsMeRight is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2012, 08:11 AM   #20
Max(IT)
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Italy
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatsMeRight View Post
Haha, I like this. So you wouldn't be interested in an iPad mini at all?
Yep.
For my needs a 7" tablet is too small.
My perfect combination is a 15" notebook, a 9.7" tablet and a 4" smartphone.

Right now I'm stick with an iPhone 4s because the iPhone 5 is definitely too expensive here in Italy, and I've just bought an iPad 4.
__________________
Mac Mini - Macbook Pro 15" - MacBook Air 11"
Nexus 7 - 32Gb
iPhone 5S 16Gb - iPad Air 16Gb
Nokia Lumia 1520 - 32Gb
Max(IT) is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2012, 08:48 AM   #21
AdonisSMU
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Absolutely!
AdonisSMU is online now   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPad

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Next-Generation iPad and iPad Mini Rumored for March Launch MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 565 Feb 26, 2013 05:52 PM
iPad Mini: Anyone returning their iPad mini they bought this week bcuz of mini 2? richpuer iPad 49 Jan 14, 2013 07:33 PM
iPad Mini: Ipad mini retina already in March? kristoffer4 iPad 16 Dec 26, 2012 01:29 PM
iPad Mini: Bought iPad mini, now iPad 3 sits ScottNWDW iPad 33 Nov 19, 2012 09:24 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC