Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 21, 2012, 05:22 AM   #1
burningbright
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
For Lightroom: Dual-Core + SSD or Quad with HDD?

Hi, I'm planning on getting a Mac Mini, mostly for Lightroom, and wondered if Lightroom would perform better on the base dual-core upgraded with an SSD or on the 2.3 quad-core with the stock HDD?
Thanks for any info!
burningbright is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 06:42 AM   #2
mjoshi123
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by burningbright View Post
Hi, I'm planning on getting a Mac Mini, mostly for Lightroom, and wondered if Lightroom would perform better on the base dual-core upgraded with an SSD or on the 2.3 quad-core with the stock HDD?
Thanks for any info!
I use my mini primarily with Lr + CS6, definetly go with Quade core with HDD, I've dual core with SSD on my MBP and it is nowhere as fast as i7 2.3 + HDD on my Mac mini. Make sure you upgrade ram to 16GB.
__________________
My gadgets -
Sony Vaio FW290 CTO, Dell XPS M1330, MBP 13 2.4GHz 2010, iPod Touch 64Gb/8GB, Zune 32GB, HTC Touch Pro-2, Palm Pre (My Favoraite device), Dell Mini 9 Hackintosh
mjoshi123 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 09:29 AM   #3
burningbright
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Perfect! Thanks Mjoshi, that was, of course, just the kind of information I was looking for. One quad-core Mini with monstrous quantities of RAM coming up!
burningbright is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 10:40 AM   #4
MattZani
macrumors 68020
 
MattZani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Weymouth, UK
For LR work, CPU and RAM are more important than SSD, all SSD will do really is load the application a little faster.

LR4 opens in about 2-3 seconds on my 2.6 i7 Quad with 16Gb RAM.
__________________
Matthew Dear Photography
Automotive & Documentary Photographer
MattZani is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 11:18 AM   #5
RobL2112
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Hamburg, NY
Quad Core

I recently upgraded from a 2007 iMac to the latest Mini... wanted to bring my own monitor and didn't want to wait for the iMac's any longer.

I do a lot of work in LR 4 and the system I put together works fantastic...

2012 MacMini with Quad Core i7
16Gb RAM (self upgraded from OWC)
256Gb SSD (factory)
4.0Tb External USB 3.0 "MiniStack" from OWC
ViewSonic VP2770-LED 27" monitor

With the OS, LR 4, and the Nik plugins on the SSD and my pictures on the External USB, the system flies... I find the performance of the USB 3 external drive equally as good the internal I had on my iMac, which was sufficient. I know one of the knocks on USB is the CPU load it introduces, but I experience no lag because of that... the CPU has plenty to give!

Hope this helps in your decision making process...

--Rob.
RobL2112 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 01:09 PM   #6
mjoshi123
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by burningbright View Post
Perfect! Thanks Mjoshi, that was, of course, just the kind of information I was looking for. One quad-core Mini with monstrous quantities of RAM coming up!
Corsair vengence 16GB RAM is on sale on Newegg and Amazone so make sure you get those, it works just fine in my 2012 mac mini with i7

here is link from Amazon http://www.amazon.com/Corsair-Vengea...vengeance+16gb

and if you are itching for SSD upgrade please dont get it from Apple, it is not at all hard thing to do it on your own. There is video on youtube showing exactly it needs to be done. Just see same video 2-3 times and you will be pretty confident to do it on your own.
__________________
My gadgets -
Sony Vaio FW290 CTO, Dell XPS M1330, MBP 13 2.4GHz 2010, iPod Touch 64Gb/8GB, Zune 32GB, HTC Touch Pro-2, Palm Pre (My Favoraite device), Dell Mini 9 Hackintosh
mjoshi123 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 01:49 PM   #7
Carl Spackler
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Outer Space
Quote:
Originally Posted by burningbright View Post
Hi, I'm planning on getting a Mac Mini, mostly for Lightroom, and wondered if Lightroom would perform better on the base dual-core upgraded with an SSD or on the 2.3 quad-core with the stock HDD?
Thanks for any info!
I used the latest LR with the upgraded quad, 16GB RAM (Corsair Vengence) and Apple's SSD. It's a super-duper quick machine. SSD is superfast and I had no qualms about paying Apple's inflated SSD price for not having to meddle too much in the machine.
Carl Spackler is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 03:29 PM   #8
dazey
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
buy the quad core as it gives you an upgrade path to add the SSD. Just put a second drive in it when you are ready.
dazey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 02:12 PM   #9
jimmy83
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by dazey View Post
buy the quad core as it gives you an upgrade path to add the SSD. Just put a second drive in it when you are ready.
Can you not upgrade the HDD in the base model?
jimmy83 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 03:15 PM   #10
Mojo1
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmy83 View Post
Can you not upgrade the HDD in the base model?
Apple doesn't offer upgrades but you can certainly do it yourself.
Mojo1 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 07:03 PM   #11
drew.bowser
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Missouri
What improvements would you prefer 1 - program responsiveness or 2 - export render speeds?

I have several macs running LR and Photoshop. The ssd is a great upgrade for speeding up the program , althought it doesn't speed up the file handling unless the files are on an ssd. CPU upgrades will make a huge difference on render times. My MacBook Air with 4gb of ram i5 1.8 handles files just as fast as my 2011 imac with 16gb of ram - although the imac exports files a little bit faster...
drew.bowser is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Real world difference between dual-core 13" rMBP and my quad-core iMac PatriotInvasion MacBook Pro 8 Apr 1, 2013 02:00 PM
Mac Mini (2012) Dual Core vs Quad Core as a media center CeratixD Buying Tips and Advice 14 Feb 20, 2013 12:32 AM
2012 i5 Dual core Base or 2011 i7 Quad Core server? kenfused Mac mini 3 Dec 12, 2012 01:45 PM
Performance difference between Dual core i7 in 2012 MBP 13 v/s Quad Core 2011 iMac i5 mjoshi123 MacBook Pro 3 Sep 14, 2012 02:11 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC