|
|
#1 |
|
New GPU Benchmarks for OS X!
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Good or Bad?
Mvc gtx 570 2.5gb
__________________
2010 Mac Pro | 2 x 2.40 GHz| 24Gb RAM | 3x2TB RAID0 | GTX 570 | 27" ALCD | iPad 2 16Gb wifi+3G | iPhone 4S 32Gb Unlocked | |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
5850, 6870 and GTX 570 in MP 1,1 and 3,1.
Run these tests in similar to their reference resolution and without AA. We'll get more comparable results. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Gtx 660, MACPRO 5,1
__________________
Mac Pro 5,1 - 6-core 3.33 GHZ, 16 GB Ram, GTX 660 2 GB, 256GB SSD, 2 TB HDD Last edited by markupstart; Dec 8, 2012 at 04:43 PM. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Is this a good score off of my 480 GTX? I'm going to try the 580 GTX next...
__________________
THE HACKINBEAST = Mac OS X 10.7.2/EVGA SR-2/2xX5690's/XFX 6870 2GB GPU/48GB Mushkin 2000MHz RAM LEPA G1600 PSU/Silverstone TJ11 Case/Geekbench: 36,918/Cinebench 11.5: OpenGL: 50.65 fps, CPU: 22.55 |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Quote:
![]() ---------- Quote:
Once I put on my EK waterblock then I'll test it again...
__________________
THE HACKINBEAST = Mac OS X 10.7.2/EVGA SR-2/2xX5690's/XFX 6870 2GB GPU/48GB Mushkin 2000MHz RAM LEPA G1600 PSU/Silverstone TJ11 Case/Geekbench: 36,918/Cinebench 11.5: OpenGL: 50.65 fps, CPU: 22.55 |
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
THE HACKINBEAST = Mac OS X 10.7.2/EVGA SR-2/2xX5690's/XFX 6870 2GB GPU/48GB Mushkin 2000MHz RAM LEPA G1600 PSU/Silverstone TJ11 Case/Geekbench: 36,918/Cinebench 11.5: OpenGL: 50.65 fps, CPU: 22.55 |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Quote:
Cinebench is a CPU test and this thread is about some specific new GPU benchmark. Could you please remove these posts? Or just run the linked test and post those results as well. If you want to start another thread using the tests you like, nobody would mind that either. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
THE HACKINBEAST = Mac OS X 10.7.2/EVGA SR-2/2xX5690's/XFX 6870 2GB GPU/48GB Mushkin 2000MHz RAM LEPA G1600 PSU/Silverstone TJ11 Case/Geekbench: 36,918/Cinebench 11.5: OpenGL: 50.65 fps, CPU: 22.55 |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
THE HACKINBEAST = Mac OS X 10.7.2/EVGA SR-2/2xX5690's/XFX 6870 2GB GPU/48GB Mushkin 2000MHz RAM LEPA G1600 PSU/Silverstone TJ11 Case/Geekbench: 36,918/Cinebench 11.5: OpenGL: 50.65 fps, CPU: 22.55 |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
I'm not aware that I got them mixed up.
Quote:
Done it. That's what I had done, i.e., I ran all three linked tests, posted the test results of all three of them here, but I had also included in the same post with those three test results, other system performance results and information on the system as a whole because other system tweaks affect CUDA performance. Done it and cleaned up my posts here. Good Bye.
__________________
CUDA Rigs: 8XTitan/6G; 4XGTX680/4G; 4XGTX580/3G; 2XGTX580/3G; 4XGTX480/1.5G; 3XGTX295/1.8G; WolfPackPrime0-1xGTX690/4G, 4-4650s, CB11.5 xCPU-48.5; http://browse.geekbench.ca/user/Tutor/geekbench2 Last edited by Tutor; Dec 8, 2012 at 10:56 PM. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Here's the Gigabyte NVidia GeForce GTX 670 w/ 2GB RAM
__________________
Too many cameras! |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 |
|
I'm such a newb I dont even know how to post properly! lol
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Here is the GTX 670 FTW that I just installed tonight.
__________________
13" MacBook Pro, Intel Core i5, 320GB, 8GB RAM, Lion Server Home PC Windows 7, AMD 64 X2 6000, 6GB, 8600GT, ASUS 26" LCD x2 Time Capsule 2TB 4th Gen, Apple TV 2nd Gen, iPod Touch 8GB, iPod Nano 8GB |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Just got the Asus PB 278 monitor. When I set the test drop down to 1920x1200 it comes out 2560x1440 which is max res on the Asus. 1920x1200 was the max res on my previous Dell so I guess it just defaults to max?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#17 |
|
The 670's are all over the place.
__________________
Mac Pro W3680, GTX 680, 12GB DDR3, SSD; MBP, 2.6GHz Core i7, 16GB DDR3, SSD; Eizo fs2333 |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Here's my scores with a palit sonic platinum 570 1280MB. Bummer my plans on going 680 SLI(windows) was thwarted
__________________
╔═════╦═════╦═════╗
╚═════╩═════╩═════╝ Last edited by OrangeSVTguy; Dec 24, 2012 at 11:22 PM. Reason: added 670 results |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#19 |
|
^^^Orange, try with AA off, as most of users and original testers.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Especially over, what is for me a joyous holiday season {especially since the world as we know it didn't end on 12/12/12 or 12/21/12}, I 'll be devoting my free moments to studying how to get the optimum level of performance from the GPU in many differing configurations. For over 58 years, i.e., since I began to speak, I have been a child of the "Why?" and it almost drove my parents and teachers loony. During college football season, different college bands pump out different cadences that drive their marching bands to evoke different passions in the crowds. That synergy is why I love to watch FAMU (Florida A&M University)'s marching band more than most others. I believe that your observation here arises from those synergies. A GPU isn't the band, but rather is part of a larger unit in which other system components can add and/or detract from the performance, e.g., the numbers we witness being output by the "New GPU Benchmark" app. Different 670s, just as is the case for every other model/generation, may have differing memory sizes and different memory and core speeds connected to differing busses (and potentially tweaked ones) affected by differing configurations, etc. that affect the benchmark outcome. That is why I believe that it is important for the testers to give as much information as is possible about the total system in which their GPU card sits so that I, as well as any other individual who cares about the "Why?", can get as full of an understanding as is possible (and hopefully figure out why and let the others of us know) about why that 670 out performs another, or what makes that 580 "better" at a particular benchmark than another 580. Knowing the "why" is essential to replication and adding to the body of knowledge that I believe some of us seek to tap. Since MacVidCards has indicated to me that he does not intend for this thread is to be a repository of that kind of knowledge, anyone who cares to learn more about why the scores are what they are or how to score higher or what may be holding back their GPU's performance may, after posting their "New GPU Benchmark" results here, bounce to my thread, "All We Know About Maximizing CPU Related Performance" [ http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1333421 ] {beginning at post #435} where I will provide updates focusing on the GPU/system synergies, and you may post more system-related information with various GPU and related CPU benchmark scores and/or questions/comments to broaden this body of knowledge.
__________________
CUDA Rigs: 8XTitan/6G; 4XGTX680/4G; 4XGTX580/3G; 2XGTX580/3G; 4XGTX480/1.5G; 3XGTX295/1.8G; WolfPackPrime0-1xGTX690/4G, 4-4650s, CB11.5 xCPU-48.5; http://browse.geekbench.ca/user/Tutor/geekbench2 |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#21 |
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Your tests results without AA confirmed that this test isn't CPU bound. My 570 scored (almost) exactly that same using that same settings on different machine and OS (i.e. different drivers revision). My card was Gainward GTX 570 1280MB.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Zotac GTX670 REFERENCE 2GB Benchmarks:
![]()
__________________
Mac Pro 4,1 - 2.66GHz QC, 16GB Server RAM, 2X GT120, AGILITY 4 128GB, 4TB WD Black, 3x 2TB WD Green, External 640GB, 4x 24" 1080p in Portrait - GeekBench 9463 |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Cool. I know the Sonic 570 is slightly overclocked from the factory and a lot of reviews has it almost the same benchmarks as a 580. It also has 8pin and 6pin for power unlock the other 570s with 2 6pin.
__________________
╔═════╦═════╦═════╗
╚═════╩═════╩═════╝ |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Well can't wait to test this setup in windows. I'll do a single bench test in OSX since the 670s are all over the place.
__________________
╔═════╦═════╦═════╗
╚═════╩═════╩═════╝ |
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 AM.









Once I put on my EK waterblock then I'll test it again...

Linear Mode
