Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 1, 2012, 04:26 PM   #1
MadTester
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Low-Mid range 'zoom' lens f/2.8?

Hi All,

I'll probably get alot of stick for asking this question but I have done much research on the web but I still have doubts over which lens to get (apart from leaning towards Tamron solely for the price).......

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 (nikon fit) or the " equivalent" Tamron 24-75mm... I like outdoor photography and have the sigma 120-400mm (monster) literally permanently attached to one of my nikons....

I would however like something a little more portable and more responsive in low light.... anyone here use either or both these lenses and what are your experiences with them?

Any advice would be great... thanks in advance
__________________
I know what I like and I like what I know...17" Aluminium MacBookPro MountainLion, 8Gb RAM, 320 GB HD, Mac Mini Lion Server 16gb RAM, 1TB HD, Work Unibody MacBookPro 15" 2011 OSX Lion, i7 quad
MadTester is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2012, 04:43 PM   #2
Designer Dale
macrumors 68040
 
Designer Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Folding space
I have both of the lenses you mentioned in Canon mount. The 120-400 is my bird lens and the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 is my daily shooter. Nice and sharp lens that's good in low light but not as good as a 1.4. The Tamron is now available with their version of image stabilization (VC). Mine is not stabilized but I don't really miss it at the 28-75 focal range. I love the IS on the Sigma, but then I need it at 400.

Dale
__________________
How to Post, Quote and Multi-Quote Photos - My Google Docs Folder 12/2011
I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message.
Designer Dale is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2012, 05:09 PM   #3
compuwar
macrumors 601
 
compuwar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern/Central VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadTester View Post

Any advice would be great... thanks in advance
Get the 50mm f/1.8, it's relatively inexpensive and faster- if you're on APS-C then the 35mm f/1.8 DX.

Paul
__________________
PaulDRobertson.net Have I been helpful? How about a print for your wall? US, UK and CA fine art sales!
compuwar is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2012, 09:38 PM   #4
Prodo123
macrumors 68020
 
Prodo123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadTester View Post
Hi All,

I'll probably get alot of stick for asking this question but I have done much research on the web but I still have doubts over which lens to get (apart from leaning towards Tamron solely for the price).......

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 (nikon fit) or the " equivalent" Tamron 24-75mm... I like outdoor photography and have the sigma 120-400mm (monster) literally permanently attached to one of my nikons....

I would however like something a little more portable and more responsive in low light.... anyone here use either or both these lenses and what are your experiences with them?

Any advice would be great... thanks in advance
I haven't used the Sigma 24-70mm but I do have Canon's 24-70 f/2.8. It's a superb lens for low light photography, along with the rest of the f/2.8 lineup in Canon's list.
But I do know that Sigma, Tamron and other third-party lenses fall short in image quality when compared to Canon/Nikon's offerings.
The Sigma gets heavy vignetting and distortion at the wide end. It has decent center sharpness but the Nikkor glass clearly outperforms it.
Tamron performs marginally better in distortion and vignetting, but in the middle of the zoom range the sharpness drops according to Photozone's testing. Again, the Nikkor is simply better.

Have you thought about the new Tamron 24-70mm VC? It has comparable image quality and even has vibration reduction for better lowlight performance.
__________________
MacBook Pro 15" 2.2Ghz hi-res glossy, 16GB RAM, Logitech G700, Das Keyboard, Seagate Momentus XT 750GB iPhone 5 White 32GB Audiophile Photographer, videographer, audio engineer
Prodo123 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2012, 12:27 AM   #5
Policar
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
I've used the Tamron a bit. It's not bad. But it's not great. Corners are less than ideal.

If you're on APS-C do yourself a favor and get a 17-55mm (or similar) lens instead. And then a fast 85mm for portraiture.

But I agree: if you're shooting APS-C (DX) get the 35mm f1.8; if you're shooting FF get the 50mm f1.8, which is more expensive but also better than the Canon equivalent (which is basically all I use for stills, despite owning lots of good lenses). Even if it's in addition to a mid-range zoom.

The 35mm f1.4 lenses are also just super nice on FF.
Policar is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2012, 07:18 AM   #6
MadTester
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Hey all,

Thanks for the replies... seems like it's down to 28-75 tamron or the 35mm nikon...

My only concern is that I have 2 bodies.. D50 and a D3000 (of which the latter I am wanting to replace with a D600 when I can afford it!!)... I might see if i can hire both lenses for a day or 2 and then make a decision as to which I prefer as the lenses will be used on my D50(for now).

Thanks again
__________________
I know what I like and I like what I know...17" Aluminium MacBookPro MountainLion, 8Gb RAM, 320 GB HD, Mac Mini Lion Server 16gb RAM, 1TB HD, Work Unibody MacBookPro 15" 2011 OSX Lion, i7 quad
MadTester is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2012, 11:42 AM   #7
ChrisA
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadTester View Post
Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 (nikon fit) or the " equivalent" Tamron 24-75mm... I like outdoor photography and have the sigma 120-400mm (monster) literally permanently attached to one of my nikons....
For indoors try a 50mm f/1.4. With your budget you can afford it. Or if you need the wider angle of view get the 35mm f/1.8

For this kind of photography you never really need a zoom lens because indoors you can always walk forward or back to frame the shot. And you will find the f/1.4 is MUCH better then f/2.8 After all it is TWO f-stops faster This allows a 4X shorter shutter speed that means you'd be at 1/60 with the f/1.4 lens and get sharp images but with the zoom you'd be at 1/15 and could not even get the shot.

Yes do go for the f/1.4 if you can rther then the f/1.8 unless you are really short of cash or need the wider 35mm
ChrisA is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 2012, 12:44 PM   #8
MadTester
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisA View Post
For indoors try a 50mm f/1.4. With your budget you can afford it. Or if you need the wider angle of view get the 35mm f/1.8

For this kind of photography you never really need a zoom lens because indoors you can always walk forward or back to frame the shot. And you will find the f/1.4 is MUCH better then f/2.8 After all it is TWO f-stops faster This allows a 4X shorter shutter speed that means you'd be at 1/60 with the f/1.4 lens and get sharp images but with the zoom you'd be at 1/15 and could not even get the shot.

Yes do go for the f/1.4 if you can rther then the f/1.8 unless you are really short of cash or need the wider 35mm
Well... I have made the decision after much reading... and have tried both 1.4 and 1.8 50mm.... personally?... the 1.8 i feel is a nicer lens, quicker autofocus than the 1.4.... But still .. I'm harbouring a love for the 24-70mm 2.8... soooo I now have a prime and I'm putiing away a few more pennies for the 24-70mm

Thanks to all for your pointer, advice and general helpful opinions ....
__________________
I know what I like and I like what I know...17" Aluminium MacBookPro MountainLion, 8Gb RAM, 320 GB HD, Mac Mini Lion Server 16gb RAM, 1TB HD, Work Unibody MacBookPro 15" 2011 OSX Lion, i7 quad
MadTester is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC