|
|
#1 |
|
Video editing - iMac vs. MPB vs. mini
Hey all--
I do heavy video editing using premiere and after effects. At the moment I'm barely pushing through any actual editing on a late 2008 MacBook Pro. I'm able to do some editing on it, but usually have to bring it to my late 2009 iMac to actually render it. In a battle of pros and cons, I've come to a halting decision that I'm sure many of you have experienced. Do I sacrifice portability for power? I'm not terribly crazy about portability, and in the case I go for the iMac or mini, I would be toting it around 2-3 times a week in a pelican case. I've always been a fan of the iMac and mbp, and have no experience with the mini. Is there anything in it that gives me an advantage over an iMac, after I've upgraded everything and included the 27" TB display? I feel that the new mpb, despite its infinite power over my mpb and iMac combined, won't give me as much as I'm looking for, which would be satisfied with the soon-to-come (hopefully) iMac. Can anyone give me some insight? |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Quote:
You said that you would be moving around 2-3 times per week. I'd go for the MBP or MBPR for sure. Its like essentially a mac mini with a better mobile graphics card and a nice screen. It would do every thing you need and you could get it now. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Thanks -- but portability put aside, do you think the new iMac will provide a significant difference as far as power compared to the mbp?
I mean the obvious answer is yes, but will the difference be significant enough to give up portability? |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"...heavy video editing..." = Mac Pro.
Last time I looked the iMac got very low scores on the portability front. |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#5 |
|
On the portability front, I'm not concerned. I can deal with it. But it does need to be somewhat portable, and the Mac Pro won't be at all, at least compared to the iMac.
Not to mention, Mac Pro is a little far for my budget... |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
A refurb Quad Core Mac Pro can be had for around $1800 from Apple.
If you have ever touched the top of an iMac doing "heavy" rendering you will have doubts about its longevity. The expandability of the Mac Pro is impressive and the cooling is unsurpassed. I'd give it some more thought if you can get past the portability issue. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Will do! Thank you for your advice!
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 |
|
I agree with the Mac Pro suggestion. When I did a lot of heavy video editing, my Mac Pro was king. When I had a 27 iMac doing the same tasks, it was way more time consuming. My iMac also ran REALLY hot during some of this which led to some of that greying / ghosting on the screen long term.
__________________
2012 Mac Mini; i7 2TB HDD 8GB 2012 MacBook Pro Retina 15" 2.3 i7 256GB 8GB 2012 MacBook Air 13" i5 128GB 4GB iPad Mini: 32 GB Black - iPhone 5: 32GB Black |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Or try ebay. There are some great mac pros out there. And the expandability is unsurpassed.
__________________
*GUIDE* High resolution Youtube videos and Safari. Early 2011 MacBook Pro 17" with antiglare & iPhone 4s 32GB SprintPS3 & PS Vita |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Would any of you see a reason in going for an iMac as an all around computer, just to have the slight edge of somewhat-portability, or are most of you straight up Mac Pro fans?
|
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.







Early 2011 MacBook Pro 17" with antiglare & iPhone 4s 32GB Sprint
Linear Mode
