Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 27, 2012, 03:50 PM   #1
NJRonbo
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Who is opting for the $1300 Full SSD drive on the 2013 iMac?

I am. Not overly proud to say it, but I am getting the 27" iMac with full SSD capability.

Anybody else?

(Don't answer all at once)
NJRonbo is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 03:54 PM   #2
grandvvazoo
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJRonbo View Post
I am. Not overly proud to say it, but I am getting the 27" iMac with full SSD capability.

Anybody else?

(Don't answer all at once)
seriously considering it... unless I read sometime soon about the ease of upgrading myself (but I don't hold out much hope for that possibility)
grandvvazoo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 04:05 PM   #3
Mac2133
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJRonbo View Post
I am. Not overly proud to say it, but I am getting the 27" iMac with full SSD capability.

Anybody else?

(Don't answer all at once)
You heard on the news today, right? The Powerball Jackpot has just exceeded $500 million...
Mac2133 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 04:06 PM   #4
sdo1982
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Vancouver
Considering it also, I'm waiting on ifixit first, if I can easily pop in a 512 ssd then I will order a fusion and then clone the hdd, voila, fusion of 640gb.
If its a real pain to open up then ill splash the cash.
sdo1982 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 04:06 PM   #5
xgman
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Wish there was a 512 option.
__________________
{2014 27" r-imac-4.0i7-295x-32gb ram-1TBSSD+External TB enclosure>Samsung840evo ssd + Segate Enterprise 5TB-UAD Apollo/Marantz/Amphion/Bowers&Wilkins Sound-Nektar P1 61}
{ipads}{iphones}{LG G3}
xgman is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 04:09 PM   #6
flynz4
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Has the $1300 price been announced? I haven't seen it.

I will be getting the full SSD model. My prime usage of the machine is for photography... and my library is too large to be benefited by fusion drive.

My library continues to grow... but still fits comfortably within the 768 GB capacity along with OSX and my applications. This should last me until I replace this machine in 2015 or 2016. At that point... it will replace my wife's iMac... and 768GB will last her forever.

I will place other non-photography data on my 8TB Pegasus R4.

/Jim
flynz4 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 04:11 PM   #7
NJRonbo
Thread Starter
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Yes, it has been announced that full 768GB SSD is a $1300 upgrade.

(not towards you...)

Please only serious replies only. Trying to gauge how many people here are going to make the investment.
NJRonbo is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 04:23 PM   #8
Shivetya
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
I really don't want to go back to a 3000+ dollar desktop, I remember the days of 386/486 systems costing that much !!!

so 1999 + 150 + 200 + 1300???? as much as I like the idea of an SSD it just isn't ready for prime time at that price. I can almost buy a second iMac for that price.

If they had smaller SSD options I would could see 512g or even living with 256g and external spin drives
__________________
...
Shivetya is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 04:25 PM   #9
NJRonbo
Thread Starter
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Thread title:

Who is opting for the $1300 Full SSD drive on the 2013 iMac?

We already know there are many of you who find this way too expensive (and rightfully so).
NJRonbo is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 04:26 PM   #10
Icaras
macrumors 601
 
Icaras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California, United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by xgman View Post
Wish there was a 512 option.
Yea, me too. I must say the BTO options are pretty oddly gimped this time around,
__________________
iMac (27-inch, Late 2012) iPad Air 2 iPhone 6 Apple TV (3rd Generation) Airport Time Capsule
Icaras is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 04:47 PM   #11
Yeroon
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
I really would like to buy an SSD, but I'm not paying this excessive price (which will probably be $ = €, so € 1300 which is $1680!). If Apple does this, they force their customers to buy their Fusion hdd's by giving no reasonable options for SSD's. Almost a form of blackmail, as they do offer various offers for the Mac mini.

Why not for the iMac? I can't think of a good reason for doing this. If this is true, they don't seem to care about choice and value for their customers.

I'll postpone my purchase and will await other options (such as opening the case and installing an SSD myself of a Thunderbolt SSD). Or just wait for the next iMac... :s

So no, I wont buy it.
Yeroon is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 05:09 PM   #12
Scrapula
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Not me. That is way too much money to spend. Like others, I wish there was a 256GB option. I would get that plus an external HDD. I'll probably opt for the Fusion drive at $250 extra.
Scrapula is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 05:30 PM   #13
iLondoner
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London (the big one, not London Ohio, Texas, Kentucky, etc)
Quote:
Originally Posted by flynz4 View Post
I will be getting the full SSD model. My prime usage of the machine is for photography... and my library is too large to be benefited by fusion drive.
Then you haven't studied the reports of how the Fusion Drive works. It's not on a directory/folder basis, or even on a file basis, but on a block.

I suspect in your case the 1TB Fusion Drive would work very well. A little research might well save you over $1000.
iLondoner is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 05:35 PM   #14
Siderz
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London, UK
Here's a link to a website who supposedly know the BTO prices if anyone's interested - http://www.expercom.com/browse_by_ca...ATEGORY_ID=300

Scroll down to see them.
__________________
focus
Siderz is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 05:41 PM   #15
jetjaguar
macrumors 68000
 
jetjaguar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: new jersey
hmmm i really wanted a full ssd .. but it is just too much .. gonna go for the 3tb fusion i think
__________________
27" iMac | iPhone 6+ | iPad Air | aTV
jetjaguar is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 05:43 PM   #16
Dornblaser
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago-area
I will.
Dornblaser is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 06:41 PM   #17
rainbowsofwhite
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
iMac 27" - i7 / 8GB / 768SSD / GTX675MX

Hi everyone,

I'm going with the full 768 SSD as well.

Fortunately for me, I'm studying full-time (again), so will be taking advantage of education discounts.

An interesting article on Fusion;
http://www.zdnet.com/mac-fusion-driv...re-7000006661/
rainbowsofwhite is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 06:50 PM   #18
Dornblaser
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago-area
Good article. I view the SSD as a tool, folks who understand and can use the SSD will purchase it, casual folks won't. The maxed out iMac, with SSD, should be an awesome workstation which should meet the needs of the creative world with the exception of all but the most demanding video.
Dornblaser is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 07:06 PM   #19
flynz4
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Quote:
Originally Posted by iLondoner View Post
Then you haven't studied the reports of how the Fusion Drive works. It's not on a directory/folder basis, or even on a file basis, but on a block.

I suspect in your case the 1TB Fusion Drive would work very well. A little research might well save you over $1000.
I understand the way that the fusion drive works. My A3 library is about 3X the size 128GB SSD portion of the Fusion drive. When I am working... I want my entire library resident on the SSD. I often scroll through huge portions of my photos. At most maybe about 1/4 of my A3 library could possibly be resident on the SSD portion of fusion. The rest would "by definition"... be on a single spindle HDD.

By buying the full SSD... My entire library could be resident on SSD. The only other viable option that I have is to have the library on my 4 spindle Pegasus R4. I am willing to pay to have it on the SSD.

I would always choose a fusion drive over a single spindle HDD. However, it does not remove the need/desire for having my A3 library permanently resident on SSD.

/Jim
flynz4 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 07:08 PM   #20
BRyken
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJRonbo View Post
Yes, it has been announced that full 768GB SSD is a $1300 upgrade.

(not towards you...)

Please only serious replies only. Trying to gauge how many people here are going to make the investment.
Debatable as an investment considering in 3/4 years 768GB SSD will definitely be less than $1300
__________________
Mac Mini 2.7GHz i7 16GB RAM Fusion Drive | 27" Thunderbolt Display | Seagate Backup Plus 3TB USB 3.0|16 GB Black iPhone 5
BRyken is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 07:11 PM   #21
Siderz
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by rainbowsofwhite View Post
The only source he has is Apple's summary...which is obviously in layman's terms. It could be much more intricate than how Apple put it.

I won't believe it until I see it.

And I can't see this affecting me. Those dozens of GBs of data are on an external drive, where they should be for any professional (Or at least, on a drive separate from the program files and OS).

I'm only going to have a few program's as well. Deleting all the crap (Like iLife, FaceTime, PhotoBooth etc.) that I don't need. I think I may end up getting away with all my program's on the SSD side of the Fusion Drive.
__________________
focus
Siderz is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 07:27 PM   #22
Dornblaser
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago-area
I agree that the full SSD is not "an investment". Indeed, it will depreciate quickly and some day all too soon be totally worthless. However, it is a tool, and I agree with Jim that I want my work, as much as possible, to be on a SSD.
Dornblaser is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 07:32 PM   #23
maverick72
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Will also be getting the full shabang (cpu, ram, graphic, full ssd) options. Just cause i can.

256g is just to little (i have 1 mbp and one imac already on 256g) and its not enough. And once you go SSD you ain't comming back. For no reason. Not even a "partial SSD" system like fusion.
maverick72 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 07:42 PM   #24
xgman
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
I think we should see if they figure out how to open up the case and change drives. That would change things dramatically.
__________________
{2014 27" r-imac-4.0i7-295x-32gb ram-1TBSSD+External TB enclosure>Samsung840evo ssd + Segate Enterprise 5TB-UAD Apollo/Marantz/Amphion/Bowers&Wilkins Sound-Nektar P1 61}
{ipads}{iphones}{LG G3}
xgman is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 09:04 PM   #25
wmy5
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: upstate NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by xgman View Post
I think we should see if they figure out how to open up the case and change drives. That would change things dramatically.
Agree with you. Hopefully iMac's SSD has the same form factor as the one in rMBP or MBA, which you can get a brand new 256GB for $250 at eBay.
wmy5 is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fusion Drive iMac Late 2013 SSD temperature EricDraven iMac 14 Feb 4, 2014 05:47 PM
Fusion Drive/Timecapsule or 512GB SSD? late 2013 iMac. gizmo84 iMac 12 Dec 31, 2013 11:16 AM
What SSD can work with iMac late 2013 to create Fusion Drive EricDraven iMac 8 Dec 19, 2013 02:41 AM
Why are people opting for FUSION drives over full SSD on upcoming iMacs? NJRonbo iMac 113 Nov 27, 2012 03:32 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC