Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 7, 2013, 08:02 PM   #1
gryffinwings
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Aperture 3 vs LR4 Performance on 2008 MacBook

So I've been using Aperture again since I got a newer mac, the latest that will run on Snow Leopard. So I get the itch to try LR4 on the MacBook that I have. What I found was that LR4 actually ran faster on my macbook then Aperture 3 did.

LR4 also ran faster on my Macbook with Intel C2D with 2.5 GBs of RAM than a Sony Viao with Intel Core 2 Duo and 4 GBs of RAM.

So it looks like I will be still work LR4.

Macbook specs are in my signature.
__________________
MacBook, Early 2008, 13", Intel Core 2 Duo 2.1 GHz, 2.5 GB DDR2-667-PC2-5300, 120 GB HD.
Mac G5, Dual Processor 2.0 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD, 1 TB HD, ATI Radeon 9600 XT
gryffinwings is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2013, 09:40 PM   #2
OreoCookie
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fukuoka, Japan
Didn't you ask essentially the same question in an earlier thread? I don't know what more is there to add: your major constraints are the amount of RAM and hard drive speed. Anything that doesn't fit into your RAM will be relegated to the hard drive which is orders of magnitude slower.

Lightroom 4 is not going to be a miracle worker, as soon as you try either piece of software on a recent Mac with copious amounts of RAM, you will not want to go back to your old machine in all likelihood.
__________________
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
OreoCookie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2013, 10:35 PM   #3
gryffinwings
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by OreoCookie View Post
Didn't you ask essentially the same question in an earlier thread? I don't know what more is there to add: your major constraints are the amount of RAM and hard drive speed. Anything that doesn't fit into your RAM will be relegated to the hard drive which is orders of magnitude slower.

Lightroom 4 is not going to be a miracle worker, as soon as you try either piece of software on a recent Mac with copious amounts of RAM, you will not want to go back to your old machine in all likelihood.
I'm just surprised that it actually works faster than Aperture 3, I wasn't actually expecting that considering the Sony Viao was running slow already, I figured the MacBook would too. Kinda weird to me, but it works.
__________________
MacBook, Early 2008, 13", Intel Core 2 Duo 2.1 GHz, 2.5 GB DDR2-667-PC2-5300, 120 GB HD.
Mac G5, Dual Processor 2.0 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD, 1 TB HD, ATI Radeon 9600 XT
gryffinwings is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2013, 12:57 AM   #4
OreoCookie
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fukuoka, Japan
Quote:
Originally Posted by gryffinwings View Post
I'm just surprised that it actually works faster than Aperture 3, I wasn't actually expecting that considering the Sony Viao was running slow already, I figured the MacBook would too. Kinda weird to me, but it works.
The Vaio will be faster as soon as Lightroom requires more than 2.5 GB RAM. From my own experience, I can tell you for a fact that 2.5 GB is way too little, and you'll do yourself a big favor to upgrade. So instead of rationalizing and discussing, I'd just invest in more RAM, it's very cheap. Your machine can take up to 6 GB RAM, so I'd replace the 512 MB module with a 4 GB module if I were you. And if you want to extend the life of your machine even further, replace the harddrive with an SSD (Samsung 840 Pro or Intel 525/335-series).
__________________
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
OreoCookie is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mavericks Performance on Late 2008 Macbook Steve2357 Mac Applications and Mac App Store 1 Oct 25, 2013 02:23 PM
Aperture 3, SL or Lion on Early 2008 MacBook gryffinwings Digital Photography 7 Apr 3, 2013 04:29 AM
Aperture 3 on Early 2008 MacBook 4,1 gryffinwings Mac Applications and Mac App Store 5 Mar 25, 2013 06:06 PM
CS6/LR4 on new Macbook Airs tradman Digital Photography 5 Jul 24, 2012 08:02 PM
ML performance on late-2008 13" Macbook? jafingi OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion 9 Jul 20, 2012 12:39 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC