|
|
#26 | ||
|
Quote:
Again, AT&T with their policies, but until this summer, it was their policy to not block stolen phones. Now will they not only block a stolen phone, but they and T-Mobile now share their databases of stolen devices, so stolen phones will be blocked on both networks. Quote:
Your other points are valid. AT&T throttles you 24/7 for the remainder of the month, once you hit their threshold. Verizon throttles the top 5% data users only when they connected to an overloaded tower. But the verb for a carrier "purposefully reducing your data speed" is: throttle. And both AT&T and Verizon do it. They just have totally different policies about it. |
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#27 |
|
That doesn't really mean much. Are you competitively pricing the phone? What condition is it in? Does it have a clean ESN? All those things can factor into how much people will want it.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Better is always highly subjective, regardless of topic. For many, at&t does not meet their coverage (which varies by location) needs where Verizon does. Don't just assume that your situation and preferences are universal no matter what the topic.
Quote:
"We manage data connection speeds for a small subset of customers – the top 5% of data users with 3G devices on unlimited data plans " is certianly throttling. They may throttle a smaller subset of customers but it's still throttling. Nowhere in the definition of the word "throttle" is 3GB mentioned. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#29 | ||
|
Quote:
But where I live (which is right smack in the middle of the city), Verizon's LTE network is crap. I get one bar of LTE in my house. Thankfully I can use WiFi for data (and Verizon's CDMA voice network comes through with four bars), but anyone that works near my neighborhood will have the same in-building coverage issue with Verizon that I have with AT&T. Crazy. Quote:
|
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Quote:
I'm annoyed that Verizon doesn't have the little globe symbol next to the iPhone 5 on its website denoting a world phone. The Verizon iPhone 5 is every bit as much a world phone as the AT&T iPhone 5. Some might even say it's more of a world phone because it's GSM unlocked out of the box on contract. |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#31 |
|
In Australia they just charge you a couple of dollars per mb over your quota, so you can easily rack up a bill in the thousands or tens of thousands of dollars.
Worse yet is the quota 'alerts' which are delayed by 6-48 hours, often arriving when you've already gone well over your quota After 5 years of this **** our lazy politicians have finally agreed to put stricter carrier rules in place, which haven't yet taken effect and probably won't for another couple of years. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#32 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Everyone seems to bash AT&T because of coverage. Well I only can speak for myself, but here AT&T blows Verizon away in coverage. I had Verizon and dropped so many calls it wasn't funny. If Verizon and AT&T have the equal coverage in an area, AT&T should be a no brainer. Not to mention AT&T has HSPA+a when not in LTE. Verizon can't say they have the same. |
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Neither carrier is better. All have their own strengths and weaknesses. Att is no better than Verizon. The same can be said vice versa. You go to a crappy dead zone with AT&T. That HSPA+ means absolutely nothing. Just saying.
To the ones replied to my post about Verizon throttling. Sure they throttle if you wanna subsitute throttling for optimizination which Verizon uses. Like I said. "On a congested tower they will slow your speeds down but they will resume your data speeds if your on a non congested tower". I don't know how many times do I have to say this. AT&T on the other hand clearly sends messages out to users who hit 3GBs and the throttling begins for the rest of that monthly cycle. That doesn't happen with Verizon at all. You're welcome. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#34 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Quote:
That's the benefit Verizon has OVER AT&T. That was my point. ![]() Edit: Sorry if I'm repeating it over and over again. But I wanted it to be clear. Last edited by xlost6; Dec 2, 2012 at 05:33 PM. |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
3
|
|
|
#37 |
|
when i got my first LTE phone from VZW a year ago i was pulling avg 25 MPS around me and by my parents i was pulling close to 50 MPS..... now a year later im lucky to hit 15 MPS by me and 25 by my parents....more people have LTE phones now so more towers are congested with users using LTE...when Sandy hit my area i never lost service with VZW even data although i think it was on 2g or something...the power by me was out for days and i could still use phone....when i went to work and power was out everyone with AT&T didnt have service and only i had it and my manager needed to use my phone to call other stores...so as far as i am concerned i will never leave VZW..yes they are more then others but what they offer is the worth it to me.
i went to a share everything plan because it was cheaper for me when i had my ex on my plan(now off it) and she bought my an iPad lte over the summer and when i put this on my plan i was paying less then what i was when it was jsut me and her (and even less now that shes off) but i also get 20% off because of my job so that helps alot too...
__________________
MBP 13", 256GB SSD, 8GB RAM, 500GB HDD in Optical bay|iPad 3 32GB | 2TB Time Capsule| iPhone 5 64GB Slate VZW| AppleTV Last edited by Afbar1114; Dec 2, 2012 at 06:10 PM. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#38 |
|
All wireless carriers suck, that's the issue with big companies you'll have a bad experience from time to time.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Quote:
There's a reason AT&T finished dead last in Consumer Reports ranking of wireless carriers (60,000+ people were polled.) That reason? They suck. Oh, and instead of comparing last generation technology, why not look at the current generation. Tests show Verizon LTE and AT&T LTE virtually tied in speed. |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
sigh...
Quote:
It's called try and experience things on your own to figure out what works best for YOU. It is sad that people rely on the reviews and opinions of others for what they will purchase, use etc.
__________________
iPad mini 4G LTE 16 GB Black Verizon iPhone 5 Black 32gb AT&T 15" Macbook Pro (2010) 2.4GHz Intel Core i5 8gb Ram Airport Express (2012 model), Apple TV (3rd Gen), 2nd gen Apple TV (MIA...) |
||
|
|
3
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Quote:
I've had all 4 major carriers. And I stand by my previous comments, based on my experiences. |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Quote:
I wonder if that is true for AT&T as well, and we are just talking about 3G. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#43 |
|
|
1
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Thanks for your oh-so-helpful comment, Captain Obvious!
And PS... That's not what he said. Please get a brain before quoting posts and giving stupid replies. Last edited by josh995; Dec 3, 2012 at 10:12 AM. |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#45 | ||
|
Quote:
I had att.. would drop calls when driving all the time. Verizon never. ---------- Quote:
All this speed nonsense is subjective to location. Some places on ATT i only get 1-1.5 mbps.. same as my verizon 3g. some places i get 30 mbps on my lte ipad on att. while i get 50 mbps on my ip5 verizon I can have unthrottled unlimited/unlimited hotspot on VZW facetime over cell.. but cant subsidize. Att i can subsidize.. how about his... i can drive from San Antonio 5 hours to dallas and have LTE at 30-50 mbps more than %75 of the way... can ATT say the same? I just switched from att and i would get constant dropped calls while driving. From my usual commute from Austin to dallas. (4 hours) I dont get any on verizon. they all have their pros and cons.. i cant use voice and data on verizon etc. THERE IS NO WINNER.. its all based on what phone fits YOUR needs for your LOCATION, BUDGET ETC |
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#46 |
|
60,000 people out of 320+ Million total wireless subscribers...
__________________
iPad mini 4G LTE 16 GB Black Verizon iPhone 5 Black 32gb AT&T 15" Macbook Pro (2010) 2.4GHz Intel Core i5 8gb Ram Airport Express (2012 model), Apple TV (3rd Gen), 2nd gen Apple TV (MIA...) |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Sounds like a pretty good sample.
__________________
I wish my lawn was emo so it would cut itself. ![]() Air, Imac, Black/Slate iPhone 5 (GSM) |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#48 |
|
I have never received that message when I was on Verizon and now that I'm back with AT&T. I also try to be conscious of my data useage. I know I have an alloted amount of 3GB of data, so I the most I do when I'm not at home is stream music, check Facebook and Twitter, and send iMessages to friends. I refuse to watch any videos on Youtube on LTE unless I'm at home connected to wifi.
__________________
13" MBP 2.3GHz l iPhone 5 l 4G iPod Touch l Apple TV l 5D Mark III l L glass |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#49 | ||
|
Quote:
Comparing last gen technology? Really? Well I guess LTE is on its way there too, since T-Mobile will be deploying LTE advanced in a few months. Use HSPA+ and I bet you'll re-evaluate your thoughts. ![]() Quote:
But that is subjective. As I previously said, AT&T wins for me simply because of their technology. Simultaneous voice and data and their EDGE network compares to Verizon and Sprint's EV-DO network. People on Verizon need to use HSPA+ then maybe they'll understand. Its not "4G" though, I'll admit that, but its sure fast. Who cares if its 3g technology. It can compete with LTE. Like I said, I can pull 10 down on H+. Some Verizon markets are getting so flooded with LTE users they can't even pull 5 down. |
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Soon AT&T will be pulling the same number you said Verizon was pulling for you when AT&T gets flooded with LTE customers. Their time will come. Trust me.
|
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.










Linear Mode
