Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 10, 2012, 04:20 PM   #51
macrumors 68020
brdeveloper's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brasil
Originally Posted by RobertMartens View Post
Kodak was a film company. An expert in film. They couldn't save themselves because film died.

They could have started selling Kodak toothpaste or digital cameras but that would not have 'saved' the company. It would have just been a different company with a very similar sounding name.
Well, film is died because Kodak acted like Nokia on R&D in the last years. Sigma does a nice work using the film concept (3-layers RGB sensor). Color rendering on Foveon sensors are the best in the market.

Also, even the chemical film could be innovated, making processing and scanning easier to the end user. However, in the last years Kodak concentrated their efforts on making cheap digital cameras and pushing the printing business. It isn't the film that was becoming obsolete, but the idea of printing pictures in paper. An easy develop-and-scan (share) device would probably make film live longer.

By the way, I still take pictures with my 135 reflex cameras sometimes. I have a Nikon Coolscan V (launched in 2005) scanner which outputs 20MP digital pictures in 14-bit per channel. The results are pretty impressive even in 2012. If I had a 120-format camera and a Nikon 9000 scanner, the results would pair most recent medium format digital cameras.

In short, it's not the film that died, but the way Kodak (and Fujifilm, although Fuji is acting pretty well in the digital camera market) carried its business.
2015 13" MBA, 128GB, 4GB
Early-2013 15" rMBP, 2.4GHz.
2009 Unibody White MacBook, 250GB 840 EVO SSD, 8GB
Mid-2010 MacMini, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD, 16GB
brdeveloper is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 26, 2012, 09:48 PM   #52
macrumors 65816
luminosity's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arizona
Originally Posted by 1957GoldTop View Post
You're joking right? Kodak's professional film was and still is the standard. I'm a professional photographer (a real one, not an ex-dentist that now takes pictures of pregnant moms and pets) and when I shoot film only use Kodak. Tri-x is THE legendary b&w film. Kodachrome is a beyond iconic color film and Portra is a spectacular color negative film.

So, while Kodak screwed a lot of things up, professional film was never one of them.
I wouldn't be sorry to see Tri-X bite the dust. It's an overrated film, and is inferior to HP5. I've never understood the raves it gets.

Portra is a terrific film, though, and if I could pick only one emulsion to save, it would be Portra 400. Somehow, that film has to be saved. I do most of my best work when using film, and these days that means color film. I use Portra 400 for almost everything (which for me means photographing people).
17'' MBP 2.8 4 GB RAM 500 HD, 15'' MBP 2.33, 2 GB RAM 120 HD
luminosity is offline   0 Reply With Quote

MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Pays at Least $10 Million to License Palm-Related Patents From ACCESS MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 15 Apr 13, 2013 10:30 PM
Kodak to Sell Patent Portfolio to 12-Member Consortium Including Apple for $525 Million MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 13 Dec 19, 2012 03:53 PM
Google goes after Apple via Motorola patents Dolorian Alternatives to iOS and iOS Devices 32 Sep 20, 2012 07:14 AM
Apple, Google, and Samsung Teaming Up in Effort to Acquire Kodak Patents MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 59 Aug 19, 2012 07:46 PM
Apple and Google Lead Separate Groups in Bidding for Kodak Patents MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 117 Aug 1, 2012 09:08 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2015, MacRumors.com, LLC