Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:13 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Shipping Estimates for 27-Inch Retina iMac Slip to 2 to 3 Weeks




Supplies of the 27-inch iMac with Retina 5K display have been slowly dwindling ahead of the holidays, and as of this week, shipping estimates for both standard and custom configurations have slipped to two to three weeks.

At launch on October 16, shipping estimates were briefly at a day before slipping to 3 to 5 days, later moving to 7 to 10 days before slipping again on Monday.

The base Retina iMac, with a 3.5GHz processor, 8GB of RAM, and a 1TB fusion drive, is in stock at many retail Apple Stores around the country and can be picked up same day, but when ordered from the online store, it carries the same two to three week shipping estimate as all custom configurations.

While Retina iMacs ordered from the online Apple Store may not arrive until December, some Apple resellers have available stock that will ship much earlier. Amazon, for example, has the base model in stock available with Amazon Prime shipping and a $50 discount.

MacMall has the base model in stock for immediate shipping, plus the site has several machines with various custom configurations on hand, which it says will ship in five to seven days. MacMall is also offering a discount of $50 on much of its stock.

Other stores like Best Buy and B&H Photo also have the base Retina iMac in stock and available to ship immediately.

Equipped with a 5120 x 2880 "5K" Retina screen, Apple's newest iMac has received largely positive reviews for its impressive display, and configured with a 4.0GHz processor and 32GB of RAM, the higher-end Retina iMac models are able to outperform the low-end Mac Pro.

Article Link: Shipping Estimates for 27-Inch Retina iMac Slip to 2 to 3 Weeks
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:23 PM   #2
giantfan1224
macrumors 6502a
 
giantfan1224's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
I wonder why having it shipped is that far out. Every zip code I put in has it available at all the nearest Apple Stores.
giantfan1224 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:25 PM   #3
kunia
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Mobile graphics card in a nearly $3k desktop computer...iMacs always make me LOL. New trend at Apple: looks over function, a contradiction to industrial design.
kunia is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:28 PM   #4
Wiggle
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunia View Post
Mobile graphics card in a nearly $3k desktop computer...iMacs always make me LOL. New trend at Apple: looks over function, a contradiction to industrial design.
Mine is playing all my games and running FCP and Premiere juuuuuust fine. Not sure what you're whining about.
Wiggle is offline   23 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:30 PM   #5
Starship77
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggle View Post
Mine is playing all my games and running FCP and Premiere juuuuuust fine. Not sure what you're whining about.
nevermind the troll...
Starship77 is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:34 PM   #6
mr.steevo
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunia View Post
New trend at Apple: looks over function, a contradiction to industrial design.
Are you new around here?
mr.steevo is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:40 PM   #7
brianvictor7
macrumors 6502a
 
brianvictor7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Midwest, US
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunia View Post
Mobile graphics card in a nearly $3k desktop computer...iMacs always make me LOL. New trend at Apple: looks over function, a contradiction to industrial design.
PHENOMENAL COSMIC GAMING POWER! iddy biddy graphics card space.

Hey, if it works, why complain?
__________________
Macbook Pro Retina 13" (2013) iPhone 5S iMac 21.5" (2009)
brianvictor7 is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:40 PM   #8
B2k1977
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunia View Post
Mobile graphics card in a nearly $3k desktop computer...iMacs always make me LOL. New trend at Apple: looks over function, a contradiction to industrial design.
meh...don't you have a windows 8 machine to go fix?

Last edited by stridemat; Nov 15, 2014 at 02:51 AM. Reason: Removed trolling
B2k1977 is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:48 PM   #9
Digital Skunk
macrumors 604
 
Digital Skunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In my imagination
HOOOOOOOOOOOOOT Product!

It's Definitely a game changer if you ask me. Save for the power differences it's hard to pick between the iMac and the base Mac Pro.
__________________
What do I have?, stuff that I actually use for work! Some old, some new, all effective.
Digital Skunk is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:50 PM   #10
RickInHouston
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by B2k1977 View Post
meh...don't you have a windows 8 machine to go fix?
What in the world would he have to fix. Everything is soldered.

Oh.

Wait.

Sorry.

Last edited by stridemat; Nov 15, 2014 at 02:51 AM. Reason: Updated quote
RickInHouston is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:50 PM   #11
rGiskard
macrumors 65816
 
rGiskard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Meh, Apple forgot to offer one of these to blow it while you're using it.



Yeah, it's too thin so it overheats. Ive dared to fail again.
__________________
Mac Pro 3.46 GHz Hexa-Core W3690, 24 GB RAM, GeForce GTX 680, 6G PCIe SSD RAID
rGiskard is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:51 PM   #12
MrX8503
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunia View Post
Mobile graphics card in a nearly $3k desktop computer...iMacs always make me LOL. New trend at Apple: looks over function, a contradiction to industrial design.
You can buy the unreleased Dell 5K monitor (no computer) for nearly $3k. Or how about all the fake 4K TN panels?

Looks like the iMac 5k is a steal and is ahead by a generation. Enjoy your fake 4K.
MrX8503 is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 01:57 PM   #13
k1121j
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North East USA
i got mine and love it
k1121j is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:08 PM   #14
kunia
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggle View Post
Mine is playing all my games and running FCP and Premiere juuuuuust fine. Not sure what you're whining about.
Angry birds HD edition and home-made videos of pet cat? Why don't you do some research on what actually R9 M295X is. Just the concept of a mobile graphics card pushing that many pixels is pathetic. Those crappy cards were a joke before retina iMacs, now it's a full on circus.
And Apple does it because they can. People will still buy those pretty looking iMacs with out-of-date components.

A Ferrari with a Prius engine - at least it moves. Whatever floats your boat.
kunia is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:10 PM   #15
lincolntran
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggle View Post
Mine is playing all my games and running FCP and Premiere juuuuuust fine. Not sure what you're whining about.
For windows users (whiner ones), it's not bout how things work together in a nice package. It's about how they look on a spec sheet.
lincolntran is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:11 PM   #16
WardC
macrumors 68030
 
WardC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Send a message via AIM to WardC
Still wondering why on this super-exclusive, premium iMac model that starts at $2500, they equipped the standard model with an underpowered i5 and not an i7. It would make more sense to make 3.5GHz i7 standard, and the 4.0GHz model a BTO upgrade.

When they introduced it a few weeks ago, they run through the specs and mention it comes with a "Blazing fast i5 processor" -- I was like...really??? With something like this I would be expecting Xeon-like power, nothing less!!

Yes, backside cache really does matter.
__________________
iMac 27" 3.4GHz i7 SSD 16GB RAM
MacBook Pro 15-inch 2.6GHz i7 256GB SSD/ 16GB RAM

Thinking about Apple...
WardC is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:12 PM   #17
jmgregory1
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago and Spooner (when it's not 20 below)
The base 27" riMac will be our next work computer purchase. To get the 5k screen for what essentially is a $600 premium over the standard 27" iMac, plus getting better graphics and cpu to boot, is a steal. Then spend another $165 for an additional 16gb of ram and you have a powerhouse AIO with better than 4k screen.

I was just at an Apple store the other night and forgot to check them out, although I'm never happy with any screens in-store, due to the overpowered ambient lighting.
jmgregory1 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:15 PM   #18
kunia
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by lincolntran View Post
For windows users (whiner ones), it's not bout how things work together in a nice package. It's about how they look on a spec sheet.
Funny how people assume I'm on a botched up PC since I'm criticizing an apple product.
kunia is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:21 PM   #19
mattopotamus
macrumors 604
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunia View Post
Mobile graphics card in a nearly $3k desktop computer...iMacs always make me LOL. New trend at Apple: looks over function, a contradiction to industrial design.
A fusion drive is just as shocking
mattopotamus is online now   5 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:27 PM   #20
BornAgainMac
macrumors 601
 
BornAgainMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida Resident
I like the iMac but I wish the screen really was flat from the side view without looking pregnant and the base had easy access to the memory and drive with a door, no soldering, and no tools required. It would be something like a small Mac Mini but integrated with the monitor so you don't see any wires. And you can upgrade the Mac by replacing this entire base without having to replace the monitor by just sliding it out of the integrated dock. That would be a really nice Mac that only Apple can do.
BornAgainMac is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:30 PM   #21
macduke
macrumors 68040
 
macduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
I just keep telling myself "Skylake, Skylake, Skylake!" when I feel the temptation to press the buy button. From the reviews I've seen, this thing is a little bit jittery running at this high resolution. I bought a first gen Retina MacBook Pro and it did the same thing. It's just not ideal to buy first gen retina devices, like the iPad 3. The only one that was decent was the iPhone 4. Totally getting it whenever Skylake drops, either next autumn or spring 2016. Hopefully by then 1TB SSDs will be cheaper too.
__________________
15" Retina MacBook Pro / Quad 2.6GHz Core i7 / 16GB / 512GB SSD
128GB iPhone 6 Plus / 128GB iPad Air 2 / Original iPhone & iPad
Canon 7D / 24-105L / 100-400L / Sony RX100 / Xbox One
macduke is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:31 PM   #22
jmgregory1
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago and Spooner (when it's not 20 below)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunia View Post
Funny how people assume I'm on a botched up PC since I'm criticizing an apple product.
So what do you think should be in the Retina iMac for a graphics card? At some point, you do have to make decisions with price vs performance considered. Sure, Apple could put in one of the better graphics cards, but then people would complain that the price is too high at $2999, which I would agree. And specs are not everything. Do you have or have you tried a new 5k iMac to know whether the gpu is underpowered?
jmgregory1 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:33 PM   #23
johncarync
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
I was in the Apple store this week and compared a regular 27" iMac sitting next to a Retina iMac. I could tell a difference...but only when I looked really close. It was not the stunning difference I had thought it would be. You might want to see for yourself before taking out your wallet. Unless you're a photo professional, you might not find it worth the extra money.
johncarync is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:40 PM   #24
iBug2
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunia View Post
Mobile graphics card in a nearly $3k desktop computer...iMacs always make me LOL. New trend at Apple: looks over function, a contradiction to industrial design.
295 is just as fast as a HD7970 which is capable of playing most of the modern games at ultra settings at 1440k resolution. I don't know what you are whining about unless you want this Mac to run games at 5K resolution, which is basically a fools errand right now even on Windows with quad SLI.
__________________
MP Hex D700 32GB-1TB, rMBP 2.7 15" 16GB, ATD, iPhone 4S, iPad Air
iBug2 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2014, 02:44 PM   #25
OriginalMacRat
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by BornAgainMac View Post
I like the iMac but I wish the screen really was flat from the side view without looking pregnant
Apparently you don't remember CRTs.
OriginalMacRat is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC