Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 12, 2012, 03:42 PM   #1
pgiguere1
macrumors 68000
 
pgiguere1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Upcoming 10W CPUs. Would you sacrifice CPU clock speed for better battery life?

Now that Intel will be releasing 10W CPUs, I'm wondering if it would make sense to put those in the MacBook Air.

They would have the same iGPU and same L3 cache as the 17W CPUs currently in use, but slightly lower clock speeds.

They would allow for a better battery life by significantly reducing the power draw from the CPU and heat dissipation, leaving space for a slightly bigger battery by using a smaller cooling system.

Here's the Ivy Bridge 10W lineup to get an idea of the specs:


The Haswell lineup has not been revealed yet.

So basically, what would you rather have:

A 2013 MacBook Air with a 2.0 GHz Haswell Core i5 (17W) and 5-7 hours battery life
or
a 2013 MacBook Air with a 1.7 GHz Haswell Core i5 (10W) and 8-10 hours battery life

supposing they were the same price?

Just curious.
pgiguere1 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 12, 2012, 03:44 PM   #2
blueroom
macrumors 603
 
blueroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Yes, my old 2010 MBP C2D is still running everything I use just fine. Longer battery life is always welcome.
__________________
My iOS devices are not jailbroken.
Bill
My Blog
blueroom is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 12, 2012, 03:54 PM   #3
53x12
macrumors 68000
 
53x12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Definitely take the 2013 MacBook Air with a 1.7 GHz Haswell Core i5 (10W) and 8-10 hours battery life of those two options. Won't miss the slight drop in clock speed but would notice the benefit with longer battery life, running cooler and quieter. I like the sound of that.
53x12 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 12, 2012, 06:11 PM   #4
phoenixsan
macrumors 65816
 
phoenixsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Post Well.....

not being a mobile computer user and thinking the Air is not a "pro" machine, IMHO, I would go with the extended battery time



__________________
Mac Pro 2012 3.06 Westmere version, 12 Core 64 GB RAM, 4 TB , iPhone 5 (black), Moto G 8 GB (black)
phoenixsan is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speculations on upcoming 2013 rMBP 13 battery life nyc999 MacBook Pro 25 Aug 15, 2013 04:17 PM
Battery life impact of 1.7 ghz CPU upgrade? icing MacBook Air 21 Jun 20, 2013 01:00 PM
Intel Hashwell CPUs will have 50 pct. more battery life kristoffer4 MacBook Air 31 Jun 4, 2013 12:35 PM
iPad Mini: would you be willing to sacrifice battery life and performance to get a retina screen brand iPad 77 Nov 9, 2012 03:23 PM
Will The 10W iPad Adapter Charge Hi-Speed With Lightning Cable? boltjames iPhone 18 Sep 21, 2012 09:52 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC