Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:55 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Hit With Class-Action Lawsuit Over Failing 27" iMac Displays




An Idaho man is suing Apple under California's consumer protection laws because the display on his 27-inch iMac failed 18 months after he bought it -- notably outside the twelve-month standard warranty period, reports GigaOm.

The suit, which refers to a 321-page thread on the Apple Support Community as well as a post on TechCrunch from 2009, asks for more than $5 million in class-action damages and seeks to represent every Apple customer that purchased a 27-inch iMac with an LG display before December 2012.

Quote:
In a complaint filed last week in San Jose, aspiring music teacher Corbin Rasmussen says he thought the iMac was expensive but, relying on Apple's claims that is was "designed for a long productive life," saved up to buy one to use as a home computer and media center,

Rasmussen claims that, after 50 percent of the screen went dim, the iMac became nearly useless for watching movies and made basic web browsing difficult. He complained to Apple, which told him a repair would cost more than $500 since the defect arose after the product's one year warranty expired.

Article Link: Apple Hit With Class-Action Lawsuit Over Failing 27" iMac Displays
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:57 PM   #2
bmunge
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Sucks for him, but I don't see how he has a case given that it's outside of the warranty period.
bmunge is offline   16 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:57 PM   #3
Nunyabinez
macrumors 6502a
 
Nunyabinez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Provo, UT
So Apple's reputation for quality is now being used against them. Got it.
__________________
27" iMac, 3.4 GHz i7; 15" MBP, 2.53 GHz Core 2 Duo; 13" MBA 1.7 GHz i5; iPad (3rd Gen), 16 GB; iPhone 5S; Hackintosh, 3.4 GHz i7 (2600k)
Nunyabinez is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:57 PM   #4
segalas
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
He should have purchased Applecare.
segalas is offline   32 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:58 PM   #5
d0nK
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Hence the reason for consumer law in the UK.
One year warranty is not good enough.
Simple.
d0nK is offline   92 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:58 PM   #6
ranasjsu
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
5 Mil?

5 Million $ for what? This is ridiculous.
Why not just take his Screen back and give back his money?
ranasjsu is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:58 PM   #7
illegalprelude
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California
Send a message via AIM to illegalprelude Send a message via MSN to illegalprelude Send a message via Yahoo to illegalprelude
I see how purchasing a $2,000 equals to a $5,000,000 reward. Times like this, I hope Apple lawyers burry the guy
__________________
"PeAcE is but a shadow of death, desperate to forget its painful past"
SonyRumors.net Sony News, Talk, and Reviews
Bebi Tech Consulting Your Mac Consultant
illegalprelude is offline   17 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:58 PM   #8
antseg
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New Jersey
Watch the settlement end up netting each claimant $485 for repairs.
antseg is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:58 PM   #9
Philoman
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Complaints are necessary and good for quality control.
Philoman is offline   49 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:58 PM   #10
Patriks7
macrumors 65816
 
Patriks7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Batcave
I'm not sure I understand US laws, on what grounds is he suing?
__________________
iPhone 5 | iPad rMini | iPod Nano
MacBook Pro Unibody 15" | Canon 40D
Soon: rMBP
Patriks7 is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:58 PM   #11
kpac
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Considering there is a 320 + pages thread about (what I presume to be) a similar problem with this particular LG panel, my guest is that he has a case...
kpac is offline   17 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:59 PM   #12
PlutoPrime
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
I had the same problem as this dude, with the same generation iMac, but Apple replaced my screen free of charge because (per the Apple employee explanation) the failure was a type of failure that was not supposed to happen in the product's lifetime (regardless of warranty status).
PlutoPrime is offline   13 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:59 PM   #13
roadbloc
macrumors 604
 
roadbloc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
What is the relevance of the lemon?
__________________
roadbloc is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:59 PM   #14
ranasjsu
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriks7 View Post
I'm not sure I understand US laws, on what grounds is he suing?
just trying to make money and never work again. Pathetic
ranasjsu is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:59 PM   #15
TBone1098
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
He just wants the money to buy a new iMac.
TBone1098 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 03:59 PM   #16
madcran
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Thats why AppleCare exists. While Apple does have the smallest number of issues with their products versus other PC manufacturers, it does not mean they are all going to last forever. It is still built with consumer electronics that are manufactured by other companies. You take a chance when you do not buy AppleCare.
madcran is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 04:00 PM   #17
sp3k0psv3t
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Miami, FL
Is this guy joking? That stinks his monitor is not working well but it is well past the warranty period.

The A/C on my 4 year old car isn't blowing as cold now as it used to when new - guess I should sue BMW for 10 million lol.

America and these law suit laws seriously need an overhaul so frivolousness can be cut off at the source before tying up court time.
sp3k0psv3t is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 04:00 PM   #18
La Porta
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Send a message via AIM to La Porta
It was outside the warranty period. It is at their discretion to fix it or not, they have no obligation to do so once the warranty is up.
__________________
Proud owner of over 33 legacy Apple/Mac computers.
La Porta is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 04:00 PM   #19
oopl
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
I'm glad I didn't have to deal with this issue.
I do agree that 1 year warranty is not enough.
Step up the consumer protection laws U.S.
oopl is offline   26 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 04:01 PM   #20
BMcCoy
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by d0nK View Post
Hence the reason for consumer law in the UK.
One year warranty is not good enough.
Simple.
Yup.

We have the Sale Of Goods Act in the UK, which ensures consumer products must be fit for purpose, and last a reasonable length of time, which is usually around 5 years for small and medium electricals, including computers.

Very surprised that the US does not have similar legislation.
BMcCoy is offline   30 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 04:01 PM   #21
JeffiJers
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: U.S.
Not that I agree with the guy at all... I do believe there should be laws implemented similar to Europe's with consumer electronics.

Sure parts deteriorate etc. But known issues such are failure's and for example Image retention should not be put on the customer to pay the bill.

my 2cents.

edit: look a post above mine haha
JeffiJers is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 04:01 PM   #22
La Porta
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Send a message via AIM to La Porta
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadbloc View Post
What is the relevance of the lemon?
A lemon is a product that is so broken when it is new that it is practically unusable. There are so-called "lemon laws" to protect consumers from new cars that are practically falling apart.
__________________
Proud owner of over 33 legacy Apple/Mac computers.
La Porta is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 04:02 PM   #23
davidec
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
This guy is a fame seeker but he is within his statutory rights to expect this kind of product to last for years.
davidec is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 04:03 PM   #24
Crunch
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hollywood Hills, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by antseg View Post
Watch the settlement end up netting each claimant $485 for repairs.
Yea, but the lawyers will end up with tens of millions. Each.
__________________
Flash-only 27" iMac w/ quad-core Intel Core i5-4670 3.4GHz / 3.8GHz max. Turbo | NVIDIA GTX 775M w/ 2GB GDDR5 | 24GB DDR3-1600MHz RAM | 256GB Samsung PCIe x2 SSD
Crunch is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 04:03 PM   #25
Andrew Kelly
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Australia Law

I had the exact same problem recently. However we have greater consumer law protection in Australia which meant that Apple had to fix the screen for free even though the warranty had expired 6 months before the problem arose.
Andrew Kelly is offline   15 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC